Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "recommended_architecture".
2019 Jun 23
3
setting up a new ADS infrastructure
On 23/06/2019 14:34, Stefan Froehlich via samba wrote:
> No need to be sorry - most likely I'll the whole setup from scratch.
> But just to be sure and to avoid new mistakes, after re-reading the
> samba wiki:
>
> I understand that they use the same SAMDOM.EXAMPLE.COM as DNS *and*
> Windows domain which is (for legacy reasons and for a smoother
> transition) something
2019 Jun 24
0
setting up a new ADS infrastructure
...ld be forwarded to another DNS server.
Rowland,
We actually suggest the reverse, due to issues with the forwarding
capacity of both of our DNS options. We suggest a 'normal' DNS server
that delegates the Samba zone (only) to Samba:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Recommended_Architecture
In the past this wasn't possible, but that was due to bugs now fixed in
how we script nsupdate.
I hope this helps clarify things.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org
Samba Developer, C...
2019 Jun 28
4
AD DLZ backend - 'proper' way of doing it
Hey all.
I've got working samba AD server with dlz backend. To avoid performance
issues I'm using external DNS which forwards queries for the AD zone to the
Samba server, like that:
zone "myadzone.int" {
> type forward;
> forwarders { 192.xx.x.xx; };
> };
192.xx.x.xx = my AD Samba.
This way it works alright, but on the external DNS I'm getting
2019 Jun 28
3
AD DLZ backend - 'proper' way of doing it
...s of the various architectures and
wondering about this as well.
Is it required that AD clients point directly at AD DCs? Are there certain
DNS requests (e.g. updates) that won't be forwarded properly by an
intermediary DNS server?
[1]:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Recommended_Architecture
Jonathon
>
2020 May 20
2
Samba DC and DNS best practices
...o I want the DHCP
server to register them somewhere else. Can Samba DNS handle that zone or
should that be handled by BIND/PowerDNS?
Looking to hear about some of the configurations in use by people here.
Thank you,
Jonathon Reinhart
[1]:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Recommended_Architecture
[2]: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2018-December/219978.html