search for: recommendably

Dear helpers, I can create a vector with the priority of the packages that came with R, like this: > installed.packages()[,"Priority"]->my.vector > my.vector base boot class cluster codetools "base" "recommended" "recommended" "recommended" "recommended" compiler datasets

Dear list, I've just upgraded to Fedora Core 2 and seeing as there wasn't an rpm for this OS on CRAN yet I thought it was about time I had a go at compiling R myself. Having run into the X11 problem I switched to trying to install R-patched. I followed the instructions in the R Installation & Admin manual to download the sources of the Recommended packages and place the files in

Hi, I am building 2.1.0 (re-release version, if that matters) on a Windows XP machine. Following the instructions 3.1 "Building from source" in R-admin.html, I managed to get up to 3.1.6. But when I try to build the recommended packages, I get C:\hiro\codes\proj\R-2.1.0\src\gnuwin32>make recommended --- Unpacking recommended packages ---- VR make[1]: *** No rule to make target

Hi folks, I'm having a problem with installing R on Solaris. Has anyone seen a similar issue? I don't find any hits on the search engines. Thanks. Environment: SunOS xxxx 5.10 Generic_118822-25 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R During the installation/compilation of R-2.10.1 I get the following error: begin installing recommended package boot ERROR: cannot extract package from

libguestfs usually needs qemu. However it only requires an emulator for the same architecture, not for all architectures. libvirt-daemon-kvm pulls in qemu which pulls in emulators for all architectures, as well as a bunch of other stuff we don't need at all like network interface support and nwfilter. There are no Fedora TCG-only arches, so drop the conditional section. I also made support

R 2.10.1 is used in the Sage maths project. Several recommended packages (Matrix, class, mgcv, nnet, rpart, spatial, and survival) are failing to build on Solaris 10 (SPARC). We would like to be able to get a list of the recommended packages for R 2.10.1, but ideally via a call to R, so it is not necessary to update that list every time a new version of R is released. We do not want to access

Hola! I just changed my laptop to debian squeeze, downloaded R devel from svn repo, as described in the manual. Then I configured for building in a separate build dir with: kjetil at kjetil:~/R/Rbuilddir$ sudo ../svn/configure --- which succeeded, with: R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Source directory: ../svn Installation directory: /usr/local C

>>>>> G?bor Cs?rdi >>>>> on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:55:36 +0200 writes: > I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R > 4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0. Yes, it *is* available from CRAN: You can see it when looking into the 4.4.0/ , specifically the 4.4.0/Recommended/ sub directory. Recommended packages should be built

I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > On 13.06.2010 01:09, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> >> On 06/12/10 05:27 PM, Douglas Bates wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Dr. David Kirkby >>> <david.kirkby at onetel.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> R 2.10.1 is used in

Some suggestions for the recommendations on http://reactor-core.org/ogg-tag-recommendations.html: Add in a table of contents. Please. Rename the title to "Vorbis-style Comment Field Recommendations" (change capitalization to taste) to reflect that FLACs and Speex files could be tagged according to this recommendation. Do note that not just Ogg (or, for that matter, .ogg) files can use

Hi, Trying to compile one of the latest snapshot tarballs of R-devel gives me the following error (64-bit openSUSE 10.3): ... make[2]: Entering directory `/loc/home/biocbuild/bbs-2.4-bioc/R/src/library/Recommended' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `VR.ts', needed by `stamp-recommended'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory

Hey, I want to compile R version 2.9.1 on debian stable but the make command stops with this message: ... >>> Building/Updating help pages for package 'tcltk' Formats: text html latex example make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/R/R-2.9.1/src/library' make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/R/R-2.9.1/src/library' make[1]: Entering directory

Hi, I get a compilation error with last available R devel snapshot (R-devel_2007-08-12.tar.gz, r42483): ==================== CONFIGURE ==================== hpages at wilson1:~/R-2.6.broken> ~/src/R-2.6.r42483/configure checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu [...] R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Source

Good day all, I have been searching on google for the recommended repo for php 5.2.3 + for centos... I saw at one point it was in the testing repo, but was pulled due to no one testing it. Is there a recommended repo that people feel is safe for a CentOS 5.x to get php 5.23 + ? I know i can compile and install, but i like to keep as "vanilla" as possible. Thanks in advance.

Running a current, standard debian stable, I added deb http://cran.R-project.org/bin/linux/debian stable/ to /apt/sources.list to get the current backport stable distro. When I installed r-base, apt-get wanted to remove all my previous r-cran-* packages and I let it, but encountered conflicts with things in r-recommended that I've been unable to resolve. It first showed up as (complete

When I try to install R-patched of January 26 on my linux (fedora core 1, with openmosix kernel) box, make fails in the first recommended package with the message tkStartGUI text html latex tkpager text html latex make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/setzer/newstuff/R-patched/src/library' make[2]: Entering directory

I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R 4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0. However, currently CRAN has Package: Matrix Version: 1.6-5 Priority: recommended Depends: R (>= 3.5.0), methods ... (plus another version for R >= 4.5.0 only). Which has some weird consequences, e.g. if I have an R 4.4.0 installation without the recommended packages, I don't have a way of

Hi When attempting to install R in version 2.15 (for testing purposes) on a clean Ubuntu 12.04 machine from the CRAN Ubuntu repository, I can't seem to install r-recommended: + sudo apt-get install --no-install-recommends r-base-dev=2.15.3-1precise0precise1 r-base-core=2.15.3-1precise0precise1 r-recommended=2.15.3-1precise0precise1 qpdf Reading package lists... Done Building dependency

Hi, just for information: On Suse 10.3 x86 > make check fails, if configure was called with --without-recommended-packages for the latest beta. The problem I stumbled upon is located in utlis. Here comes the relevant part of utils-Ex.Rout.fail in R-2.7.0/tests/Examples > ### ** Examples > > require(stats) > glmout <- capture.output(example(glm)) Fehler in