search for: regcontext

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 59 matches for "regcontext".

2006 Dec 05
2
regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload and doesn't come back
Hi All, I just noticed something interesting. When a sip device registers and regcontext is setup in sip.conf, a NoOp priority 1 extension is dynamically created in the dialplan within the specified regcontext. Works great. If for some reason, modification is made to the extension.conf and a >reload extension is performed, those dynamically created extensions in the regcontext vani...
2006 Oct 06
3
regexten & regcontext broken for SIP?
Hi ho, is there anyone out here that is making use of the regcontext and regexten settings in sip.conf? I've tried this on two Asterisk boxes (1.2.10 and 1.2.12.1) and in both cases I don't see the Noop priority 1 being created upon SIP client registration, "show dialplan xxx" reveals no change. And yes, I have also read and checked bug 7144;...
2006 Mar 16
0
Regcontext, only 1 context available?
Hi All, I'm working with regcontext and sip users/peers. In the wiki, the example shows you can put this parameter in the [sipuser] context, like so: [general] lots of general parameters [sipuser] regcontext=siptest regexten=1234 Now this does not create the Noop exten priority 1 in the dial plan when the sip user registers. Now...
2006 Jun 08
1
Using regcontext
Hello List Ive been trying to use regcontext, but I cant get it to work. Ive setup my sip peers to have the regexten _[0-9]., so that I can capture all registrations in a single extension. But when they register, I can see that the dynamic extension is created, but none of the rest of the code is executed, priority 2-4. Can anyone explain how...
2006 Dec 05
0
Re: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload, WORKING
OK this was an easy one to fix. All I had to do is RTFM. Note on the wiki: ATTENTION: Make sure you take a look at bug report 7144 Just do what Kevin said, include the regcontext in whatever static context you have the priority 2 extension and don't make a static regcontext in extension.conf. Let sip module do the rest. Works great. Thanks Guys. JR On 12/5/06, JR Richardson <jmr.richardson@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Let me guess: The context in wh...
2009 Aug 07
1
regcontext regexten
Hi Anyone know how to use regcontext et regexten parameter from sip.conf and can give an example ? thx regards Harry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090807/ef9ba45e/attachment.htm
2008 Oct 07
1
regcontext
hi all, just wondering what's happening here: i have a pap2 and an spa941. everytime i call my spa from my pap2 i can see it being added dynamically on the regcontext: [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Saved useragent "Linksys/SPA942-5.2.8" for peer 100100 [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Added extension '100100' priority 1 to sipregcontext but from spa to pap2 i dont see it, i looked at the difference on the config, under SIP: On PAP2: Handle VIA receiv...
2014 Oct 04
1
Pjsip and regcontext (for DUNDi)
...7/Using_DUNDi_with_a_Cluster_of_Asterisk_Servers.pdf Its seems a really neat solution and I'm keen to implement something similar, however I believe it was written before the pjsip channel driver and I've hit a potential issue I think. The guides for configuring DUNDi seem to suggest using regcontext in sip.conf: [general] regcontext=sipregistration However I can't seem to find an equivalent declaration for pjsip.conf. So my questions are: 1) Is there a way to achieve the same functionality with pjsip? 2) Is DUNDi still being maintained and used? If so, then how should it be configured...
2005 Oct 08
0
Regcontext/regexten broken??
Recently I've noticed two bits of odd behavior with respect to regcontext/regexten in CVS HEAD & 1.2 Beta1, and I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on this. I've set up a regcontext in sip.conf. I've set up two users with regexten entries, one in sip.conf and one in a mysql realtime table. The first bit of oddness is that regexten seems to work...
2006 Jun 08
0
SV: Using regcontext
...ce feature though. Jon -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] P? vegne af Olle E Johansson Sendt: 8. juni 2006 12:09 Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Emne: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Using regcontext 8 jun 2006 kl. 11.57 skrev Jon Sch?pzinsky: > Hello List > > Ive been trying to use regcontext, but I cant get it to work. Ive > setup my sip peers to have the regexten _[0-9]., so that I can > capture all registrations in a single extension. > But when they register, I can...
2006 Dec 05
0
RE: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > JR Richardson > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:49 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] RE: regcontext,NoOp extension > vanishes when extension reload > > > > > Let me guess: The context in which you have the 2 thru n > priorities > > is the same one as you're using for regcontext right? > > > > Don't do that, bad things will happen (as you've...
2006 Mar 13
0
Re: Regexten & Regcontext, working now
Just figured it out, I think. I put regcontext=mycontext into the [general] section in sip.conf instead of the the [user] section and when the sip user registered, the NoOp extension priority 1 came right up in the dial plan. All is well again, so far. Clarity of sight becomes infinitely greater with head removed from rectum. >> >...
2006 Dec 05
0
RE: regcontext, NoOp extension vanishes when extension reload
> > Let me guess: The context in which you have the 2 thru n priorities is > the same one as you're using for regcontext right? > > Don't do that, bad things will happen (as you've noticed). > > I'd have to review the code again, but I think what you're seeing is as > a result of this. > > Regards, > - Brad > No, not exactly, I have a catchall match in the regext priority 2...
2007 Oct 06
1
DUNDi, regcontext, softphones.. fail.
> I'm having an issue deploying softphones into my DUNDi/regcontext > setup. My current design is that all SIP users get registered into a > sipregistration context in the sip.conf. I then have a dialplan > function that includes that and does the dial: > > include => sipregistration > exten => _XXXX,2,Answer() > exten => _XXXX,3,Wa...
2006 Mar 13
0
Regexten & Regcontext
Hi All, I've been trying to get regexten and regcontext going for some sip peers but following the examples on the wiki is not working, as far as I can tell, nothing is happening. the phone registers, sip show peers is ok, but the NoOp priority 1 extension never gets created or added to the dialplan. Has anyone got this working? Thanks. JR JR Richa...
2007 Oct 05
0
DUNDi, regcontext, softphones.. fail. :(
All, I'm having an issue deploying softphones into my DUNDi/regcontext setup. My current design is that all SIP users get registered into a sipregistration context in the sip.conf. I then have a dialplan function that includes that and does the dial: include => sipregistration exten => _XXXX,2,Answer() exten => _XXXX,3,Wait(1) exten => _XXXX,4,NoOp(sipr...
2006 Feb 23
6
username as extension
Is there a way to have extensions automatically created for registered sip users ? I did some investigation and found some hope in chan_sip with relation to the somewhat undocumented usereqphone option but i may be totally off track. All i want to be able to do is send a call to number@ip_address where the number is the username configured on the phone that has registered with asterisk
2006 Nov 01
2
Realtime, DUNDi and regexten
It seems that when you use Realtime static and possibly realtime realtime for sip users, that Asterisk fails to create the regexten context for DUNDi. Someone else had the same problem back in July. Doesn't look like they ever had a resolution. <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-July/160105.html>
2005 Dec 11
14
Regexten
Before I play around with this again in 1.2.1, regexten is still essentially broken, correct? The misconception seems to be that it allows you to execute a command upon registration from a SIP UA. Even the O'Reilly TFOT book erroneously states that this is what it is for. After reading the developer discussion though, it definitely seems to be broken. Is it fixed yet? Doug.
2006 Nov 30
4
Trouble with regexten
Can anyone help with the use of regexten? (* 1.4.3) I've got Asterisk creating extensions for my SIP phones using regexten but I can't seem to figure out how to make use of them once they're registered. Here's my dialplan for from-sip (the SIP's default context): asterisk*CLI> dialplan show from-sip [ Context 'from-sip' created by 'pbx_config' ]