search for: reconsidering

Dear R-users, I was wondering if someone could give me some advices on the following problem. I tried to apply moran’s test to a small dataset and couldn’t succeed, here is the error message:   mor <- moran.test(x, res2)   Avis dans moran.test(x, res2) :   Out-of-range p-value: reconsider test arguments   mor     Moran's I test under randomization data:  x  weights: res2 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team disapproves strongly of the actions taken by Novell on November 2nd. One of the fundamental differences between the proprietary software world and the free software world is that the proprietary software world divides users by forcing them to agree to coercive licensing agreements which restrict their rights to share with each other,

I just joined the list, and I see in the archives that about a month ago there was a brief discussion of SRP, but it was dismissed. I urge people to take a look at this site: http://srp.stanford.edu/srp/ It's very cool. Let's say I'm on vacation visiting a friend, and I want to log in to my account back home. I trust my friend's machine, but I don't have my home

On 09/11/15 21:35, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:55:23PM +0100, buhorojo wrote: >>>>>> So could you please stop sabotaging these efforts? >>>> We are helping, not sabotaging. >>> We? .... Is that you ... steves? >> Eh? Plural. We work as a team. It works that way. > Ah. OK. Can we please remove the 'buhorojo' >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team disapproves strongly of the actions taken by Novell on November 2nd. One of the fundamental differences between the proprietary software world and the free software world is that the proprietary software world divides users by forcing them to agree to coercive licensing agreements which restrict their rights to share with each other,

Hello, How can I save an ActiveRecord without trigger before_save, after_save, etc? Thanks for the help. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group,

...ach we're using in i915, > together with some tricks to kick any stuck waiters so that we can > reliably step in and grab locks for the reset. We tried this approach, but it didn't worked at all. I already considered trying it again because of the upcoming fence implementation, but reconsidering that when a driver is forced to change it's handling because of the fence implementation that's just another hint that there is something wrong here. Christian. > -Daniel

I would like to put Ruby code inside a string, between <%= %> tags, and have the code inside the tags executed when the string is displayed. Is this possible? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On 10/11/15 17:47, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:14:13AM +0100, buhorojo wrote: >> We don't think that is fair. We may not represent the views of the >> developers but we do feel that we are entitled to air our views >> here. We have support off-list, mainly from those who feel >> restricted in what they say here. Please do not use your power to

On Aug 5, 2013 1:33 PM, "Geert Stappers" <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > Op 2013-08-05 om 16:11 schreef Dash Four: > > Geert Stappers wrote: > > >Op 2013-08-05 om 12:29 schreef Dash Four: > > >>Well, I am preparing the image using livecd-creator to install all > > >>the packages. This never completes, however, because there is a

Your suggestion for two passes is indeed my plan if simply using 3-byte sizes is not acceptable. I don't want to duplicate all the logic in a second length-calculating function, so I would just have special logic for the three matching operators with children and use the existing function for the rest, passing a null output stream. Or I could conditionalize all the output on another function

Il 19-06-2018 22:16 Cole Robinson ha scritto: > Sorry, I misunderstood. You can still achieve what you want but it's > more clicks: new vm, manage storage, add volume, and select raw volume > with whatever capacity you want but with 0 allocation. Sure, but the automatic disk creation is very handy and much less error prone. As it is now, if using a fallocate-less filesystem (eg:

On 11/03/2017 06:09 AM, hw wrote: > Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> This week I've tested out a few ways to do a P2V on a rather ancient CentOS >> 6 server, in order to move it to a Hyper-V host. >> >> So far my tests have failed rather spectacularly. >> Initially I was set on doing a simple dd-routine, but was told that the >> server

Otherwise, a user can do things like "nbdkit iso . prog='date;prog'" to run unintended commands in addition to their alternative isoprog. This is not a CVE (since nbdkit isn't running with any more privileges than the user running those commands themselves), but shows the frailty of relying on the shell to parse subsidiary commands rather than exec()ing them directly. This

> > For the record, I just workarounded it in pocl by borrowing the > BreakConstantGEPs code from SAFECode. But for SPIR specs, IMHO, this should > be reconsidered. Yes, I agree. On 24 September 2012 15:08, Pekka Jääskeläinen <pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi>wrote: > Well, > > To be honest I'm not very comfortable with the whole constant GEP > idea. It's a

If the powers at be want this, I could easily transform the source to the LLVM coding standards, and add the necessary portable UNIX support--someone else would have to add non-UNIX support although the System library probably helps with this. However I'm guessing the LLVM release flux of the exception system, along with a lack of universal platform, dwarf JIT support might be a hinderance in

> When gk20a_clk_ctor() returns an error code, pointer "clk" > should be released. Such an information is reasonable. > It's the same when gm20b_clk_new() returns from elsewhere following this call. I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more. Can it be that the allocated clock object should be kept usable even after a successful return

The original patch was basically fine. Just add a Fixes tag and resend. regards, dan carpenter

On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > The original patch was basically fine. > > I propose to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more. > > * Should the allocated clock object be kept usable even after > a successful return from this function? Heh. You're right. The patch is freeing "clk" on the

On 2/6/19 9:35 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> however, due to the issues with continuing >> to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to: > > Will the archive repo in kernel.org ever be updated again? > > Will the archive repo in kernel.org be updated when some > potential/hypothetical/future final/gold version gets released? >