search for: registered_handl

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "registered_handl".

Did you mean: registered_handler
2014 Feb 20
4
[PATCH 1/2] mllib: add an hook to cleanup directories on exit
...ctories. --- mllib/common_utils.ml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) diff --git a/mllib/common_utils.ml b/mllib/common_utils.ml index 3943417..f49ede6 100644 --- a/mllib/common_utils.ml +++ b/mllib/common_utils.ml @@ -386,6 +386,35 @@ let unlink_on_exit = registered_handlers := true ) +(* Remove a temporary directory on exit. *) +let rmdir_on_exit = + let dirs = ref [] in + let registered_handlers = ref false in + + let rec unlink_dirs () = + let rec recursive_rmdir fn = + if Sys.is_directory fn then ( + let names = Array.map (fun d -> fn...
2008 Mar 16
8
include a page in another
Hi, for my isbn plugin, I''m wishing to incldue generated isbn pages in caller pages (the ones with <isbn value=""> tags). But I want my isbn page to be processed before for its tags to be transformed (like the relocatable or other ones). Besides, i do not want its header to be included. Is there an easy solution for that, or should I do the work myself ? -- Nicolas
2017 Jun 15
0
[PATCH v6 04/41] mllib: Split ‘Common_utils’ into ‘Std_utils’ + ‘Common_utils’.
...= function + | [] -> "" + | x :: xs -> " " ^ Filename.quote x ^ quote_args xs + in + match args with + | [] -> "" + | app :: xs -> app ^ quote_args xs + +(* Unlink a temporary file on exit. *) +let unlink_on_exit = + let files = ref [] in + let registered_handlers = ref false in + + let rec unlink_files () = + List.iter ( + fun file -> try Unix.unlink file with _ -> () + ) !files + and register_handlers () = + (* Unlink on exit. *) + at_exit unlink_files + in + + fun file -> + files := file :: !files; + if not !register...
2017 Jun 19
16
[PATCH v7 00/13] Refactor utilities
This is just the utilities part of the patch series from: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html I believe this addresses everything raised in comments on that patch series. Rich.
2017 Jun 09
12
[PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions.
This turned out to be rather more involved than I thought. We have lots of utility functions, spread all over the repository, with not a lot of structure. This moves many of them under common/ and structures them so there are clear dependencies. This doesn't complete the job by any means. Other items I had on my to-do list for this change were: - Split up mllib/common_utils into: -
2016 Dec 08
4
[PATCH] generator: Share Common_utils code.
...e) cmd = if echo_cmd then @@ -748,6 +838,8 @@ let uuidgen () = if len < 10 then assert false; (* sanity check on uuidgen *) uuid +(*<stdlib>*) + (* Unlink a temporary file on exit. *) let unlink_on_exit = let files = ref [] in @@ -769,6 +861,8 @@ let unlink_on_exit = registered_handlers := true ) +(*</stdlib>*) + (* Remove a temporary directory on exit. *) let rmdir_on_exit = let dirs = ref [] in @@ -905,6 +999,8 @@ let detect_file_type filename = close_in chan; ret +(*<stdlib>*) + let is_block_device file = try (Unix.stat file).Unix.st_kind...
2017 Jun 12
32
[PATCH v5 00/32] Refactor utilities, implement some APIs in OCaml.
This is a combination of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html [PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions. plus: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html [PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml. with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and some other adjustments and extensions. This passes
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid