search for: recomendaton

...red, thank you. I am interested in using speex in a VOIP application. do i need to put it in into the ogg contianer format in order to encode/decode and send it? or will it work "as is"? if the latter then: "the packet is larger than the allocated buffer" message: whats your recomendaton for fixing that? i was thinking simply getting the size of the frame and using the speex_bits_init_buffer() function to create a bigger buffer. However i want to keep latency in mind and make them as small as possible. i apologise if the questions seem simple but i've working at this for sevr...

...to put it >> in >> into >> the ogg contianer format in order to encode/decode and send it? or will >> it >> work >> "as is"? if the latter then: >> >> "the packet is larger than the allocated buffer" message: whats your >> recomendaton for fixing that? i was thinking simply getting the size of >> the >> frame >> and using the speex_bits_init_buffer() function to create a bigger >> buffer. >> However i >> want to keep latency in mind and make them as small as possible. >> >> i apol...

...in using speex in a VOIP application. do i need to put it in > into > the ogg contianer format in order to encode/decode and send it? or will it > work > "as is"? if the latter then: > > "the packet is larger than the allocated buffer" message: whats your > recomendaton for fixing that? i was thinking simply getting the size of the > frame > and using the speex_bits_init_buffer() function to create a bigger buffer. > However i > want to keep latency in mind and make them as small as possible. > > i apologise if the questions seem simple but i'...

...at in order to encode/decode and send it? >>>> or will it >>>> work >>>> "as is"? if the latter then: >>>> >>>> "the packet is larger than the allocated buffer" message: whats >>>> your >>>> recomendaton for fixing that? i was thinking simply getting the >>>> size of the >>>> frame >>>> and using the speex_bits_init_buffer() function to create a >>>> bigger buffer. >>>> However i >>>> want to keep latency in mind and make t...

Hi, I've enocded and decoded a file using speexencexe/speexdec.exe respectively. However when i use the example code to encode a file and use speexdec.exe to decode it; not only do i get a file that is 3kb larger than if i had encoded it with the .exe but also I get a "this doesn't look like a speex file" message, and it is unable to decode it. I've checked around and it

...to put it >> in >> into >> the ogg contianer format in order to encode/decode and send it? or will >> it >> work >> "as is"? if the latter then: >> >> "the packet is larger than the allocated buffer" message: whats your >> recomendaton for fixing that? i was thinking simply getting the size of >> the >> frame >> and using the speex_bits_init_buffer() function to create a bigger >> buffer. >> However i >> want to keep latency in mind and make them as small as possible. >> >> i apol...

...gt; into >>> the ogg contianer format in order to encode/decode and send it? or will >>> it >>> work >>> "as is"? if the latter then: >>> >>> "the packet is larger than the allocated buffer" message: whats your >>> recomendaton for fixing that? i was thinking simply getting the size of >>> the >>> frame >>> and using the speex_bits_init_buffer() function to create a bigger >>> buffer. >>> However i >>> want to keep latency in mind and make them as small as possible....

...plication. do i need to put it in into the ogg contianer format in order to encode/decode and send it? or will it work "as is"? if the latter then: "the packet is larger than the allocated buffer" message: whats your recomendaton for fixing that? i was thinking simply getting the size of the frame and using the speex_bits_init_buffer() function to create a bigger buffer. However i want to keep latency in mind and make them as small as possible. i apologise if the questions...