search for: reentri

This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached

This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached

Greetings, all: OS: CentOS 6.4 x86_64 Kernel: 2.6.32-358.14.1 I could use some assistance with setting up pulse to load balance my dns servers. I've configured tcp and udp port 53 with the piranha gui, set up arptable rules on the real servers and added the virtual ip to the bond0 interface on the real servers, but I'm still having no luck in getting things going. A dig against the

Hi There, I am currently exploring C++ JIT-compilation for a project where this would be very useful. I started with the code from the lli tool which uses OrcLazyJIT and changed it, such that the module is being compiled from c++ source in memory and OrcLazyJIT is used exclusively. Now since I am on windows, I found that my application is crashing when trying to run the main function from the

Hi All, I'm back again after a couple of weeks hiatus, and I have some good news for anyone interested in cross-process JITing with OrcV2: The remote TargetProcessControl and Orc library breakup patch has landed in 1d0676b54c4 [1]. Thanks very much to Dave Blaikie and Stefan Graenitz for all their feedback on the review! As described in my last email, this commit breaks the OrcJIT library

/**************************************************************************** * * * Always Be Conferencing (ABC) * * * * Creator: chris @ Penguin PBX Solutions * *

Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> > 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >> > specifically for net and block (note the new names). So why not a transport feature? Is it just because the SCSI commands for virtio-blk also require a config space field? Sorry if I missed this upthread. Paolo >> > 3) I note the

Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> > 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >> > specifically for net and block (note the new names). So why not a transport feature? Is it just because the SCSI commands for virtio-blk also require a config space field? Sorry if I missed this upthread. Paolo >> > 3) I note the

Hi David, This is really cool. I'd love to get this in-tree. There are two ways we could go about this: (1) Make the OrcArchitecture interface ABI-aware so that it can choose the right resolver code, or (2) Replace the OrcArchitecture classes with OrcABI classes. I.e. We'd just a rename OrcX86_64 -> Orc_X86_64_SysV (and rename I386 & AArch64 similarly) , then we add your code as

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: > Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>> > 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >>> > specifically for net and block (note the new names). > > So why not a transport feature? Is it just because the SCSI commands > for virtio-blk also require a config space

I recently got a new SSD (ocz vertex LE 50gb) It seems to work really well as a ZIL performance wise. My question is, how safe is it? I know it doesn''t have a supercap so lets'' say dataloss occurs....is it just dataloss or is it pool loss? also, does the fact that i have a UPS matter? the numbers i''m seeing are really nice....these are some nfs tar times before

Il 20/06/2013 04:40, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: >> Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>>> 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >>>>> specifically for net and block (note the new names). >> >> So why not a transport feature? Is it just

Il 20/06/2013 04:40, Rusty Russell ha scritto: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes: >> Il 19/06/2013 10:24, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >>>>> 2) We introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_ANY_LAYOUT and VIRTIO_BLK_F_ANY_LAYOUT >>>>> specifically for net and block (note the new names). >> >> So why not a transport feature? Is it just

This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached

This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached

Rusty, ok, I think I've addressed your comments so far here. Coming next: - TSO - tap support Thanks! --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick,

This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached

This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached

Rusty, ok, I think I've addressed your comments so far here. Coming next: - TSO - tap support Thanks! --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick,

Rusty, ok, I think I've addressed your comments so far here. In particular I have added write logging for live migration, indirect buffers and virtio net header (enables gso). I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce