search for: reeducation

...y. However, I am then confused as to why it gets bound to the final element of the lapply. The environments of the returned functions are indeed different in both cases and each environment has a local binding for 'i' it just happens to be 3 -- which I will say is wrong, but I await reeducation. I looked for documentation concerning this, but I wasn't able to find anything -- I imagine that this must be documented somewhere as it appears like a reasonable thing to do. Thank you as always for any insight. -- jim ## doesn't do what I think it should x <- lapply(1:3, func...

Hi, As I''ve discussed before whenever we add USDT probes to a C++ function and call dtrace -l we get the mangled C++ name for the dtrace function, being listed :( Now the point of USDT probes is to abstract a higher level semantic construct for users to make use of. Surely it is not meant to be listing Unstable Interfaces (implementation details), such as the containing C++

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote: > > This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of > copying mails (that are not his own it seems) that trip him off right to > this list. That is bad practice. I do not want to get more of this. > > Kai Kai, as you may not already know, Will Rogers said

I have a quad core server in which I want to run 4 virtual servers. On this server I have a 1/2 terabyte raid 1 I have split between the 4 members that have the OS on it. I have raid 5 10 terabyte internal storage running on a 3ware 9690a card. I want to share this storage between the servers without partitioning it. Is this possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment