Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "reg_pend".
Did you mean:
reg_end
2009 Aug 27
2
[LLVMdev] Regular Expression lib support
...nts? Also, I'd prefer more LLVM style and less Unix
>> style enum names, IgnoreCase for example.
>>
>> Does NOSPEC actually ever make sense to use? Wouldn't clients just use string
>> compare?
>>
>
> Indeed, it is worthless for LLVM.
> There's also REG_PEND (non-POSIX, but this impl. supports it) that
> allows matching patterns
> with embedded NULs. Would that be needed/useful for LLVM?
Maybe? If its already there and we are fine using this version of the
lib always then we might as well include it.
>>> + // notbol: The match-begin...
2009 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] Regular Expression lib support
...nd less Unix
>>> style enum names, IgnoreCase for example.
>>>
>>> Does NOSPEC actually ever make sense to use? Wouldn't clients just use string
>>> compare?
>>>
>>>
>> Indeed, it is worthless for LLVM.
>> There's also REG_PEND (non-POSIX, but this impl. supports it) that
>> allows matching patterns
>> with embedded NULs. Would that be needed/useful for LLVM?
>>
>
> Maybe? If its already there and we are fine using this version of the
> lib always then we might as well include it.
>...
2009 Aug 28
3
[LLVMdev] Regular Expression lib support
...> style enum names, IgnoreCase for example.
>>>>
>>>> Does NOSPEC actually ever make sense to use? Wouldn't clients just use string
>>>> compare?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Indeed, it is worthless for LLVM.
>>> There's also REG_PEND (non-POSIX, but this impl. supports it) that
>>> allows matching patterns
>>> with embedded NULs. Would that be needed/useful for LLVM?
>>>
>>
>> Maybe? If its already there and we are fine using this version of the
>> lib always then we might as well in...
2009 Aug 25
0
[LLVMdev] Regular Expression lib support
...> Can you make these doxyments? Also, I'd prefer more LLVM style and less Unix
> style enum names, IgnoreCase for example.
>
> Does NOSPEC actually ever make sense to use? Wouldn't clients just use string
> compare?
>
Indeed, it is worthless for LLVM.
There's also REG_PEND (non-POSIX, but this impl. supports it) that
allows matching patterns
with embedded NULs. Would that be needed/useful for LLVM?
>
>> +
>> + Regex(const char *regex, unsigned Flags=NOSUB);
>> + ~Regex();
>>
>
> I think this should have an "bool is...
2009 Aug 25
6
[LLVMdev] Regular Expression lib support
Woot! Thanks a bunch Edwin!
Some comments on the patch:
--
I'm not sure if it makes sense to import the man pages, if we only
expose Regex.h.
> diff --git a/include/llvm/Support/Regex.h b/include/llvm/Support/Regex.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..314bff4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/llvm/Support/Regex.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +//===-- Regex.h - Regular