search for: regexps

...port/SpecialCaseList.cpp index c312cc1..2972cb1 100644 --- a/lib/Support/SpecialCaseList.cpp +++ b/lib/Support/SpecialCaseList.cpp @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ bool SpecialCaseList::parse(const MemoryBuffer *MB, std::string &Error) { // Add this regexp into the proper group by its prefix. if (!Regexps[Prefix][Category].empty()) Regexps[Prefix][Category] += "|"; - Regexps[Prefix][Category] += "^" + Regexp + "$"; + Regexps[Prefix][Category] += "^(" + Regexp + ")$)"; } return true; }

...t 1 elements, found 0. <false> is not true. There's probably something I'm not doing right, for sure. #assert_select is supposed to be so much easier to use, but I'm not find that at all. I just learned about "a[onclick*=?]", and I can make my test pass with that. But regexps sure are something I use very often. Thanks ! -- François Beausoleil http://blog.teksol.info/ http://piston.rubyforge.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To pos...

I have added regular expression support using a POSIX implementation. The patch (against 2.5.5) is attached. The implementation is simple and follows the same mechanism that is implemented for normal searches. I added these command line arguments: --rexclude=PATTERN exclude files matching regexp PATTERN --rexclude-from=FILE exclude regexp patterns listed in FILE --rinclude=PATTERN

Hello, I noticed (due to a recent post by Martin Honnen to clp) that Element.Class uses wrong regexps for its operations. E.g., Element.Class.has() will find "classA" in "classA-foobar" I also changed the interface of .has() to the more general one used in .has_any() --- util.js.old 2005-08-21 19:18:40.000000000 +0200 +++ util.js 2005-08-21 19:31:42.000000000 +0200 @@ -21...

Just a quick question or maybe a suggestion, is there a gem/plugin that will convert ruby regexp to javascript regexp? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Can somebody tell me why the following RegExp doesn''t work for date validation in Rails... It validates fine in RadRails -- using REgExp panel. Intended format: (mm/dd/yyyy): %r{^(0[1-9]|1[012])(-|/)(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])(-|/)(19|20)([0-9][0-9])$} If i try the following, it works in Rails: %r{(0[1-9]|1[012])(-|/)(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])} When I add the last piece, it

...ing the function: groupingStrings(2004:2006, 1:3) [1] "200401|200402|200403" "200501|200502|200503" "200601|200602|200603" This would yield first quarter matches for the years 2004 through 2006. My plan was to use both splitIt and groupingStrings to be able to create regexps all quarters. In addition I want it to be flexible enough for me to be able to create matching regexps for monthly, quarterly, semi-annually and annual regexps. One more example. Suppose I wanted to look at data semi-annually for 2010 through 2011. The regexps would be: "201001|201002|2010...

Environment: CentOS 4.2 (RHES4 clone) Ruby 1.8.4 Rails 1.0 I am having a small difficulty with case sensitive matching in some ruby code: f_nam_re = Regexp.new(f_nam_re_s,"x") produces these test results: The passed regexp: ^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$ The regexp used is: /^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$/i $= is false qpcccmr1 matches QPCCCMR1 matches QPCCMMR1 does not match qpCCCMR1 matches QPCCCMRC

Anyone succeeded in using regexp replacements in ENUM, like "!\\+421257296(.*)$!sip:2\\1@stuba.sk!" I can't get it to work in ASterisk. I've added '\\1' and Debug echos "1" I've added '\\\\1' and debug echoes "\1", but regexp fails to work. The example above is from the nic.at presentation, I can't get it to work. /Olle

hi all, I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest of the routing would be done at the controller level.

Sorry, meant to post this in the rails forum. Anyways, how would I write a rescue method to recover from a failed regexp parsing with error "regexp not matched" -Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post

My regexp skills are somewhere infinitesimally close to zero. I have never really 'gotten' them. That said, I have spent a couple hours already search for help to write a rewriterule that works on a string in the URL. In particular I want success if either of the following were provided: webmail.domain (e.g. webmail.foo.com) server/webmail (e.g. www.foo.com/webmail) And I have not

Does anyone have a good working e-mail validator? or even some regexp to make the validates_format_of work right... that would be awesome. Also, maybe an online tutorial for regexp. i''ve always been afraid of it but i think it''s time to face the fears. thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

..."W.m^{-2}" to "W/m2" I make the following test : gsub(glob2rx("W.m^{-2}"), "W/m2", "W.m^{-2}") but it does not seem to work. I don't know how to do it otherwise as I could never learn how to deal with the special characters (like .^{}) in regexps. Thanks from advance for your kindly help servet

...asterisk has a problem with this since it parses the brackets differently, i've also tried to do it like: exten => _X.,1,GotoIf($[${EXTEN} : 234\[2-6\]]?jump:) but of course this didn't work(was a desperate try anyways). is there a way to match a range like it is possible with unix regexps (a-zA-Z1-9)? thanks for your replies! christian

Hey, Does anybody have a regexp for validating URLs? I found this one and am trying to adapt it: ^(((ht|f)tp(s?))\:\/\/)?(www.|[a-zA-Z].)[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+\.(com|edu|gov|mil|net|org|biz|info|name|museum|us|ca|uk)(\:[0-9]+)*(/($|[a-zA-Z0-9\.\,\;\?\''\\\+&%\$#\=~_\-]+))*$ (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Web_Languages/JavaScript/Q_21245168.html) I also found this one, but, um,

I have two vectors, a and b. b is a text file. I want to find in b those elements of a which occur at the beginning of the line in b. I have the following code, but it only returns a value for the first value in a, but I want both. Any ideas please. a = c(2,3) b = NULL b[1] = "aaa 2 aaa" b[2] = "2 aaa" b[3] = "3 aaa" b[4] = "aaa 3 aaa"

I tried: RewriteRule ^webmail\.|/webmail https://%{SERVER_NAME}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R] But that does not rewrite for http://webmail.domain On 02/22/2017 06:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Seems I left off one point in this message. > > This is to refine these rules in my Apache server. > > RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} !^443$ > RewriteRule ^.*$

v1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-September/msg00135.html This is a more complete evolution of the earlier patch. It replaces most important uses of Str with PCRE throughout the code. It also extends the bindings with some useful features like case-insensitive regexps. The main places I *didn't* touch are the generator (GObject uses Str extensively); and common/mlstdutils which cannot use PCRE because it cannot depend on C code. But pretty much everything else has been converted now. - - - Same question as before: > I wonder if there was a deep reas...

Hmmm, maybe I spoke too soon, why the second test didn't match isn't obvious to me (unless Apache regex is different from grep). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leroy Tennison" <leroy at datavoiceint.com> To: "centos" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 10:15:54 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] help with RewriteRule regexp And it won't