search for: recursor

Every post I do to this mailinglist is followed by a bounce message from "centos.5.warren at recursor.net". I have no clue why this is being send to me, afaics some IP address is being blacklisted but I am not related to it. Am I the only one who gets this and can we remove this person from the mailinglist ? Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [...

...k on any of my centos boxes. Running Centos 5 and 6. Any thoughts on why these will not run? The services start fine but when telling to perform a dig using itself as the resolver the queries fail (See below). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ed [root at qmail ~]# ps -aux | grep pdns-recursor Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ root 7908 0.0 0.1 61208 568 pts/2 R+ 11:07 0:00 grep pdns-recursor [root at qmail ~]# [root at qmail ~]# [root at qmail ~]# [root at qmail ~]# [root at qmail ~]# dig mx blm.gov @127.0.0.1 ; &lt...

Hello, while investigating a report from Jan-Piet Mens (resulting in http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/changeset/3109), we discovered that NSD (both 3.2.15 and 4.0.0b4) compresses labels in RP content. As far as I can see, this is not allowed by RFC3597 section 4 paragraph 1/2. PowerDNS Recursor, like Unbound and BIND, now deals with this as 3597 section 4 paragraph 4 says we SHOULD. Nevertheless, it would be great if NSD could honor the MUST NOT in paragraph 2. Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk Netherlabs Computer Consulting BV - http://www.netherlabs.nl/

...es not harmonize! Warren - whoever you are - please subscribe with a mail address which accepts delivery without such nasty bounces! (Got the bounce instantly to my last reply to "Error when starting apache".) Alexander -----Weitergeleitete Nachricht----- > From: centos.5.warren at recursor.net > To: ad+lists at uni-x.org > Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details > Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:21:34 -0700 > > The original message was received at Thu, 8 Sep 2005 15:21:33 -0700 > from localhost [127.0.0.1] > > ----- The following addresses had perman...

...ur servers (a) too often (b) during office / peak hours You could load balance multiple servers (using lots of available load-balancing technologies) to allow you to perform maintenance at certain times, but it has its own issues. I've recently been looking at PowerDNS, which separates the recursor and the authoritative server into two distinct packages. I'm just running the authoritative server as a master, and keeping my old bind/named servers as recursors / slaves. It's a home office network, but I only have issues when I'm tinkering, and if I were to be doing this kind of...

Hi, how can DNS reliability, as experienced by clients on the LAN who are sending queries, be increased? Would I have to set up some sort of cluster consisting of several servers all providing DNS services which is reachable under a single IP address known to the clients? Just setting up several name servers and making them known to the clients for the clients to automatically switch isn't

I'm about to do an overhaul of the DNS service at work and my plan is to use powerdns recursor + dnsdist + keepalived. --- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! On 2019-07-25 14:28, Leroy Tennison wrote: > If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a > master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set > up (I'm assumi...

...servers (using lots of available load-balancing technologies) to allow you to perform maintenance at certain times, but it has its own issues. Load balancing or clustering? At least clustering seems not entirely trivial to do. > I've recently been looking at PowerDNS, which separates the recursor and the authoritative server into two distinct packages. I'm just running the authoritative server as a master, and keeping my old bind/named servers as recursors / slaves. This can be done with bind, how does it require something called PowerDNS? > It's a home > office network, but...

Thanks to help in a previous thread, I now have a working LLVM codegen for the MLton compiler. Currently the stack is managed explicitly on the heap. This way the LLVM codegen re-uses the runtime layout of the other codegens, simplifying the initial porting effort. In the next phase I plan to switch to using LLVM to manage the stack, but there is a sticking point: MLton switches stacks. It does

...nt) rdtype, answer, sizeof(answer)); [...] In the glibc stub-resolver, "sizeof(answer)" is eventually passed on as "anslen" to __res_nopt() in resolv/res_mkquery.c: [...] NS_PUT16(anslen & 0xffff, cp); /* CLASS = UDP payload size */ and sent out to the recursor: | IP 127.0.0.1.44138 > 127.0.0.1.53: 31454+ [1au] SSHFP? orbit.attraktor.org. ar: . OPT UDPsize=0 (48) | IP 127.0.0.1.53 > 127.0.0.1.44138: 31454 ServFail-| [0q] 0/0/0 (12) Hauke. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: getrrsetbyname-anslen.pa...

...00-999,999 for rid and 1,000,000 to 9,999,999 for autorid. > check again if host.fqdn a and ptr exists in the dns. # dig +short wrn-radtest.ad.example.net. a 192.168.5.83 # dig +short -x 192.168.5.83 wrn-radtest.ad.example.net. > check resolv.conf Points to two nearby instances of pdns recursor, which in turn forward domains "ad.example.net" and "5.168.192.in-addr.arpa" to the Samba servers. > make sure your primary domain is listed first. It only has "ad.example.net" in the search section. > you left and rejoined the domain, so you can try regene...

Can someone point me to instructions on how to build a pxeboot/initrd.img with updated drivers. I would like to pxe boot and install rh8 on a newer machine, and the pxeboot files that come with rh8 (2.4.20-8) don't support my e1000 NIC. I believe that the newer 2.4.20-28.8 drivers will, but I'm having trouble finding instructions in rebuilding the pxeboot initrd.img + vmlinuz to

Hi, I have a new xen hosting platform. I have given the bridge a static IP which I can ping/ssh to etc, when I create a new vm all works well apart from the networking. If I give DomU a static IP I can''t ping out from the box, Dom0 can''t ping the vm. I''m suspecting it just isn''t seeing the bridge but am unsure where to start looking. This is a very standard

I would like to use dnsmasq to cache nameserver query results, and I have set dhcp to prepend the 127.0.0.1 name-server to the list of nameservers. dnsmasq would then automatically exclude the localhost as a name server and use all the others from the list provided by dhcp. But it was too nice to be true, because NetworkManager was there, ready to mess up anything I try to do, including the

I am trying to use a keytab for a client machine to authenticate to Samba's own LDAP server. The samba servers (replicated) are ubuntu 16.04 with samba 4.5.2 compiled from source. The client machine is ubuntu 16.04 with stock samba 4.3.11. It has been joined directly to the Samba domain ("net ads join"). I have also extracted a keytab ("net ads keytab create -P")

Hi guys, is that a genuine email from the list, I'm getting it rejected as it's missing reverse hostname: May 2 21:21:41 postfix/smtpd[18033]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[194.89.34.45]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [194.89.34.45]; from=<dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> to=<voytek at sbt.net.au> proto=ESMTP

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.35 Severity: minor Manual page reads: SYNOPSIS logcheck [TIONS] Perhaps it was intended to read: SYNOPSIS logcheck [OPTIONS] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.39 Severity: wishlist These are the subject of an am-utils FAQ <URL:http://www.am-utils.org/docs/am-utils/FAQ.txt> and would be useful in the ignored list. Note that it's either `newer' or `older'. Jun 14 14:32:25 albion kernel: nfs warning: mount version newer than kernel Jun 14 14:37:54 dlsy kernel: nfs warning: mount version older

...return values > ## > Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > severity 500572 normal Bug #500572 [pdns-server] inconsistent AAAA return values Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > ## > > severity 500780 serious > ## > Bug #500780 [pdns-recursor] cannot forward zone queries to IPv6 addresses > ## > Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > severity 500780 normal Bug #500780 [pdns-recursor] cannot forward zone queries to IPv6 addresses Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > ## > > severi...

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.40 Severity: normal Tags: patch There are one line that is not properly ignored. I include in the report a better version. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: