search for: refreserv

...an0/fs/bar-001__compression__________ off____________________default zsan0/fs/bar-001__readonly______________off____________________default zsan0/fs/bar-001__shareiscsi____________off____________________default zsan0/fs/bar-001__copies________________1______________________default zsan0/fs/bar-001__refreservation________400G__________________ local zsan0/fs/bar-001__primarycache__________all____________________default zsan0/fs/bar-001__secondarycache________all____________________default zsan0/fs/bar-001__usedbysnapshots______ 0______________________- zsan0/fs/bar-001__usedbydataset________ 280G_______...

Hi, My swap is on raidz1. Df -k and swap -l are showing almost no usage of swap, while zfs list and zpool list are showing me 96% capacity. Which should i believe? Justin # df -hk Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c3t0d0s1 14G 4.0G 10G 28% / /devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices ctfs

Do we have enormous fragmentation here on our X4500 with Solaris 10, ZFS Version 10? What except zfs send/receive can be done to free the fragmented space? One ZFS was used for some month to store some large disk images (each 50GByte large) which are copied there with rsync. This ZFS then reports 6.39TByte usage with zfs list and only 2TByte usage with du. The other ZFS was used for similar

...default home1/home1mm01 compression gzip-1 inherited from home1 home1/home1mm01 readonly off default home1/home1mm01 shareiscsi off default home1/home1mm01 copies 1 default home1/home1mm01 refreservation 0 default Yet used (14902492672) * compresratio (11.20) = 166907917926 which is 3.6% larger than volsize. Is this a bug or a feature for sparse volumes? If a feature, how much larger than volsize/compressratio can the actual used storage space grow? e.g., fixed amou...

...sers vscan off default remotepool/users nbmand on received remotepool/users sharesmb name=users,guestok=true received remotepool/users refquota none default remotepool/users refreservation none default remotepool/users primarycache all default remotepool/users secondarycache all default remotepool/users usedbysnapshots 0 - remotepool/users usedbydataset 9...

...default rpool/pnfsds compression off default rpool/pnfsds zoned off default rpool/pnfsds copies 1 default rpool/pnfsds refquota none default rpool/pnfsds refreservation none default rpool/pnfsds sharepnfs off default rpool/pnfsds mds none default Thanks, Lisa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris...

I''ve noticed that the dsl_dataset_t that points to a given dataset changes during the life time of a ''zfs create'' command. We start out with one dsl_dataset_t* during dmu_objset_create_sync() but by the time we are later mounting the dataset we have a different in memory dsl_dataset_t* referring to the same dataset. This causes me a big issue with per dataset

...y sensitive - pool1/fs1 vscan off default pool1/fs1 nbmand off default pool1/fs1 sharesmb off default pool1/fs1 refquota none default pool1/fs1 refreservation none default pool1/fs1 primarycache all default pool1/fs1 secondarycache all default pool1/fs1 usedbysnapshots 0 - pool1/fs1 usedbydataset 21K - pool1/fs1 u...

...data/admin/ENS vscan off default fsdata/admin/ENS nbmand off default fsdata/admin/ENS sharesmb off default fsdata/admin/ENS refquota none default fsdata/admin/ENS refreservation none default fsdata/admin/ENS primarycache all default fsdata/admin/ENS secondarycache all default fsdata/admin/ENS usedbysnapshots 0 - fsdata/admin/ENS usedbydataset 73.6G...

...zfs create -V 1M pool/foo dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/zvol/rdsk/pool/foo bs=1k count=1k (using Nevada b94) yields zfs get all pool/foo pool/foo used 1,09M - pool/foo referenced 1,09M - pool/foo volsize 1M - pool/foo refreservation 1M local Why is ''referenced'' bigger than ''volsize''? Is this a bug or a feature? Regards, gero42 PS: It''s good to see that the EOF bug is fixed with b94. Before that I could dd 1T of data in a 1M volume... This message...

I am getting the following erorr message when trying to do a zfs snapshot: root at pluto#zfs snapshot datapool/mars at backup1 cannot create snapshot ''datapool/mars at backup1'': out of space root at pluto#zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT datapool 556G 110G 446G 19% ONLINE - rpool 278G 12.5G 265G 4% ONLINE - Any ideas??? -------------- next part

...fault tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 nbmand off default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 sharesmb off default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 refquota none default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 refreservation none default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 primarycache all default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 secondarycache all default tank/lxc/tipper/brick1 usedbysnapshots 0...

...nsitive - storagepool/ndc vscan off default storagepool/ndc nbmand off default storagepool/ndc sharesmb off default storagepool/ndc refquota none default storagepool/ndc refreservation none default -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/ No longer exists. Is there a bug for this yet? -- Ian.

...------------------------- 1 Initial ZFS version 2 Ditto blocks (replicated metadata) 3 Hot spares and double parity RAID-Z 4 zpool history 5 Compression using the gzip algorithm 6 bootfs pool property 7 Separate intent log devices 8 Delegated administration 9 refquota and refreservation properties 10 Cache devices 11 Improved scrub performance 12 Snapshot properties 13 snapused property For more information on a particular version, including supported releases, see: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/N Where ''N'' is the version number...

...------------------------- 1 Initial ZFS version 2 Ditto blocks (replicated metadata) 3 Hot spares and double parity RAID-Z 4 zpool history 5 Compression using the gzip algorithm 6 bootfs pool property 7 Separate intent log devices 8 Delegated administration 9 refquota and refreservation properties 10 Cache devices 11 Improved scrub performance 12 Snapshot properties 13 snapused property 14 passthrough-x aclinherit 15 user/group space accounting For more information on a particular version, including supported releases, see: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community...

...off default rpool nbmand off default rpool sharesmb off default rpool refquota none default rpool refreservation none default rpool primarycache all default rpool secondarycache all default rpool usedbysnapshots 0 - rpool...

...- zhome/username vscan off default zhome/username nbmand off default zhome/username sharesmb off default zhome/username refquota none default zhome/username refreservation none default zhome/username primarycache all default zhome/username secondarycache all default zhome/username usedbysnapshots 0 - zhome/username usedbydataset 750M...

...nsitive - data/mysqldata3 vscan off default data/mysqldata3 nbmand off default data/mysqldata3 sharesmb off default data/mysqldata3 refquota none default data/mysqldata3 refreservation none default MySQL Conf Detail: ... [mysqld3] lower_case_table_names=1 user=mysql port = 3308 socket = /usr/local/mysql/sock/mysql3.sock pid-file=/usr/local/mysql/sock/mysql3.pid datadir=/data/mysqldata3/mydata tmpdir =/data/mysqldata3/tmpdir skip-locking skip-name-resolve...

Good morning everybody I was migrating my ufs ? rootfilesystem to a zfs ? one, but was a little upset finding out that it became bigger (what was clear because of the swap and dump size). Now I am questioning myself if it is possible to set the swap and dump size by using the lucreate ? command (I wanna try it again but on less space). Unfortunately I did not find any advice in manpages.