search for: refetching

...ply cleanly to 4.0-testing and should IMO be backported unchanged: changeset: 22425:d6c2695f05eb user: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell at citrix.com> date: Tue Nov 23 19:29:13 2010 +0000 files: tools/Makefile description: tools: fetch remote changesets when force refetching/resetting qemu changeset: 22381:2bedffabbcab user: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell at citrix.com> date: Tue Nov 09 18:15:25 2010 +0000 files: Makefile tools/Makefile description: tools: provide explicit target for refetching/resetting qemu changeset: 22153:9...

Hello, One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4, ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three packages, so they are

...he Z flag)? 3. If S=<size> *is* needed, is there a way to minimize the effect from the mail client's perspective? From my testruns, it seems Mutt have no problems after I rename the basename, but Thunderbird will refetch the emails, and not delete the old ones, showing duplicate emails. Refetching emails is not a big problem, I think, but only if the email clients understand that the old ones doesn't exist anymore. And if anyone has ideas on how to convert to using zlib without the users knowing, I would be glad to hear it! -- Helge Milde www.monsternett.no

Can someone explain why a instance variable cannot be changed through an association under rspec/factory_girl? An example is in this gist<https://gist.github.com/2484336> . All tests pass except the last. All the steps pass in the console. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To view this discussion on the web

Hello, Quick question on caching based on time based expiration. Is this something that rails supports? Is there a way to instruct rails to refetch the new page after a time period or do we actually have to spawn a background process and have it expire the pages. Thanks, Sam. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I noticed that there were quite a few files with version ids of '$FreeBSD$' when I ran mergemaster after an install of 4.8R. This isn't right is it? What are the consequences of installing over your files with unexpanded version ids? I would like to build a release(make release) and want to know if I can continue or if this is going to be a problem for future

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Gary Benson wrote: > When you genetate code on PowerPC you need to explicitly invalidate > the instruction cache to force the processor to reread it. In LLVM > there is code to do this for function stubs on Macintosh, but not > for other platforms and not for JITted code generally. Applied, thanks!

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Gary Benson wrote: > > When you genetate code on PowerPC you need to explicitly > > invalidate the instruction cache to force the processor to reread > > it. In LLVM there is code to do this for function stubs on > > Macintosh, but not for other platforms and not for JITted code > > generally. > > Applied, thanks!

Hi all, I cannot find a clean way to create/edit an object that ''belongs_to'' another one, just by using form fields. I always need to explicitely unassemble it, store the master id in a hidden field, and then refetch the master from its id, and put it back in the object. To summarize: I want to create a new member, for a given project @project= ... @member =

...de/asm-generic/rwonce.h b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..92cc2f223cb3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h > @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* > + * Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching reads or writes. The > + * compiler is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of > + * READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE, but only when the compiler is aware of some > + * particular ordering. One way to make the compiler aware of ordering is to > + * put the two invocations of READ...

I have noticed that the image_tag helper method now appends a request parameter to the generated src attribute. With Rails 1.0/actionpack-1.11.2 I had <img src="/images/rss.gif" /> Now (1.1/1.12.1) I get <img alt="Rss" border="0" src="/images/rss.gif?1142366545" /> Is there any use for that number? Where does it come from? This is very far

I lost my "connection lost" error.. but now I''ve got a "Mysql::Error: MySQL server has gone away" error.. It comes from: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.15.6/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:128:in ''log''. I''m not sure if Rails / BackgroundRb uses it .. but i''ve got the mysql (2.7) gem

...atory-y += shmparam.h diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..92cc2f223cb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching reads or writes. The + * compiler is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of + * READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE, but only when the compiler is aware of some + * particular ordering. One way to make the compiler aware of ordering is to + * put the two invocations of READ_ONCE or WRITE_ONCE...

...ile ("nop") diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..92cc2f223cb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching reads or writes. The + * compiler is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of + * READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE, but only when the compiler is aware of some + * particular ordering. One way to make the compiler aware of ordering is to + * put the two invocations of READ_ONCE or WRITE_ONCE...

...andatory-y += simd.h diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d189455ae038 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwonce.h @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Prevent the compiler from merging or refetching reads or writes. The + * compiler is also forbidden from reordering successive instances of + * READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE, but only when the compiler is aware of some + * particular ordering. One way to make the compiler aware of ordering is to + * put the two invocations of READ_ONCE or WRITE_ONCE...

Hi Timo and other dovecot fans, why, when I'm trying to read certain "Drafts" emails that I just created, or edited, do the dovecot children die (or so I think). In mutt, the behaviour is that I "c =Drafts" then select the email and I get "connection closed to squeaky.rubberduck.com". In Mail.app - she just loops, trying to read those headers again and again

Hi all, When you genetate code on PowerPC you need to explicitly invalidate the instruction cache to force the processor to reread it. In LLVM there is code to do this for function stubs on Macintosh, but not for other platforms and not for JITted code generally. The attached patch adds support for GNU platforms, but I can't figure out a nice way to call it for all generated code. Can

find_by_sql BREAKS THE OOP BEAUTY and perhaps we can solve that. NAMING CONVENTIONS can perhaps make find_by_sql much more clever. lets imagine that relation: publishers <- books <-> authors_books <-> authors -> universities (can''t find something else than university for that last association :) ) imagine we want to fetch every book and every associated

This feels more like a question to ask the core list, forgive me if I trespass. I''ve been trying to help one of my cow orkers get through a sticky problem. He''s got a fairly complex nested form to update a model and its children. He''s started adding some validations, and we''ve encountered a number of issues: First he had a validation on one of the child

Hi all, I''ve been looking into having Puppet deploy some larger files and I''m noticing that it ties up puppetmasters quite a bit and can often result in a timeout if the file is too large. Before I submit a feature request for a http method for file sources, I would throw it out to the group and see if anyone had any thoughts on it. Possible benefits of a HTTP source could be