search for: reeduc

...y. However, I am then confused as to why it gets bound to the final element of the lapply. The environments of the returned functions are indeed different in both cases and each environment has a local binding for 'i' it just happens to be 3 -- which I will say is wrong, but I await reeducation. I looked for documentation concerning this, but I wasn't able to find anything -- I imagine that this must be documented somewhere as it appears like a reasonable thing to do. Thank you as always for any insight. -- jim ## doesn't do what I think it should x <- lapply(1:3,...

...es of Module and Function. 2. Or you could argue that dtrace -l is the verbose listing so it continues to list the Provider, Module, Function and Name, but running dtrace on it''s own without any params lists the probes Stable interfaces for you. You''d need to change the doc and reeducate folks, but that''s certainly possible. $dtrace "moz:::" ID PROVIDER NAME 128 mozilla3516 load-uri-start 3. Allow the author of the probe to specify Stable interfaces for Module and Function in the USDT provider dtrace.d file. provider mozilla { probe res...

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote: > > This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of > copying mails (that are not his own it seems) that trip him off right to > this list. That is bad practice. I do not want to get more of this. > > Kai Kai, as you may not already know, Will Rogers said

I have a quad core server in which I want to run 4 virtual servers. On this server I have a 1/2 terabyte raid 1 I have split between the 4 members that have the OS on it. I have raid 5 10 terabyte internal storage running on a 3ware 9690a card. I want to share this storage between the servers without partitioning it. Is this possible? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment