Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "registerpassbase".
2007 Mar 23
1
[LLVMdev] NEWBIE: deleting Instructions
...fo-output-file' defined more than once!
opt: CommandLine Error: Argument 'help' defined more than once!
opt: CommandLine Error: Argument 'help-hidden' defined more than once!
opt: CommandLine Error: Argument 'version' defined more than once!
opt: Pass.cpp:346: void llvm::RegisterPassBase::registerPass(): Assertion
`PassInfoMap->find(PIObj.getTypeInfo()) == PassInfoMap->end() && "Pass
already registered!"' failed.
Aborted
PASS:
virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F)
{
bool change= false;
Function* func = &F;
for(Function::iterator it...
2008 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] Possibly Vista-related Windows/MinGW Compilation Issues
...raphLinkVar'
c:/Build/llvm-build/tools/opt/Release/AnalysisWrappers.o:AnalysisWrappers.cpp:(.text+0x15c): undefined reference to `llvm::IncludeFile::IncludeFile(void*)'
c:/Build/llvm-build/tools/opt/Release/AnalysisWrappers.o:AnalysisWrappers.cpp:(.text+0x1e9): undefined reference to `llvm::RegisterPassBase::registerPass()'
I thought I'd messed up something related to the linker, but I couldn't explain why XP would work using the same steps.
Jonathan
_________________________________________________________________
Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
http://www....
2003 Dec 15
1
[LLVMdev] Assertion failed in Pass.cpp
...,
I am trying to write a pass for the llc tool. I register this pass
with the RegisterLLC template. However, when I try to run llc and load
up the pass, I get a failed assertion:
$ /storage/anshuman/llvmCVS/llvm/tools/Debug/llc -load=./libTest.so
--help
...
...
llc: Pass.cpp:327: void
llvm::RegisterPassBase::unregisterPass(llvm::PassInfo*): Assertion `I
!= PassInfoMap->end() && "Pass registered but not in map!"' failed.
Any ideas why I'm getting this? I've attached the pass code below.
(I'm using the cvs version of the LLVM code.)
Thanks
-Anshu
--- Begin pas...
2003 Nov 13
4
[LLVMdev] llvm 1.0, g++, SuSE 9, internal compiler error
> > - gcc bug
> > - problem with SuSE distribution
>
> One of these two. In theory GCC should never crash (even if the LLVM
> sources had problems), and since SuSE made modifications to the compiler
> before they shipped it, they implicitly took responsibility for the end
> result.
I agree.
> You can try sending a bug report to SuSE.
hm, sending bug report is