search for: reghack

I have a handful of machines with all of the latest windows updates, and the WinXP reghack wont stay. If I enter the EnablePlainTextPassword reghack, and reboot, all is fine, until the machine is logged off or rebooted, then it reverts back to EnablePlainTextPassword=no Seems to be only affected on machines using Novell 4.83.6 SP1 client... although something else could be the cause. M...

...n this machine the user gets the message "user cannot login. check username/password/domain and be aware that username/password are casesensitive" (I translated this from german) Other users can login fine. I applied the sign-seal-regahck on this machine again and the "domain"-reghack, but it didnt help (see below for details) In the log-files I dont see anything suspicious but from the logfiles it seems that the user is authenticated sucessfully: check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [assistance] -> [assistance] -> [assistance] succeeded The eventlog on XP als...

...e statements in usenet, but I wonder if there is a kind of XP-FAQ out there. (The one at samba-page is very outdated) Especially I need to know how well XP integrates in a existing NT4-domain (samba as PDC). Then I need to know if there are any problems with fileservers (I remember rumours about reghacks one has to apply on XP to make things work) And finally - if a machine is not part of the domain (guest-laptop): if a local XP-user with user/pass similar than on samba-server is sufficient for auth on the sambaserver ? thnx, peter -- mag. peter pilsl IT-Consulting tel: +43-699-1-3574035 fax:...

...logon inherit permissions = Yes browseable = No Again, I had to turn off the max protocol = NT1 option in order to get the Windows 7 clients to connect, but I need Windows 10 clients to be able to connect. This is for both a domain-joined machine, and some stand-alone clients. The reghack for joining the domain have been applied. I have tried rebooting the server as well, so I know the services are not hanging right now. Suggestions on what to try next?

...seable = No >> >> >> Again, I had to turn off the max protocol = NT1 option in order to get the >> Windows 7 clients to connect, but I need Windows 10 clients to be able to >> connect. This is for both a domain-joined machine, and some stand-alone >> clients. The reghack for joining the domain have been applied. I have >> tried >> rebooting the server as well, so I know the services are not hanging right >> now. >> >> Suggestions on what to try next? >> > > That is the only way to get windows 10 to connect to an NT domain,...

...tocol = NT1 option in > order to get the > Windows 7 clients to connect, but I need Windows 10 > clients to be able to > connect. This is for both a domain-joined machine, and > some stand-alone > clients. The reghack for joining the domain have been > applied. I have tried > rebooting the server as well, so I know the services are > not hanging right > now. > > Suggestions on what to try next? > > > That is the only w...

...= Yes > browseable = No > > > Again, I had to turn off the max protocol = NT1 option in order to get the > Windows 7 clients to connect, but I need Windows 10 clients to be able to > connect. This is for both a domain-joined machine, and some stand-alone > clients. The reghack for joining the domain have been applied. I have tried > rebooting the server as well, so I know the services are not hanging right > now. > > Suggestions on what to try next? That is the only way to get windows 10 to connect to an NT domain, it is windows subtle way of telling you to...

"This error can occur if the drive letter you are mapping with a net use command is already mapped in the user's properties." part of the JSI FAQ at http://www.jsifaq.com/reghack.htm TO fix it, try disconnecting the drives before mapping new ones. This may or may not be the best way to fix it, but in my scripts, I use this: NET USE M: /delete /yes >nul NET USE M: \\server\share HTH... - john --On Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM +0530 Rajesh Prakasan <rprak...

I have a Redhat 7.3 server running Samba-3.0.0 installed from the binary RPM's. It's acting as a PDC with Roaming profiles. I'm not certain if what I'm seeing is actually an error or not, but perhaps someone can shed a little light on what exactly it is that I'm seeing here. I have a WinXP Pro machine that I will log into with my domain username and password. My roaming

Hi, I keep coming across this problem. Samba is samba 2.2.5 Go to join a winxp box to the domain and it all appears to work fine. When you restart you can not login because it wasn't done properly. Here are my obversations from samba. A) In the logs there is always this [2002/10/24 07:12:43.415583, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(545) Couldn't find user 'nobody' in

...>>> Again, I had to turn off the max protocol = NT1 option in order to get >>> the >>> Windows 7 clients to connect, but I need Windows 10 clients to be able to >>> connect. This is for both a domain-joined machine, and some stand-alone >>> clients. The reghack for joining the domain have been applied. I have >>> tried >>> rebooting the server as well, so I know the services are not hanging >>> right >>> now. >>> >>> Suggestions on what to try next? >>> >> >> That is the only way t...

...rks fine to resolve those names from both itself and the Win2k machine in question. Szilard: There was never a mapping on this machine though there was a 'shortcut' in "My Network Places". I got rid of that but the service to that server still doesn't work. Also, there was a reghack that I found for Win2k that added a longer timeout value to connect to this resource. That didn't help either. Any other ideas or thoughts are greatly appreciated! Paul -----Original Message----- From: Sam Barasch [mailto:barasch@biostat.wisc.edu] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: Samb...

I have a Samba server running on an AIX 4.4.3 RS6000 that has been serving up files without problem. Recently, a pair of machines, both Windows 2000 Pro, haven't been able to gain access to any of the Samba resources on the AIX server though they were both able to previously. Other WinNT and Win2k machines can get to these shared resources fine, just not these two. I haven't found anything