search for: recomputes

dear R wizards: I have a large data frame, a million rows, 40 columns. In this data frame, there are some (about 100,000) rows which I want to recompute (update), while I want to leave others just as is. this is based on a condition that I need to compute, based on what is in a few of the columns. what is the right R way to do this? I could subset out the rows that I want to recompute into a

On Jan 4, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Haishan <hndxvon at 163.com> wrote: > At 2014-01-04 06:11:38,"Jakob Stoklund Olesen" <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > >> He really just wants to rerun LiveIntervals analysis, but LiveVariables is no longer available. Would it work just to clear all

Hello all, I need to tap into the collective wisdom of the group re an issue of efficiency. A sketch of the situation: Let's say 4000 observations in variables Y, X1, X2 , X3 and X4. I would like to feed various combinations of this expression Y ~ X1+X2+X3+X4 + I(X1^2)+I(X2^2)+I(X3^2)+I(X4^2) + X1*X2 + X1*X3 + X1*X4 + X2*X3 + X2*X4 + X3*X4 repeatedly to glm(). (I really have little

Thanks, but this is most probably different issue. My maildirsize is computed incorrectly even if I delete it completely and let dovead recompute it so expunging is not in the game. Is there any way how to track/debug the recomputation algorithm in dovecot? On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:02 AM, WJCarpenter <bill-dovecot at carpenter.org> wrote: > A long shot, but here's how I

Hello all, I’m pretty new to LLVM. I'm writing a pass for loop optimization. I clone and rearrange loops, setting the cloned loop as the original loop’s parent. This can be done multiple times, until there is no more work to do. The trouble is, after the first time I do this, the cloned loop's SCEVs become unknown types when they should be AddRecExpr. If I re-run the whole pass on the

On Jan 3, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > He really just wants to rerun LiveIntervals analysis, but LiveVariables is no longer available. Would it work just to clear all the intervals rerun LiveIntervals::computeVirtRegs after all the CFG transforms are complete? Yes, I should think so. /jakob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

At 2014-01-01 04:36:21,"Andrew Trick" <atrick at apple.com> wrote: On Dec 31, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Haishan <hndxvon at 163.com> wrote: Hi, I insert a new machine basic block(MBB) before Greedy Register Allocation, after Simple Register Coalescing. But I encounter a fatal error "regalloc = ... not currently supported with -O0". I use command line with opt level

I an stumbling on something that is probably very simple, but I cannot see the solution. I have an object generated by the table () function and want to recompute this table so each cell represents the percentage of the corresponding row sum. Of course a dedicated function can be written (which I have done), containing the necessary loops etc., but there should be a simpler way. I'd

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:38 PM Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > >>>> Now, the original design only accounted for profile information >>>> *within* a function body, clearly it needs to be extended to support >>>> intraprocedural information. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Not sure what you mean. Profile data

I was looking at the SymbolTable code in LLD COFF and ELF recently, and I’m confused by the use of CachedHashStringRef. From what I understand, a CachedHashStringRef combines a StringRef with a computed hash. There’s no caching going on in the CachedHashStringRef itself; that is, if you construct CachedHashStringRef("foo"), and then construct a second

Hello, This patch fixes PR5382. The problem is that "bu_ls_rr_sort::operator()" and "td_ls_rr_sort::operator()" call getHeight() and getDepth() methods on SUnit, which can recompute values, what invalidates heap (SPQ). This patch guarantees that height and depth values won't be recomputed. The other solution would be to reheapify SPQ everytime when new SUnit is

Caching computation in rails? Simple example: factorial modulus a large number input: integer x output: factorial( x ) % 12345678901234567 I want it so that if it computes factorial of N once, it will not have to compute for N again. code: class SiteController < ApplicationController caches_action :factorial, :inv def examine @inv = @params[''inv''] @outv =

Hi, How can I rerun an analysis pass in the middle of a function pass? In particular, my dominator set needs to be recomputed. It looks like I can manually edit the dominator set with getAnalysisToUpdate. If I could rerun the dominator set pass to get this info automatically, it would save me some time. Thanks.

On 15 Apr 2013, at 16:03, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > See http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6210. Chris is correct at the coarse granularity, but there are some trades to be made at the fine. There is some interesting work from MIT in the context of image processing kernels related to the relative costs of saving intermediates out to cache or DRAM vs recomputing them

On Jan 3, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 2014, at 4:58 AM, Haishan <hndxvon at 163.com> wrote: > >> >> At 2014-01-01 04:36:21,"Andrew Trick" <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Dec 31, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Haishan <hndxvon at 163.com> wrote: >> My update steps are shown

(Resending after removing llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu and using llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org) On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Easwaran Raman <eraman at google.com> wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Is there any update on this? I've been sending patches to get rid of the > callee hotness based inline hints from the frontend and move the logic to > the inliner. The next step is to use

Hello, I'm working on a project that involves archive files and since llvm-link does not currently support them, I have a simple patch (attached) to add this functionality. It isn't really efficient (it recomputes the set of symbols that need to be linked in after each link), and it probably has some problems with append linkage, but so far it has been enough for me. I'd like to clean this up and commit it back to llvm. Would someone like to tell me how to proceed? Thanks. -- gregory malecha http://w...

Hey Everyone! I wanted to carry out Hierarchical clustering using distance matrices i have calculated ( instead of euclidean distance etc.) I understand as.dist is the function for this, but the distances in the dendrogram i got by using the following script(1) were not the distances defined in my distance matrices. script: var<-read.table("the distance matrix i calculated",

- Please do not add any more uses of the LiveVariables pass! It is deprecated and only kept around for one last pass that isn't converted. All new code should use LiveIntervalAnalysis! - Kill flags are optional: If they are present they must be correct, but it is legal to have a value die without having a kill flag on the operand. So often a simple fix is to clear out the kill flags from

Dear R wizards--- I have a wrapper on mclapply() that makes it a little easier for me to do multiprocessing. (Posting this may make life easier for other googlers.) I pass a data frame, a vector that tells me what rows should be recomputed, and the function; and I get back a vector or matrix of answers. d <- data.frame( id=1:6, val=11:16 ) loc <- c(TRUE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE)