search for: reduplicate

From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index

...user will connect > to. I have been there, done that and my workgroup was scattered over three > counties! It isn't easy. > > Rowland > > Geez! It's too deep for me to understand. I did achieve what I want with old samba version only doing some simple settings, I tried to reduplicate the result using new samba version but it failed. I didn't expect it comes to this way you mentioned, it seems more complicated. We do have an AD for PC windows workgroup. Why should I need to create a new AD? Would you please give me an example or show me how to setup samba as you said? I ha...

...have been there, done that > and my workgroup was scattered over three counties! It isn't easy. > > Rowland > > > Geez! It's too deep for me to understand. > I did achieve what I want with old samba version only doing some > simple settings, > I tried to reduplicate the result using new samba version but it failed. > I didn't expect it comes to this way you mentioned, it seems more > complicated. No, I doubt if you will be unable to understand it, you just haven't had any experience yet. > > We do have an AD for PC windows workgroup. Wh...

Friends I can't quite find a direct answer to this question from the lists, so here goes: I have several dataframes, 200+ columns 2000+ rows. I wish to script some operations to perform on some of the variables (columns) in the data frames not knowing what the column number is, hence have to refer by name. I have variable names in a text file "varlist". So, something like this:

...g passed as a pointer to init.trampoline and adjust.trampoline. For example like it is in the testcase for this feature. However, using -instcombine, -gvn, -instcombine > + // (hence with -O2 and above) usually works, even with multiple bitcasts. It > + // probably is not worthwhile to-reduplicate the work here in the unlikely > + // case of the code being compiled with only the InstCombine pass enabled. I don't think this comment (including the bit before) should exist. Passes rely on other passes have put things in decent shape all the time, and don't bother to say so. >...

2015-11-04 21:42 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 04/11/15 12:58, Roger Wu wrote: > >> >> >> 2015-11-04 19:43 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com >> <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>>: >> >> On 04/11/15 11:33, Roger Wu wrote: >> >> >> >>

Hi! Attached patches split init.trampoline into adjust.trampoline and init.trampoline, like in gcc. As mentioned in the previous mail, I've not made a documentation patch, since I'm not sure about what the documented semantics of llvm.adjust.trampoline should be. Thanks! -- Sanjoy Das http://playingwithpointers.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

The following series implement a way to generate the help messages and the btrfs man page from the sources comments for the "btrfs" commanda . The syntax and the detailed help of every subcommand are stored in the comments before the function which implements the subcommand. The fact that the help messages and the man page are generated from the same source should help to avoid

...I use NIS as centralization of user authentication? I can do it at samba3x, or samba4x do it in a total different way? > >> Geez! It's too deep for me to understand. >> I did achieve what I want with old samba version only doing some simple >> settings, >> I tried to reduplicate the result using new samba version but it failed. >> I didn't expect it comes to this way you mentioned, it seems more >> complicated. >> > > No, I doubt if you will be unable to understand it, you just haven't had > any experience yet. > > >> We do ha...