search for: recoginz

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "recoginz".

Did you mean: recoginze
2003 May 05
1
dovecot.spec
hi, I'm just recoginze that dovecot contains an rpm spec file. unfortunately it's not too useful since an rpm -ta dovecot-.x.y.tar.gz can't be used since just the dovecot.spec.in is in the tarbar and not the actual spec file (which is in this from not useful in the above form). anyway here is my patch to the...
2011 Mar 24
1
[LLVMdev] Make PPC JIT support inline assembly?
Hi, Very few inline assembly are supported for the X86 backend. As I see from X86ISelLowering.cpp, only bswap, rorw, xchgl and simple register selections (e.g. {=r10}) LLVM JIT can recoginze. But for PPC backend, I am not sure why PPC JIT see all inline assembly IRs as an error. Ding-Yong On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi 陳韋任, > > > It seems PPC JIT does not recognize inline assembly. > > For example, when I gi...
2018 Apr 08
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special
2018 Apr 08
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special
2006 Jun 05
0
Proper Directory Structure / Path for Rails Install
I have Ruby installed & working but I''ve been having all kinds of trouble installing Rails on Win XP. For example, if I just do the "gem install rails" command, it does not recoginze gem as a proper command. If I cd into the ruby\bin directory, it does but then cannot find the local rails file. If I specify the full path for rails, it finds the file & begins the install but errors out complaining, "No metadata found!" All this leads me to believe I need to...
2006 Jul 12
0
FW: Problem using 3.0.23 client in a domain with a Samba 3.0.20c PDC. -- REVISED I am using V3.x.x
...le that I have been using for years: [atest] . . "valid users = auser" . . If I remove this line, I get connected to the share, however, of course I lose any username protection. I have tried using write list = or even admin users = ... All to no avail. The log file indicates seems to recoginze my id but then finally at the end gets some type of deny message: [2006/07/11 15:38:34, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (127.0.0.1) [2006/07/11 15:39:37, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(309) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [auser] -> [auser] -&gt...
2011 Mar 24
0
[LLVMdev] Make PPC JIT support inline assembly?
Hi 陳韋任, > It seems PPC JIT does not recognize inline assembly. > For example, when I give LLVM IR belows to PPC JIT, > > %0 = tail call i32* asm "", "={r10}"() nounwind ;<i32*> [#uses=1] > > it complaints that inline assembly is not a supported > instruction. x86 JIT works fine, however. I'm surprised this worked with the x86 JIT - I
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...t of this approach, rather than being neccessary for users to be aware of. All what the user needs to deal with is one single interface, and that's what they care about. It's more a trouble than help when they see 2 extra interfaces are present. Management tools in the old distros don't recoginze them and try to bring up those extra interfaces for its own. Various odd warnings start to spew out, and there's a lot of caveats for the users to get around... On the other hand, if we "teach" those cloud users to update the userspace toolstack just for trading a feature they don...
2011 Mar 24
3
[LLVMdev] Make PPC JIT support inline assembly?
Hi, all It seems PPC JIT does not recognize inline assembly. For example, when I give LLVM IR belows to PPC JIT, %0 = tail call i32* asm "", "={r10}"() nounwind ; <i32*> [#uses=1] it complaints that inline assembly is not a supported instruction. x86 JIT works fine, however. Is there a reason that makes PPC JIT not support inline assembly? Currently, we
2018 Apr 18
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...rather than being neccessary > for users to be aware of. All what the user needs to deal with is one > single interface, and that's what they care about. It's more a trouble > than help when they see 2 extra interfaces are present. Management > tools in the old distros don't recoginze them and try to bring up > those extra interfaces for its own. Various odd warnings start to spew > out, and there's a lot of caveats for the users to get around... > > On the other hand, if we "teach" those cloud users to update the > userspace toolstack just for trad...
2006 Jul 12
3
Problem using 2.0.23 client in a domain with a Samba 2.0.20c PDC.
...le that I have been using for years: [atest] . . "valid users = auser" . . If I remove this line, I get connected to the share, however, of course I lose any username protection. I have tried using write list = or even admin users = ... All to no avail. The log file indicates seems to recoginze my id but then finally at the end gets some type of deny message: [2006/07/11 15:38:34, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (127.0.0.1) [2006/07/11 15:39:37, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(309) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [auser] -> [auser] -&gt...
2018 Apr 18
0
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...g neccessary >> for users to be aware of. All what the user needs to deal with is one >> single interface, and that's what they care about. It's more a trouble >> than help when they see 2 extra interfaces are present. Management >> tools in the old distros don't recoginze them and try to bring up >> those extra interfaces for its own. Various odd warnings start to spew >> out, and there's a lot of caveats for the users to get around... >> >> On the other hand, if we "teach" those cloud users to update the >> userspace too...
2004 Aug 06
5
multiple liveice sources
Hi, I am trying to stream two different sources with two soundcards using liveice and icecast, all from single Linux box. Can anyone tell me if this is possible? I tried creating two sets in the liveice config file where I specified different devices. No erros but the latter source was streamed on both mount points. Running two instances of liveice talking to one instance of icecast failed.