search for: rediscuss

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "rediscuss".

Did you mean: discuss
2015 Mar 20
0
Roadmap to 2.7.3
On Mar 19, 2015, at 2:00 PM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote: > So is everything good to go from your PoV Charles? Yes, except if we aren't going to fix the NSS SSL issue for this release, we should do two things before releasing: ? Add a note to UPGRADING explaining the problem and the -D workaround ? Branch and plan to release 2.7.3.1 (or similar) once we fix
2017 Aug 31
2
Re: network configuration for guest specific dns-servers
...request this in > our bugzilla [1] so that we can track it. Or, even better, send a patch > if you have some time ;) It should not be difficult. Okay, I'll be sure to add it to bugzilla sometime soon. Your request for a patch implies that this would be a welcome feature and will not be rediscussed on its principal merit correct? (implementation details notwithstanding ;-) ) The reason I ask, is that I do not have a development environment ready for libvirt and there will be quite a bit work before I've read through all your guidelines, setup a development VM (I suppose that should be...
2017 Aug 30
2
network configuration for guest specific dns-servers
Hello, similar to how one can configure guest specific IP addresses via mac addresses: <ip address="192.168.122.1" netmask="255.255.255.0" localPtr="yes"> <dhcp> <range start="192.168.122.100" end="192.168.122.254"/> <host mac="00:16:3e:77:e2:ed" name="foo.example.com"
2015 Mar 19
4
Roadmap to 2.7.3
Hi Charles and the list, a complementary update... 2015-03-16 13:46 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:04 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > > > We only have a few open items that I think should be resolved before > releasing 2.7.3. The list grew a bit in the past week, but we'll cover that > later. Here is the list: > > > >
2006 Mar 22
4
pbinom( ) function (PR#8700)
Full_Name: Chanseok Park Version: R 2.2.1 OS: RedHat EL4 Submission from: (NULL) (130.127.112.89) pbinom(any negative value, size, prob) should be zero. But I got the following results. I mean, if a negative value is close to zero, then pbinom() calculate pbinom(0, size, prob). dbinom() also behaves similarly. > pbinom( -2.220446e-22, 3,.1) [1] 0.729 > pbinom( -2.220446e-8, 3,.1)