search for: redispatching

I''ve been having a mess of a time using this module, which stinks because its behavior is EXACTLY what I am looking for... whenever I bootstrap new rabbitMQ nodes I want to add them to our HAProxy instance. Here''s my relevant site.pp entries: node /^rabbit.*/ inherits basenode { @@haproxy::balancermember { $fqdn: listening_service => ''messaging00'',

hello list, I am attempting to load balance SSL web servers using haproxy on centos 5.7. I am using HA-Proxy version 1.4.18 Here is the stanza in the config regarding SSL: listen https 192.168.1.200:443 mode tcp balance roundrobin option forwardfor except 192.168.1.200 option redispatch maxconn 10000 reqadd X-Forwarded-Proto:\ https

Hello, I hope my question is not off-topic here. On CentOS 7.2.1511 I have installed: haproxy-1.5.14-3.el7.x86_64 httpd-2.4.6-40.el7.centos.1.x86_64 The /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg binds HAProxy to ports 80 and 443 and accepts HTTPS to slova.de: defaults mode http option http-server-close option forwardfor except 127.0.0.0/8 option

...invoke? > Syntax: > > dispatch resume to label<resumedest> How do you say: if nothing is matched, keep unwinding out of the function? Actually I don't see why <resumedest> is useful at all, since you can always place a complete set of all handlers into one dispatch, so redispatching is not needed. That said, it might be handy for reducing code duplication. > catches [ > <type> <val>, label<dest1> > ... > ] > catchall [<type> <val>, label<dest> ] > personality [<type> <value&g...

Hello, all: I have a problem want to discus with you, Chris someone should be the right person. In llvm-3.1.src/lib/support/unix/Signals.inc, in SignalHandler, we have: static RETSIGTYPE SignalHandler(int Sig) { ... SignalsMutex.acquire(); RemoveFilesToRemove(); ... } We can also find following code snippet in the same file: void llvm::sys::RunInterruptHandlers() {

I''m happy to announce that ChaCha.com a new search engine that debuted this week and it runs on a mongrel cluster. Warning, promo follows. :) ChaCha.com is unlike any other search engine since it allows you to connect to a "guide" with experience in the field(s) of knowledge you are searching in. (Based on your keywords) Check it out at http://www.chacha.com Now on to my

...t; >> dispatch resume to label<resumedest> > > How do you say: if nothing is matched, keep unwinding out of the function? > Actually I don't see why <resumedest> is useful at all, since you can always > place a complete set of all handlers into one dispatch, so redispatching is > not needed. That said, it might be handy for reducing code duplication. > The <resumedest> will have code to handling unwinding out of the function. Normally, it will just call _Unwind_Resume(). As you saw in the example, though, it may call other things (like `terminate()')....

This is a revision of the second exception handling proposal I sent out. You can see it here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036484.html After much discussion, there are some changes to the proposal – some significant and some minor. One major point, this proposal does not address the issue of catching an exception thrown from a non-invoke instruction. However if done

Hello all. I too found out that I sometimes have some action that can take up to 10 seconds in my rails application. I''ve read all arguments Zed made about polling/and inbox strategies, and I think I just can''t work around my feeling that a "wrong" request that takes up too much time should be able to lock subsequent requests in mongrels queue. That''s what

Hello, I''m running Puppet 2.7.6 and currently expanding the number of servers managed by Puppet. At around the 160-170 host mark (with a 5-minute run interval + splay), my puppetmaster server is starting to die. Is this normal? What I''m getting in the agent logs is the following: Wed Jun 20 12:15:08 +0200 2012 Puppet (debug): Failed to load library