search for: recipient_delimited

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 350 matches for "recipient_delimited".

Did you mean: recipient_delimiter
2020 Mar 15
2
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
On 15/03/2020 21:26, GMX Account wrote: > have a look at this: > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter > > [...]When the recipient_delimiter [1] set contains multiple characters > (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user name or .forward file name is > separated from its extension by the first character that matches the > recipient_delimiter [1] set.[...]
2020 Mar 15
2
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
On 15/03/2020 20:26, Peter wrote: > Poorly documented, imo, but you want lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox = yes: Thanks, tried it, but no, that's not what I want and it doesn't help in my case. To recap: If I set recipient_delimiter to "+-" (or "-" alone), having a user named "foo-bar" won't work anymore, because Dovecot always tries to deliver to user
2013 Sep 25
2
recipient_delimiter
Can I enable $recipient_delimiter = ?+? for only the virtual sql users? $ doveconf -n # 2.2.5: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE i386 auth_mechanisms = PLAIN LOGIN disable_plaintext_auth = no first_valid_uid = 89 login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> %r %m %c mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir mail_max_userip_connections = 90 managesieve_notify_capability =
2014 Jan 28
1
recipient_delimiter -- feature request
Hi, It would be nice if the recipient_delimiter configuration option supported multiple recipient delimiters as Postfix now does. e.g. now if I set: recipient_delimiter = +- in Postfix, then test-extension at sample.com and test+extension at sample.com are both recognized. But if I set: recipient_delimiter = +- in Dovecot, neither of the above are recognized and instead test+-extension at
2016 Aug 23
4
Sub addressing delimiters
Hello, There is a disconnect between the way Postfix handles recipient_delimiter and the way Dovecot handles it. For Postfix, it is a set of delimiters that can each individually be used to separate the address from the . In Dovecot, having multiple characters in recipient_delimiters simply makes it a multi-character single delimiter. For my purposes, the Postfix method is much more
2020 Mar 15
0
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
Hi, have a look at this: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter [...]When the recipient_delimiter [1] set contains multiple characters (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user name or .forward file name is separated from its extension by the first character that matches the recipient_delimiter [1] set.[...] --- Original Nachricht --- Betreff:?Re: lmtp and recipient_delimiter
2020 Mar 15
0
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
On Sonntag, 15. M?rz 2020 21:43:08 CET Juri Haberland wrote: > On 15/03/2020 21:26, GMX Account wrote: > > have a look at this: > > > > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter > > > > [...]When the recipient_delimiter [1] set contains multiple characters > > (Postfix 2.11 and later), a user name or .forward file name is > >
2009 Feb 12
2
delivering to folder based on recipient_delimiter?
...so that postfix accepts mail for user at example.com, user+foo at example.com, and user+spam at example.com all deliver to inbox. what I would like is to have email directed to user+foo at example.com delivered to the IMAP folder foo (and, in the context of amavisd, have amavis configured for recipient_delimited, and add addr_extension_spam_maps add +spam to each mail identified as spam, and thus the mail would go to the spam folder on delivery. The postfix guys say I should be able to do this. can someone point me to how to implement this with dovecot? (as I don't see how to even start). Thx Ric...
2015 Apr 14
2
Dovecot and recipient_delimiter
Hi, we're using thunderbird as our client, it has the functionality to sort spamassassin tagged mails in a folder called 'Junk'. I have this folder on my dovecot server and i'd like to use the recipient_delimiter feature to get my spam/junk mails directly to this folder. what i have done yet: dovecot.conf: plugin { recipient_delimiter = + } postfix: master.cf dovecot
2016 Mar 31
2
multiple recipient_delimiter
Hello, does the recipient_delimiter option accepts multiple delimiter by now? -- Regards J?rg Backschues
2015 Apr 14
0
Dovecot and recipient_delimiter
Am 14.04.2015 um 14:04 schrieb J. Echter: > Hi, > > we're using thunderbird as our client, it has the functionality to > sort spamassassin tagged mails in a folder called 'Junk'. > > I have this folder on my dovecot server and i'd like to use the > recipient_delimiter feature to get my spam/junk mails directly to this > folder. > > what i have done
2010 May 26
4
recipient_delimiter
I have recipient_delimiter = + in main.cf (Postfix). But deliveries to dovecot/deliver are still being rejected. It appears that the full email is still in the envelope (e.g. phil+howard at example.com which I want to be delivered to phil at example.com). Is that how it's supposed to work and Dovecot just doesn't support this?
2016 Apr 10
2
Plus addressing on Sentora using Postfix
> In dovecots 15-lda.conf uncomment the "recipient_delimiter = +" setting. The delimiter is configured in postfix but apparently not in your dovecot lda config I am not sure of the location of 15-lda.conf, however in my main dovecot.conf file I added "recipient_delimiter = +" The output of the lad part of "dovecot -n" is now > protocol lda { >
2020 Mar 12
0
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
> Le 11 mars 2020 ? 19:32, Juri Haberland <juri at koschikode.com> a ?crit : > > Hi list, > > I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. > Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both > Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that have a '-' in it's > username can't
2013 Jan 12
1
[PATCH] LMTP: Permit user IDs containing recipient_delimiter
The Dovecot 2.1 LMTP server currently always strips the address extension from a recipient address (if recipient_delimiter is set), meaning user IDs cannot contain the recipient delimiter character, e.g. "user+foo" is not supported. This was surprising for me, as Postfix behaves differently in this regard: It first looks up "user+foo", and only then "user". The
2016 Jun 16
2
Recipient delimiter and lmtp proxying
Hi, I'm attempting to proxy lmtp using director to hash to the same backend as pop3/imap. My pop3/imap users are of the form: username and my lmtp users are of the form: <username at domain> Where domain is fairly redundant but does carry some useful information. Now, I can proxy lmtp using user=%{username} and destuser=%{orig_user}, and this all appears to work correctly.
2019 Nov 16
2
Sieve and recipient_delimiter
I use recipient_delimiter addresseses quiet a bit, and I want to put several of them into a mailbox if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ ?FOO", ?foo", ?bar", ?florin"]) { fileinto :create ?later"; stop; } When I get an email addressed to me+FOO at example.com or me_florin at example.com, the messages end up in my inbox (Yes, I have both + and _
2013 Oct 23
1
recipient_delimiter deux
OK, I've been banging my head on why my procmail setup for virtual users is no longer working (difficult to test, since enabling it breaks live user's mail). There are only a few virtual users who have any sort of filters in place anyway (the heavy procmail users are local, not virtual), and they are fairly simple, so I think I can recreate them with sieve. I think I have everything I
2020 Mar 11
2
lmtp and recipient_delimiter
Hi list, I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that have a '-' in it's username can't receive mail anymore, because lmtp truncates the localpart after the '-' and of course can't find the first
2019 May 15
0
LMTP and Sieve with <prefix><recipient_delimiter><user>
Hi, way forward could be like this: 1) Introduce a new config option 'detail_affix' with parameters 'prefix' and 'suffix', defaulting to 'suffix' making sure not to break existing setups using <user><delimiter><suffix> respectively :user<delimiter>:detail format. If 'detail_affix' is switched to 'prefix' the expected