Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "reg100".
Did you mean:
reg1030
2002 Sep 28
2
[LLVMdev] Directory and library rename:
By request, I've renamed lib/CodeGen/PreSelection to lib/CodeGen/PreOpts
(admittedly this was my choice :-), and the corresponding archive from
preselect to preopt. If you see linker errors saying preselect.o is not
found, this is the reason. This shouldn't happen if you update your entire
tree at once.
--Vikram
2002 Sep 29
1
[LLVMdev] the getelementptr noop problem
> so i confess i'm still not clear on what the first index into
> getelementptr is all about.
I'm sure you're not the only one. :) This is one of the wierdest aspects
of LLVM to the unaccustomed.
> it makes perfect sense for an example like
> getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100
> to just return a %mystruct * equivalent to %reg100.
>
> it does *not* make sense to me that
> getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100, uint 0
> should act the same. for look, what this speaks of to me is indexing the
> first element in an array. if we are careful to cast it back to...
2002 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] the getelementptr noop problem
so i confess i'm still not clear on what the first index into
getelementptr is all about.
it makes perfect sense for an example like
getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100
to just return a %mystruct * equivalent to %reg100.
it does *not* make sense to me that
getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100, uint 0
should act the same. for look, what this speaks of to me is indexing the
first element in an array. if we are careful to cast it back to %mystruct
*, then it should *...