search for: regain

Earl Chew wrote: > That being said, I think my patch leaves us better off than before ! I agree. We will add it as it is and then tweak futher as needed. Earl, would you be able to update your patch so that it applies against the current git master? Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

...me virt_images. Stopping local bricks. Dec 20 17:22:06 virt2 systemd[1]: Started GlusterFS, a clustered file-system server. Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.387238] C [MSGID: 106003] [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] 0-management: Server quorum regained for volume filserver. Starting local bricks. Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.390417] C [MSGID: 106003] [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] 0-management: Server quorum regained for volume virt_images. Starting local bricks. -- Reboot -- Dec 20...

Hi all, In the last couple of months, there have been two proposed patches for the regain play analysis code. The first by Nathan Rennie-Waldock: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html simply adds some more higher sample rates. The second by Earl Chew: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html is more comprehensive. Neithe...

Hello Earl, I used your patches while they cleanly applied to the Git tree. There is one question though, what do you think of?. http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=84086&st=0&p=782407&#entry782407 which apparently states (if I understand correctly) that your approach is not completely correct. Kind regards, Michael -------------- next part -------------- An

...is probably not even close to being optimal. That being said, I think my patch leaves us better off than before ! Earl ________________________________ From: Michael Guntsche <mike at it-loops.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:30:36 PM Subject: [flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches Hello Earl, I used your patches while they cleanly applied to the Git tree. There is one question though, what do you think of?. http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=84086&st=0&p=782407&#entry782407 which apparently states (if I understand...

...some small image files in the repository as a precedent.) Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 12:51:22 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches Earl Chew wrote: > That being said, I think my patch leaves us better off than before ! I agree. We will add it as it is and then tweak futher as needed. Earl, would you be able to update your patch so that it applies against the current git master? Cheers, Erik -- --...

...tests increase the runtime of test_metaflac.sh from 11s to 15s on my machine. What are your thoughts ? Earl ----- Original Message ----- From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 12:41:51 AM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches Earl Chew wrote: > Erik, > > Ok. I've updated the patches, and made some additions to the test harness. > > For the test harness, I used sox to generate 1kHz wav files over a range of > sampling rates. The test harness runs the replaygain analysis, an...

...? sample; ? scale = s; } Are you ok with bc(1) ??? Or would you prefer perl(1) ??? Or something else ? Earl ----- Original Message ----- From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 6:52:34 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches Brian Willoughby wrote: > What about using the C library sin() and cos() functions to generate? > the test audio instead of sox?? I did not see a description of how? > the test files are generated, so maybe this is easy or maybe it is? > hard.? The benefit of...

..., byte[bx]); ??????????????????? } ??????????? } ??? }'? /dev/null ----- Original Message ----- From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:30:00 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches Earl Chew wrote: > I'm a little reluctant to introduce another compiled program when there are > so many other options that will work well enough out of the box. > > Here are two ideas: > > 1. Use bc(1) to compute the raw samples > 2. Use perl(1) t...

...bricks. > Dec 20 17:22:06 virt2 systemd[1]: Started GlusterFS, a clustered > file-system server. > Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.387238] C > [MSGID: 106003] > [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] > 0-management: Server quorum regained for volume filserver. Starting > local bricks. > Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.390417] C > [MSGID: 106003] > [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] > 0-management: Server quorum regained for volume virt_images. Starting > loca...

Earl Chew wrote: > Erik, > > Ok. I've updated the patches, and made some additions to the test harness. > > For the test harness, I used sox to generate 1kHz wav files over a range of > sampling rates. The test harness runs the replaygain analysis, and compares > the resulting metadata. > > Are you ok with this approach ?? It means that the wav files need to be

Earl Chew wrote: > One per filter table entry. That's 12 files right now. Thats probably a bit much. > The files could be generated on the fly, but that would either require > another program or script (eg Perl), Anything but Perl. I can write Perl but I can't read it :-). > or a dependence on an external toolkit such as sox. I'd be ok with requiring sox to run the

Brian Willoughby wrote: > What about using the C library sin() and cos() functions to generate > the test audio instead of sox? I did not see a description of how > the test files are generated, so maybe this is easy or maybe it is > hard. The benefit of shipping the test audio generation source code > around with the FLAC sources is that the tests won't break when

Hey, Can you give us the volume info output for this volume? Why are you not able to get the xattrs from arbiter brick? It is the same way as you do it on data bricks. The changelog xattrs are named trusted.afr.virt_images-client-{1,2,3} in the getxattr outputs you have provided. Did you do a remove-brick and add-brick any time? Otherwise it will be trusted.afr.virt_images-client-{0,1,2} usually.

Earl Chew wrote: > I'm a little reluctant to introduce another compiled program when there are > so many other options that will work well enough out of the box. > > Here are two ideas: > > 1. Use bc(1) to compute the raw samples > 2. Use perl(1) to compute the raw samples > > To generate raw unsigned samples using bc(1) for example: > > samplerate = 1000;

What about using the C library sin() and cos() functions to generate the test audio instead of sox? I did not see a description of how the test files are generated, so maybe this is easy or maybe it is hard. The benefit of shipping the test audio generation source code around with the FLAC sources is that the tests won't break when sox is modified. Brian Willoughby Sound

Application is working on Windows but when I run on RedHat10 under Wine 1.1.15. It looses focus and underlying Linux applications to get the keystrokes from the keyboard. Clicking on the application we're trying to run or switching with ALT+TAB doesn't not give it the focus back. The parameters we're running Wine are: Allow the window manager to decorate the windows : OFF Allow the

...17:22:06 virt2 systemd[1]: Started GlusterFS, a clustered >> file-system server. >> Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.387238] C >> [MSGID: 106003] >> [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] >> 0-management: Server quorum regained for volume filserver. Starting >> local bricks. >> Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.390417] C >> [MSGID: 106003] >> [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] >> 0-management: Server quorum regained for volume virt_images...

...]: Started GlusterFS, a clustered > >> file-system server. > >> Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.387238] C > >> [MSGID: 106003] > >> [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] > >> 0-management: Server quorum regained for volume filserver. Starting > >> local bricks. > >> Dec 20 17:22:11 virt2 glusterd[739]: [2017-12-20 16:22:11.390417] C > >> [MSGID: 106003] > >> [glusterd-server-quorum.c:349:glusterd_do_volume_quorum_action] > >> 0-management: Server quorum regain...

...other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to correct this so I'm wondering, if I had mounted that vdi as a secondary device on another VM, browsed the file system and delete /etc/shadow would this have wiped all users passwords meaning I could regain access again? (This is past tense because its sorted now but I'm curious if this would have worked? And if not, what could I have done?). -- Regards, James. http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand Vigesimal, and J others...?