Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "redising".
Did you mean:
redisign
2020 Jul 02
3
(no subject)
...nte samba 4 AD and notice that the ldap schema are
very different that we have, so many changes, that implies to many
development on the interface.
Know I thinking that is posible to make another ldap schema just for samba
4 AD and continue using the other for rest of products, but this implies to
redising the interface to update users, groups on both schemas.
Another question: Thinking on samba 4 AD, when a user logon on desktop
client, it can map o access direct to resources shared on samba server or
need to authenticate almost at once ? Because actually on windows clients
this is not needed, when...
2023 Jul 14
0
FYI: información de agosto
banner
Descubra como redise?ar la pol?tica de seguridad, las nuevas herramientas y las actualizaciones de las normas oficiales mexicanas NOMs para detectar y controlar los riesgos, prevenir accidentes y enfermedades en el trabajo; funciones esenciales del responsable de la seguridad e higiene de la organizaci?n.
Al participar en este evento usted recibir?
? 16 horas de informaci?n estrat?gica
2020 Jul 02
0
(no subject)
...development on the interface.
Yes AD uses its own schema and must be extended differently from
openldap etc, but it can be extended.
> Know I thinking that is posible to make another ldap schema just for samba
> 4 AD and continue using the other for rest of products, but this implies to
> redising the interface to update users, groups on both schemas.
That is the problem with trying to maintain two ldap versions
> Another question: Thinking on samba 4 AD, when a user logon on desktop
> client, it can map o access direct to resources shared on samba server or
> need to authenticate a...
2020 Jul 02
0
help whith linux client on domain
...nte samba 4 AD and notice that the ldap schema are
very different that we have, so many changes, that implies to many
development on the interface.
Know I thinking that is posible to make another ldap schema just for samba
4 AD and continue using the other for rest of products, but this implies to
redising the interface to update users, groups on both schemas.
Another question: Thinking on samba 4 AD, when a user logon on desktop
client, it can map o access direct to resources shared on samba server or
need to authenticate almost at once ? Because actually on windows clients
this is not needed, when...
2020 Jul 02
2
(no subject)
Hello we use a samba with a old ldap (zentyal-ebox), for now it is
impossible to update to new samba version because we use the ldap schema
repository for others purposes, son we can move to another version that
support samba 4 AD, for the moment we just keep this version.
It is possible to join and validate user with linux desktop, we actually
use a lot of clients with windows xp/7 and work
2020 Jul 02
2
(no subject)
...Yes AD uses its own schema and must be extended differently from
> openldap etc, but it can be extended.
> > Know I thinking that is posible to make another ldap schema just for
> samba
> > 4 AD and continue using the other for rest of products, but this implies
> to
> > redising the interface to update users, groups on both schemas.
> That is the problem with trying to maintain two ldap versions
> > Another question: Thinking on samba 4 AD, when a user logon on desktop
> > client, it can map o access direct to resources shared on samba server or
> > ne...