Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "reconsruct".
Did you mean:
reconstruct
2017 Apr 18
1
Antw: Re: 133 kbps stereo killer sample
...ore.
> So the artifact I heard was just clipping when encoding or decoding.
Hi!
Somewhere I read the recommendation that the peak level of input material
shopuld not be 0dB, but something like -3dB. The reasoning was that encoding
reconstructs the audio signal from the sampling points, and the reconsruction
could actually exceed the sampling point, which my result in an overdrive,
which will result in clipping.
I just wonder whether the encoder (or the decoder at least) can or should warn
in such situations.
Regards,
Ulrich
>
> Opus remains unbeaten for me at 133 kbps. That's totally...
2017 Apr 10
2
133 kbps stereo killer sample
Hello! I found a sample I can ABX successfully when encoded at
133.333 kbps. I was targetting 1 MB/min.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8KWShoIrA1kQzR1Z0FFRUlfcEU
floex.wav is 4:54–5:04 of a lossless copy of 'Forget-me-not' by
Floex, downloaded from http://store.floex.cz/album/zorya
floex-133.opus was created with `opusenc --bitrate 133.333333 floex.wav
floex-133.opus`,