search for: recopy

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6747 Summary: rsync recopies files with diacritics in the file names. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: mmcmonster

Right now we do a lot of hard to hard disk backup by using rsync to weekly "mirror" the source filesystem to a backup filesystem. This works fairly well for most sources. However, one issue with rsync is that simple things like changing the file name or directory name cause the whole file or directory structure to get recopied over a previous sync. Also, like for mail spools, large

...), is readonly. However, certain files that should not be changing, are being re-rsync'd every time we restart our rsync's. We're restarting them, because rsync keeps dying, reporting NFS write errors. Does this mean rsync is somehow glitching (not on the NFS write errors, but on the recopying of what should be immutable files)? Or could it mean that our source or destination filesystem(s) have data integrity problems? Thanks! -- Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI <strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu>

Hi all, Ok, since 3.1 still isn't in stable, I'm curious if I can just find the equivalent of: rsync -avHP --delete --exclude-from '/home/user/excludes.txt' /mnt/example.com/ /var/vmail/example.com/ But that will ignore differences in permissions - ie, won't recopy everything, just because the permissions on the source are different from the permissions on the target... So, would this just be: rsync -rltgovDHP --delete --exclude-from '/home/user/excludes.txt' /mnt/example.com/ /var/vmail/example.com/ ? Thanks, -- Best regards, */Charles/* -...

Hello Everyone I'm looking into the best way to have locked version repos for my CentOS systems. The systems are all set up with Chef and have a couple different recopies/roles. I'd like to have locked version repos for each role with tested RPMs. Then perhaps quarterly apply any updates. It would be nice to have something showing which updates are available for these locked repos.

...Geis wrote: > Well after a closer look - Seems like the OLD 8.0 iso image is still on the > USB. Not the new 8.1 > > I have tried to redo the dd command to copy the 8.1 iso - I get no errors - > but it still comes up with the 8.0 > I then tried to remove the partitions, save and recopy. still same old boot > menu. > > Is there a trick to write over the UEFI stuff ? > > Jerry > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- J Martin Rushton MBCS

Greetings, I am having a problem with rsync deleting entire folders and files and then attempting to recopy the entire contents of the folder(s) even though they are up to date. The task is syncing from ubuntu (rsync version 3.1.1) to windows using cygwin (rsync version 3.1.2). I have a number of these configurations, and they all work except this one. I use the modify-window=600 and cannot understand...

...one that's otherwise quite useful, but has a big "copy all your data over" step I'd like to skip: http://sysadmin.compxtreme.ro/how-to-migrate-a-single-disk-linux-system-to-software-raid1/ But it would seem to me that a sequence roughly like this should work without having to recopy all the files. 1) umount /var/data; 2) parted /dev/sdX (change type to fd - Linux RAID auto) 3) Set some volume parameters so it's seen as a RAID1 partition "Degraded". (parted?) 4) ??? Insert mdadm magic here ??? 5) Profit! `mount /dev/md1 /var/data` Wondering if anybody has...

I did the dd if=CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso of=/dev/sdd to a 16G USB disk then tried to use it on an install. The installer said invalid install media. Any way to verify if the "write" to disk was good ? I got no errors on the dd. I did re-download the iso and did a diff and there was no diff. So I think my iso is OK. Jerry

> What is taking time, scanning inodes on the destination, or recopying the entire > backup because of either source read speed, target write speed or a slow interconnect > between them? It takes hours to traverse all these directories with loads of small files on the backup server. That is the limiting factor. Not even copying: just checking the timestamp...

Hello, I am using rsync to do daily backups on another filesystem. Whenever a folder has been renamed or moved on the source, rsync will delete all the recursive files on the destination filesystem, and then recopy them to the newly named/moved folder. This can take a long time. Is there a way to get rsync to simply re-link the files instead? It looked like maybe the -H option might, but I am not really sure how that works. Also, it says that using this option would tend to take longer. -- View this messag...

...ttleneck. For example, without the "-W" option, every file is read twice (once to checksum, once to copy). Are there other options that I could enable to speed up the copy? Is using -W dangerous? If I'm doing an incremental update (a file or two changed on the source, so I need to recopy the data) will -W catch as much as checksuming if the file timestamps change? Thanks in advance! --Tom

> If your goal is to reduce storage, and scanning inodes doesnt matter, > use --link-dest for targets. However, that'll keep a backup for every > time that you run it, by link-desting yesterday's copy. The goal was not to reduce storage, it was to reduce work. A full rsync takes more than the whole night, and the destination server is almost unusable for anything else when it

...rameters. My Base File: #... #... Param1= V1_1 #... Param2 = V2_1 Param3 = V3_1 #... What I would like for each created file i: #... #... Param1= V1_i #... Param2 = V2_i Param3 = V3_i #... For the moment my solution is to read each line of the config file, modify if needed the line and recopy it in the new file. But the problem is that my file is about 500 lines and I would like to create a lot of different version of Config_file from my Base file so with this method it takes a long time and i'm sure i can improve it. (For example for 85 differents files I have to wait 10min...) M...

I've spent the last few hours baffled by a test suite inconsistency. The exact same library code gives slightly different answers on the home and work machines - found in my R CMD check run. I've recopied the entire directory to make sure it's really identical code. The data set and fit in question has a pretty flat "top" to the likelihood. I put print statements in to

...sync -aE /Volumes/LaCie\ Disk\ A/ /Volumes/LaCie\ Disk\ B No files will be copied since B is already the same as A, but any files with resource forks will now have their last-modified times changed to the current time on the destination disk. Now running the same command again will cause rsync to recopy those files due to the differing last-modified times. This will cause the last-modified times to revert to what they were before. The result is that every other time you run the command, any files with resource forks will be recopied, even though they haven't changed. I noticed this because I...

...so image is still on > > the > > > USB. Not the new 8.1 > > > > > > I have tried to redo the dd command to copy the 8.1 iso - I get no > > errors - > > > but it still comes up with the 8.0 > > > I then tried to remove the partitions, save and recopy. still same old > > boot > > > menu. > > > > > > Is there a trick to write over the UEFI stuff ? > > > > > > Jerry > > > _______________________________________________ > > > CentOS mailing list > > > CentOS at centos.org...

...USB in my office... and it usually booted oretty well, without any hacks... After changed to syslinux 3.07, it stopped booting, showing a simple "BOOT ERROR" message, nothing more... Reverting to syslinux 2.09, it restarted to work... Formatting the key, syslinux-ing it with 3.07 and recopying the software, it restarted working, but boot time is about 10 time slower.... minutes to load kernel and initrd instead of seconds... Note: I'm using win32/syslinux.exe Bye! -- Paolo Salvan _______________________________ X v i s i o n Via Vigonovese 123A 35127 - Padova - Italy +39 049...

...9;m not familiar with all the pros/cons. And if I do need (or want) to put all the folders under INBOX, can I simply rename the existing folders in each user's Maildir (and also edit folder names accordingly in everyone's "subscriptions" file)? Or will Dovecot be broken unless I recopy everything from scratch (with a command-line option to imapsync to put everything in the INBOX destination namespace)? Rich Wales richw at richw.org

-------------------------------------------------- From: "Ahoussou Sylvie" <sylvie.ahoussou at antilles.inra.fr> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 9:48 AM To: "Thomas Lumley" <tlumley at u.washington.edu> Subject: Re: [R] Complex sampling survey _ Use of survey package > Thanks for your answer > > I think I made a mistake when I recopied the 5 first rows of