search for: recki

...> wrote: > Dear Jan, > > It is unavoidable to have OS and R dependencies for devtools. The building > process for packages is both OS and R dependent, so devtools has to be too > according to my understanding. > > Cheers > Joris > > On 14 Jun 2016 18:56, "Jan G?recki" <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > > I'm perfectly aware of it. Any idea when devtools would be shipped as > a base R package, or at least recommended package? To actually answer > the problem described in my email. > I have range of useful funct...

...rence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote: > I agree that the utils package needs some improvements related to > this, and hope to make them eventually. This type of feedback is very > helpful. > > Thanks, > Michael > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Jan G?recki <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> wrote: >> Dear Joris, >> >> So it does looks like the proposed function makes a lot sense then, isn't it? >> >> Cheers, >> Jan >> >> On 16 June 2016 at 08:37, Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote: >&gt...

...ws to easily install all package dependencies just based on DESCRIPTION file, so simplify that in custom CI workflows to: if (length(pkgs<-package.dependencies.dcf(which="all"))) install.packages(pkgs) And would not require to install custom packages or shell scripts. Regards, Jan Gorecki

I agree that the utils package needs some improvements related to this, and hope to make them eventually. This type of feedback is very helpful. Thanks, Michael On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Jan G?recki <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> wrote: > Dear Joris, > > So it does looks like the proposed function makes a lot sense then, isn't it? > > Cheers, > Jan > > On 16 June 2016 at 08:37, Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear Jan, >> >> It...

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:26:58AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:22:30PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-G?recki wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:50:53AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > The second bullet looks at first pretty interesting from this PoV, > > > > see?http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-157.html?for info on the XSA and > > > > the various...

On 19.05.23 12:10, Marek Marczykowski-G?recki wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:04:05AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:18:39PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-G?recki wrote: >>> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 03:42:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> Remove the dangerous late initializati...

...problems. Because of this the framebuffer region might still be reserved even after drm_fb_helper_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers() returned. Don't consider pci_request_region() failure for the framebuffer region as fatal error to workaround this issue. Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-G?recki <marmarek at invisiblethingslab.com> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c index b615b7dfdd9d..a3...

...problems. Because of this the framebuffer region might still be reserved even after drm_fb_helper_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers() returned. Don't consider pci_request_region() failure for the framebuffer region as fatal error to workaround this issue. Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-G?recki <marmarek at invisiblethingslab.com> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c index b615b7dfdd9d..a3...

...package and `_R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_` env var. Is there any R core dev team recommendation/suggestion on that? and don't you thing new field `testChecker` in DESCRIPTION could help for batch checking pkgs? Installing all suggested packages of all reverse dependencies doesn't scale. Jan Gorecki

Dear Jan, It is unavoidable to have OS and R dependencies for devtools. The building process for packages is both OS and R dependent, so devtools has to be too according to my understanding. Cheers Joris On 14 Jun 2016 18:56, "Jan G?recki" <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> wrote: Hi Thierry, I'm perfectly aware of it. Any idea when devtools would be shipped as a base R package, or at least recommended package? To actually answer the problem described in my email. I have range of useful functions available tools/utils packag...

On 4 April 2016 at 07:25, Hadley Wickham wrote: | On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Jan G?recki <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> wrote: | | In principle, I believe a package should pass R CMD check if no | suggested packages are installed. However, since this is not currently The relevant manual says The 'Suggests' field uses the same syntax as 'Depends' and lists pac...

...now with a combination of options, though, if that's really what you want (which would allow your package to pass when _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_ is set to false). ~G On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Jan G?recki <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> wrote: > > Dear R team, > > > > Are suggested dependencies mandatory in context of `R CMD check` when > > using env var `_R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE`? > > > > Suggested dependencies are nice because are optional. > > But t...

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk < konrad.wilk at oracle.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 05:12:04PM +0100, Tommi Airikka wrote: > > Xen developers, > > > > After an upgrade of my Debian Jessie dom0 and domUs, my passthroughed > > NIC stopped working. > > This bug was probably introduced in Debian Jessie sometime > > between

On 04/04/2016 01:56 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 04/04/2016 1:35 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> On 4 April 2016 at 07:25, Hadley Wickham wrote: >> | On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Jan G?recki <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> >> wrote: >> | >> | In principle, I believe a package should pass R CMD check if no >> | suggested packages are installed. However, since this is not currently >> >> The relevant manual says >> >> The 'Suggest...

...XSA-155 patches (including one for pciback), especially not XSA-157. Maybe on some code path, some value is not copied back to pdev->sh_info->op? [1] https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/e64792c5-b9af-42ac-8d67-adce426b9dcb%40googlegroups.com -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-G?recki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available UR...

...lper_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers() returned. Out of curiosity: what's going wrong here? Best regards Thomas > > Don't consider pci_request_region() failure for the framebuffer > region as fatal error to workaround this issue. > > Reported-by: Marek Marczykowski-G?recki <marmarek at invisiblethingslab.com> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/boc...

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Jan G?recki <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl> wrote: > Dear R team, > > Are suggested dependencies mandatory in context of `R CMD check` when > using env var `_R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE`? > > Suggested dependencies are nice because are optional. > But that feature often isn't valid w...

...about new option `--ignore-vignettes` to `R CMD check`. I would expect it to be mentioned somewhere in "1.4.2 Non-Sweave vignettes". Checked on https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html and https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/trunk/doc/manual/R-exts.texi Regards, Jan Gorecki [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:18:39PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-G?recki wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 03:42:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Remove the dangerous late initialization of xen-swiotlb in > > pci_xen_swiotlb_init_late and instead just always initialize > > xen-swiotlb in the boot code if CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND is enabled....

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:10:26PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-G?recki wrote: > While I would say PCI passthrough is not very common for PV guests, can > the decision about xen-swiotlb be delayed until you can enumerate > xenstore to check if there are any PCI devices connected (and not > allocate xen-swiotlb by default if there are none)? This would >...