search for: reclaim_dma_bufs

...mory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. Changes since v7: - Rebased to virtio-next branch. - Removed extra added lines. - Removed superfluous checks before calling reclaim_dma_bufs(). - Rusty raised some question regarding garbage collection of the out-vq, so I moved this into a separate patch. Thanks, Sjur Sjur Br?ndeland (3): virtio_console: Merge struct buffer_token into struct port_buffer virtio_console: Add support for remoteproc serial virtio_console: Remove...

...mory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. Changes since v7: - Rebased to virtio-next branch. - Removed extra added lines. - Removed superfluous checks before calling reclaim_dma_bufs(). - Rusty raised some question regarding garbage collection of the out-vq, so I moved this into a separate patch. Thanks, Sjur Sjur Br?ndeland (3): virtio_console: Merge struct buffer_token into struct port_buffer virtio_console: Add support for remoteproc serial virtio_console: Remove...

...----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > index 468f061..3e56f32 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void) > } > } > > -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size, > +static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t buf_size, > int pages) > { > struct port_buffer *buf; > @@ -445,16 +445,16 @@ static...

...----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > index 468f061..3e56f32 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void) > } > } > > -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size, > +static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t buf_size, > int pages) > { > struct port_buffer *buf; > @@ -445,16 +445,16 @@ static...

...e up dma-buffers to be freed later */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&list_lock, flags); + list_add_tail(&buf->list, &pending_free_list); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list_lock, flags); + return; + +freebuf: kfree(buf); } -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(size_t buf_size) +static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void) +{ + unsigned long flags; + struct port_buffer *buf, *tmp; + LIST_HEAD(tmp_list); + + WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()); + if (list_empty(&pending_free_list)) + return; + + BUG_ON(!rproc_enabled); + + /* Create a copy of the pending_free_list while holding the lock*/ + spin_lock_irqsave(&list...

...e up dma-buffers to be freed later */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&list_lock, flags); + list_add_tail(&buf->list, &pending_free_list); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list_lock, flags); + return; + +freebuf: kfree(buf); } -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(size_t buf_size) +static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void) +{ + unsigned long flags; + struct port_buffer *buf, *tmp; + LIST_HEAD(tmp_list); + + WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()); + if (list_empty(&pending_free_list)) + return; + + BUG_ON(!rproc_enabled); + + /* Create a copy of the pending_free_list while holding the lock*/ + spin_lock_irqsave(&list...

This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. NOTE: These two patches are identical to first two patches of the V8 patch-set, but are rebased to

This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. NOTE: These two patches are identical to first two patches of the V8 patch-set, but are rebased to

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> I thought rebasing rproc_serial to linux-next was going to be trivial. But when starting the merge I realized that I had to refactor the the patches from Masami Hiramatsu. The splice support has the same issue as I faced, with different type of buffers in the out_vq. So I ended up refactoring the splice functionality. The code size

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> I thought rebasing rproc_serial to linux-next was going to be trivial. But when starting the merge I realized that I had to refactor the the patches from Masami Hiramatsu. The splice support has the same issue as I faced, with different type of buffers in the out_vq. So I ended up refactoring the splice functionality. The code size

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. This patch-set is a rework of the

From: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. This patch-set is a rework of the

...har/virtio_console.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c index 468f061..3e56f32 100644 --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void) } } -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size, +static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t buf_size, int pages) { struct port_buffer *buf; @@ -445,16 +445,16 @@ static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtque...

...insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > > index 468f061..3e56f32 100644 > > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c > > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static void reclaim_dma_bufs(void) > > } > > } > > > > -static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, size_t buf_size, > > +static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t buf_size, > > int pages) > > { > > struct port_buffer...

Turns out virtio console tries to take a buffer out of an active vq. Works by sheer luck, and is explicitly forbidden by spec. And while going over it I saw that error handling is also broken - failure is easy to trigger if I force allocations to fail. Lightly tested. Michael S. Tsirkin (6): virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq virtio: add ability to iterate over vqs virtio_console:

Turns out virtio console tries to take a buffer out of an active vq. Works by sheer luck, and is explicitly forbidden by spec. And while going over it I saw that error handling is also broken - failure is easy to trigger if I force allocations to fail. Lightly tested. Michael S. Tsirkin (6): virtio_console: don't tie bufs to a vq virtio: add ability to iterate over vqs virtio_console: