search for: reformulate

Hi, i'm trying to simplify some R code but i got stucked in this: test<-data.frame(cbind(id,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7)) test > test id x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 1 1 36 26 21 32 31 27 31 2 2 45 21 46 50 22 36 29 3 3 49 47 35 44 33 31 46 4 4 42 32 38 28 39 45 32 5 5 29 42 39 48 25 35 34 6 6 39 31 30 37 46 43 44 7 7 41 40 25 23 42 40 24 8 8 27 29 47 34 26 38 28 9 9 25 35 29 36

...; > which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise > > 'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols) > > can be handled by protecting them with backticks (``) > > > ## using non-syntactic names: > > reformulate(c("`P/E`", "`% Growth`"), response = as.name("+-")) > > > It seems to me there could be room for a *documentation* patch (stating > > explicitly that if termlabels has length > 1 its elements are > > concatenated with "+",...

...suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples, which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise 'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols) can be handled by protecting them with backticks (``) ## using non-syntactic names: reformulate(c("`P/E`", "`% Growth`"), response = as.name("+-")) It seems to me there could be room for a *documentation* patch (stating explicitly that if termlabels has length > 1 its elements are concatenated with "+", and explicitly stating that non-syntactic name...

...ing opened at delete.response.Rd:78:63) In addition: Warning message: In parse_Rd("/u/maechler/R/D/r-devel/R/src/library/stats/man/delete.response.Rd", : newline within quoted string at delete.response.Rd:74 and even I needed more than a minute to find out that the culprit was that reformulate(sprintf("`%s`", x)) is not ok in *.Rd and must be reformulate(sprintf("`\%s`", x)) --------- > (I think .txt files work OK as attachments to the list?) yes, typically -- what really counts is if your e-mail program marks them with MIME-type 'text/plain' a...

...bliquely) in the examples, > which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise > 'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols) > can be handled by protecting them with backticks (``) > ## using non-syntactic names: > reformulate(c("`P/E`", "`% Growth`"), response = as.name("+-")) > It seems to me there could be room for a *documentation* patch (stating > explicitly that if termlabels has length > 1 its elements are > concatenated with "+", and explicitly stat...

...> In addition: Warning message: > In parse_Rd("/u/maechler/R/D/r-devel/R/src/library/stats/man/delete.response.Rd", : > newline within quoted string at delete.response.Rd:74 > > and even I needed more than a minute to find out that the > culprit was that > > reformulate(sprintf("`%s`", x)) > > is not ok in *.Rd and must be > > reformulate(sprintf("`\%s`", x)) > > --------- > > > (I think .txt files work OK as attachments to the list?) > > yes, typically -- what really counts is if your e-mail program >...

...>> parse_Rd("/u/maechler/R/D/r-devel/R/src/library/stats/man/delete.response.Rd",? >> : >> ?? newline within quoted string at delete.response.Rd:74 >> >> and even I needed more than a minute to find out that the >> culprit was that >> >> ?? reformulate(sprintf("`%s`", x)) >> >> is not ok in *.Rd? and must be >> >> ?? reformulate(sprintf("`\%s`", x)) >> >> --------- >> >> ?? > (I think .txt files work OK as attachments to the list?) >> >> yes, typically -- what real...

Greetings, I am having trouble getting the function reformulate_ATSP_as_TSP to work for me. I have provided a simple example of some of the code I've been using. In particular, I'm not sure why I'm getting the error "Error in dimnames(tsp) <- list(lab, lab) : length of 'dimnames' [1] not equal to array extent" since I cr...

...direction to developers. I don't mind whichever is preferred here. Best, Saren On 29.03.19 09:29, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Saren Tasciyan >>>>>> on Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:02:10 +0100 writes: > > Hi, > > I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I > > was wondering, where I can submit it? > > > Best, > > Saren > > > Well, you could have given a small reproducible example > depicting the bug, notably when posting here: > Just a prose text with no R code...

...performance > issues, will not break in unusual cases ... ? -- Saren Tasciyan /PhD Student / Sixt Group/ Institute of Science and Technology Austria Am Campus 1 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: reformulate_solution.txt URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20190418/766f0577/attachment.txt>

Hi, I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I was wondering, where I can submit it? Best, Saren -- Saren Tasciyan /PhD Student / Sixt Group/ Institute of Science and Technology Austria Am Campus 1 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria

>>>>> Saren Tasciyan >>>>> on Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:02:10 +0100 writes: > Hi, > I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I > was wondering, where I can submit it? > Best, > Saren Well, you could have given a small reproducible example depicting the bug, notably when posting here: Just a prose text with no R code or other technical content is almost always...

...er is preferred here. > > Best, > > Saren > > > On 29.03.19 09:29, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Saren Tasciyan >>>>>>> ???? on Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:02:10 +0100 writes: >> ???? > Hi, >> ???? > I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I >> ???? > was wondering, where I can submit it? >> >> ???? > Best, >> ???? > Saren >> >> >> Well, you could have given a small reproducible example >> depicting the bug, notably when posting here: >&g...

First I wanted to thank both Marc Schwartz Greg Snow and for their reply. Then I needed to add a level of complexity to the problem. I would be able to create the biggest possible matrix. In other way does it exist a method to ask smthing like the following : max number of rows for a matrix if column=x? Thank you ------------------------------------------------------ Passa a Infostrada.

...s smart as" SCEV in most cases. > > — Sanjoy SCEV is super useful as an analysis without SCEVExpander. The only real issue with SCEV itself is invalidating the expressions. I’ve always thought SCEVExpander is very dangerous to use directly. Ideally the SCEV expression should always be reformulated based on existing IR values before expanding. It would be nice if that was provided as a layer of functionality on top of SCEVExpander. -Andy

...e code in models.R <<>>= `[.terms` <- function (termobj, i) { ??? resp <- if (attr(termobj, "response")) termobj[[2L]] ??? newformula <- attr(termobj, "term.labels")[i] ??? if (length(newformula) == 0L) newformula <- "1" ??? newformula <- reformulate(newformula, resp, attr(termobj, "intercept"), environment(termobj)) ??? result <- terms(newformula, specials = names(attr(termobj, "specials"))) ??? # Edit the optional attributes } @ The use of reformulate() is a nice trick.? However, the index reported in the specials...

Hey! Our flac's official website is looking so old, isn't it? Let's reformulate it. I wanna do this, anyone else? Regards, Lucas Correia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20091118/cabc7c52/attachment.htm

Has anyone had success using Sun ONE as an LDAP (authentication) back-end to Samba (preferably 4.0, but 3.3 would be fine)? I've found people who've tried and given up. Sun itself hasn't provided answers, but I haven't given up on them; I'll keep reformulating my questions, and asking again. One speculation on my part is that, if I can just figure out where in Sun ONE the

Dear all, As our previous email did not get any response, we try again with a reformulated question! We are trying to do something which needs an efficient loop over a huge array, possibly functions such as apply and related (tapply, lapply...?), but can't really understand syntax and examples in practice...i.e. cant' make it work. to be more specific: we are trying to apply...

...the > work for hardware loop generation. I have thought about it, but I > won't be able to do anything in the short term. > > -Krzysztof > I think a first and useful step would be to let targets optionally have the loop induction variable which controls the back-branching be reformulated as a decrement towards zero with a -1 step. Should this be an extension of LSR, or should it be a simple beginning of a HW-loop pass running after it? /Jonas