search for: reeuwijk

On 09/02/2010 07:51 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > > On Sep 2, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Kees van Reeuwijk wrote: > >> - snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s//%s", dir, bin); > > There's no comment, and no mention in the commit message. > It seems pretty safe to fix. > >> Also, the if-all-else-fails return value of GetMainExecutable is an empty path, but since the users...

...ive an explicit error in such cases, or at the very least to return a path just containing Arg0 rather than the empty string? It would be nice if these fixes could be part of llvm 2.8, since we're planning to use that as our base version for Minix, once it's released. -- Dr. ir. Kees van Reeuwijk, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: minix-patch.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1005 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100902/9902780e/attachment.obj&gt...

...ons that llvm supports, in particular for returning small structs. I'm also looking for a way to let llvm always use the stack for such small structures, since that's the calling convention on the platform I'm porting to (Minix 3). Thanks for any help with this. -- Dr. Ir. Kees van Reeuwijk, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

On Sep 2, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Kees van Reeuwijk wrote: > - snprintf(buf, PATH_MAX, "%s//%s", dir, bin); There's no comment, and no mention in the commit message. It seems pretty safe to fix. > Also, the if-all-else-fails return value of GetMainExecutable is an empty path, but since the users of this function don't tes...

Hi Kees, You added some support for Minix to LLVM's copy of googletest: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=100895 Is it still being used? If so, would you mind pushing these patches upstream to the googletest project: http://code.google.com/p/googletest/ Otherwise we may drop them, because it makes it harder to import new releases of googletest into the LLVM

On 27 July 2011 11:20, dr. ir. Kees van Reeuwijk <reeuwijk at few.vu.nl> wrote: > At the time I submitted  those patches I also submitted them to googletest. As far as I know they got accepted, although I didn't verify that. OK, I see from this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework/browse_thread/thread/3081a149...

...t plug/add functionality supported by libvirt in the first place? Is there some kind of overview document about this? What is the most authoritative documentation of this functionality? Is there a Java or C API to access this functionality? Thank you for any help you can give me, -- Kees van Reeuwijk

Hello Jay, At the time I submitted those patches I also submitted them to googletest. As far as I know they got accepted, although I didn't verify that. I am no longer working on the Minix project, but since the Minix project is most definitely using llvm, I am cc:-ing this to the Minix developers mailing list. Perhaps they want to respond to this. -- Kees On 27 Jul 2011, at 11:43, Jay