search for: recursivly

...+1036,16 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SAFE_STACK(exc_vmm_communication) > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > + > + /* > + * #DB is special and needs to be handled outside of the intrumentation_begin()/end(). > + * Otherwise the #VC handler could be raised recursivly. > + */ > + if (error_code == SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + X86_TRAP_DB) { > + vc_handle_trap_db(regs); > + return; > + } > + > instrumentation_begin(); Wait what?! That makes no sense what so ever.

...+1036,16 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC_SAFE_STACK(exc_vmm_communication) > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > + > + /* > + * #DB is special and needs to be handled outside of the intrumentation_begin()/end(). > + * Otherwise the #VC handler could be raised recursivly. > + */ > + if (error_code == SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + X86_TRAP_DB) { > + vc_handle_trap_db(regs); > + return; > + } > + > instrumentation_begin(); Wait what?! That makes no sense what so ever.

Hi, Following problem: We have a tree structure with children and a root element (recursivly) stored in one table (imagine a threaded forum). Each of the children has a title which should be indexed by ferret. Now we want to make a search that returns only the root and searches all items. So if one node has "expensive" and nother node has "car" I want to enter &quot...

...a error message that it could not write 4096 bytes, receives a SIGPIPE and errno is set to EPIPE in the fwrite call (line 279 in log.c). Then exit_cleanup is called which in turn will call the same routine again and will of course get EPIPE again and the loop continues (as long as we have memory to recursivly call the same functions again and again). As a quick workaround we have the following patch, since there is no real point in trying to issue an error message if you have already received EPIPE on write. --- log.c +++ log.c 2002/10/08 11:55:52 @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ if (!f) exit_cleanup(RERR_MESSA...

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Handle #VC exceptions caused by #DB exceptions in the guest. Those must be handled outside of instrumentation_begin()/end() so that the handler will not be raised recursivly. Handle them by calling the kernels debug exception handler. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c index 8f275e5d1ce7..b0f08d9...

Hi all, We are running a samba (3.0.14a-3 / sarge) server with windows 2000 Client. (recent remplacement of a NT server) The problem his that when I try to recursivly remove a folder on a samba share with "rd /s" on the windows shell, the command return an error and stop deletting subfile when the number of subfile exceed (exactly) 130. At the end of the command only 130 are deleted and not the full directory. That's very important for me because...

...provides. I went up to doing fancy stuff like rsync -av -e ssh --include '*/' --exclude '*' --include-from=file / thomas@10.10.164.170:/ (file containing \n seperated /etc/bash.bashrc /etc/profile /home/thomas/testfile) ..yet no success. rsync ends up either stating all files recursivly so i ^C or it just tries to dump them all into / (where I don't have write access). So all I want is rsyncing files while preserving their _absolute_ paths on the target machine which doesn't seem possible. Can someone point me to a patch or so? If not consider this as a feature reques...

..._STACK(exc_vmm_communication) > > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > > > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > > + > > + /* > > + * #DB is special and needs to be handled outside of the intrumentation_begin()/end(). > > + * Otherwise the #VC handler could be raised recursivly. > > + */ > > + if (error_code == SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + X86_TRAP_DB) { > > + vc_handle_trap_db(regs); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > instrumentation_begin(); > > Wait what?! That makes no sense what so ever. Then my understanding of intrumentat...

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Handle #VC exceptions caused by #DB exceptions in the guest. Those must be handled outside of instrumentation_begin()/end() so that the handler will not be raised recursivly. Handle them by calling the kernels debug exception handler. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200724160336.5435-64-joro at 8bytes.org --- arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x...

Hi all, [Please CC me in replies, I am not subscribed to this list.] First of all, thanks for puppet! It is a very nice tool and I''m in the (slow) process of using it to manage my new Xen-based virtual server farm with it. Most of the "simple" tasks worked well so far, and I may be able to add a few recipies to the Wiki when I find time to do so. However, is there any way

On 25/10/2020 20:37, Sonic wrote: > The reset allowed the current GPO to take effect, but right after > adding a new GPO (just named it, no editing, or linking) the > sysvolcheck fails: > # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception > - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory >

...> > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > > > > > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * #DB is special and needs to be handled outside of the intrumentation_begin()/end(). > > > + * Otherwise the #VC handler could be raised recursivly. > > > + */ > > > + if (error_code == SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + X86_TRAP_DB) { > > > + vc_handle_trap_db(regs); > > > + return; > > > + } > > > + > > > instrumentation_begin(); > > > > Wait what?! That makes no sense what s...

...> > struct ghcb *ghcb; > > > > > > lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled(); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * #DB is special and needs to be handled outside of the intrumentation_begin()/end(). > > > + * Otherwise the #VC handler could be raised recursivly. > > > + */ > > > + if (error_code == SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + X86_TRAP_DB) { > > > + vc_handle_trap_db(regs); > > > + return; > > > + } > > > + > > > instrumentation_begin(); > > > > Wait what?! That makes no sense what s...

Hi folks, I have a bunch of directories to mirror via rsync. I have lots of hardlinked files spread about these directories. Therfore I use -R (--relative) and -H. so far ok but: I create symlinks to the source-directories via script because src-dirs have changing names (date and time of backup) and I want to have constant directory names on target. How can I achieve that? I thought -k

On 3/17/2012 4:14 PM, Anders Waldenborg wrote: > FYI: > > I've also been working on new python bindings. > > My bindings are written using ctypes (just like the in-tree > clang/cindex bindings). Most of Core.h is bound, and stuff from > ExecutionEngine.h, Analysis, BitReader, BitWriter. The have fairly > good test coverage (using nosetests). The ctypes definitions are

...SHARE_USERS}/${FindUser}/" # Set basic POSIX Rights # set all owner rights to root:root (= Administrator:Domain Admins ) # without it, migrated files might still have there old UID/GIDs on them. echo "Re-apply root:root on the user homedir (recursivly) for: ${FindUser}" chown -R root:root "${SAMBA_SHARE_USERS}/${FindUser}" # We set the user files and subfolders like how that SDDL is setup. echo "Re-apply ${FindUser}:domain users on CONTENT IN the user homedir for: ${FindUser}"...

...ntuser.dat.LOG -rwx------ 1 renloe users 20 Feb 27 14:24 ntuser.ini [root@samba profile]# So naturally when win2k goes to write the profile, it can't write most of it cause it doesn't have permission to do so. Now, if I go in and manually chmod -R 0700 the profile directory (recursivly read-write everything) the roaming profile then works fine. But this shouldn't be the case. Is there a fix for this? is this a known issue? or am I just lucky, and this only happens to me. Any Input would be appreciated. Thanx --Robert

...getValueID() to enable more > efficient value casting. I'm doing the very same thing in my bindings, and yes it is a bit inefficient, but seems to work fine and should work fine as long as classes are not moved in the hierarchy. I use the same hierarchy at python level. And at python level recursivly drills down into the correct subclass by doing LLVMIsA* for the possible (direct) subclasses. > From some discussion on #llvm, I think people > are receptive to this. The main concern would be that the C API would be > tied to a specific version of the shared library because the value ID...

At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:12:08 +0100, Christoph Grenz wrote: > > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012, 21:15:02 schrieb Gregory Szorc: > > There was some talk on IRC last week about desire for Python bindings to > > LLVM's Object.h C interface. So, I coded up some and you can now find > > some Python bindings in trunk at bindings/python. Currently, the >

Changelog from V1 to V2: 1. Modify some codes according to Mark's advice. 2. Attach some test statistics in the commit log of patch 3 and in this e-mail also. See below. Hi all, In ocfs2, when we create a fresh file system and create inodes in it, they are contiguous and good for readdir+stat. While if we delete all the inodes and created again, the new inodes will get spread out and that