search for: reg_i

Thanks for all the hints Jakob, I've added the following piece of code after the spill code handling inside selectOrSplit() (ignoring some control logic): for (LiveIntervals::const_iterator I = LIS->begin(), E = LIS->end(); I != E; ++I) { unsigned VirtReg = I->first; if ((TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(VirtReg)) && (VRM->getPhys(VirtReg)

On Nov 30, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > Thanks for all the hints Jakob, I've added the following piece of code after the spill code handling inside selectOrSplit() (ignoring some control logic): > > for (LiveIntervals::const_iterator I = LIS->begin(), E = LIS->end(); I != E; > ++I) > { > unsigned VirtReg = I->first; > if

...r6 ## E,4(r9); \ >> movl r7 ## E,8(r9); \ >> movl r8 ## E,12(r9); \ >> + popq RBASE; \ >> ret; \ >> ENDPROC(FUNC); >> >> +#define round_mov(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ >> + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ >> + movl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; >> + >> +#define round_xor(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ >> + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ >> + xorl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; >> + >> #define round(TA...

...r6 ## E,4(r9); \ >> movl r7 ## E,8(r9); \ >> movl r8 ## E,12(r9); \ >> + popq RBASE; \ >> ret; \ >> ENDPROC(FUNC); >> >> +#define round_mov(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ >> + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ >> + movl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; >> + >> +#define round_xor(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ >> + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ >> + xorl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; >> + >> #define round(TA...

...,r5,r6,r7,r8,r9,r10,r11) \ ENTRY(FUNC); \ + pushq RBASE; \ movq r1,r2; \ leaq KEY+48(r8),r9; \ movq r10,r11; \ @@ -74,54 +78,63 @@ movl r6 ## E,4(r9); \ movl r7 ## E,8(r9); \ movl r8 ## E,12(r9); \ + popq RBASE; \ ret; \ ENDPROC(FUNC); +#define round_mov(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ + movl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; + +#define round_xor(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ + xorl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; + #define round(TAB,OFFSET,r1,r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,r7,r8,ra,rb,rc,rd) \ movzbl r2 ## H,r5 ## E; \ movzbl r2 ## L,r6 ## E...

...\ > movq r1,r2; \ > leaq KEY+48(r8),r9; \ > movq r10,r11; \ > @@ -74,54 +78,63 @@ > movl r6 ## E,4(r9); \ > movl r7 ## E,8(r9); \ > movl r8 ## E,12(r9); \ > + popq RBASE; \ > ret; \ > ENDPROC(FUNC); > > +#define round_mov(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ > + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ > + movl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; > + > +#define round_xor(tab_off, reg_i, reg_o) \ > + leaq tab_off(%rip), RBASE; \ > + xorl (RBASE,reg_i,4), reg_o; > + > #define round(TAB,OFFSET,r1,r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,r7,r8,ra,rb,rc,rd) \ > movzb...

On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > Yes, I want the register to be allocatable when there are no stack frames used in the function so it can be used for other purposes. In fact, I looked at how other backends solve this problem, but they are all too conservative by always reserving the register which in my case it is not a good solution because of the performance impact of not

Yes, I want the register to be allocatable when there are no stack frames used in the function so it can be used for other purposes. In fact, I looked at how other backends solve this problem, but they are all too conservative by always reserving the register which in my case it is not a good solution because of the performance impact of not having this register available. I find very interesting

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

Changes: - patch v3: - Update on message to describe longer term PIE goal. - Minor change on ftrace if condition. - Changed code using xchgq. - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace