search for: recids

I appreciate the help I've been given so far. The issue I face is that the data I'm working with has 53000 rows, so in calculating distance, finding all recids that fall within 2km and summing the population, etc. - a) takes too long and b) have no sense of progress. Below is a loop that reads each recid one at a time, calculates the distance and identifies the recids that fall within 2 km. It iterates through all records successfully. Where I'm st...

On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Giles Coochey wrote: > > On 02/08/2019 19:38, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:19:49AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > Fred Smith wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:28:23AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > <MVNCH> > > I've been using fail2ban for some time, I have a number of ports open

Hi all, I've been struggling learning R and need to turn to the list again. I've got a dataset (comma-delimited file) with the following fields: recid, latitude, longitude, population, dwelling and age. For each observation, I'd like to calculate the total number of people and dwellings and average age within 2 k.m. Distance could be Euclidean, however, a proper distance

On 05/08/2019 09:18, Pete Biggs wrote: >> I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers. >> So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the >> second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week. >> > Oh definitely. My systems are set to "3 bans and you're out" - a > recidive ban is permanent after three

hello list, i need your help about cdr ,i have installed the module cdr in my asterisk 1.4 . for the inbound calls when i call my sip exten like below : exten => 506,1,Dial(SIP/223, 10) exten => 506,n,Dial(SIP/276, 10) in CDR i have just one line with SIP /276 the last line but there is no historic for the first SIP 223 recid Record ID | calldate |clid |src

> > > > /var/log/fail2ban.log is showing that it's working: > > I have seem similar odd behaviour with f2b with other filters. > Try to uninstall the package > fail2ban-systemd > and stop and start fail2ban again. > This might change its behavior to the better. > The fail2ban-systemd package configures fail2ban to use systemd journal for log input. The OP

> > I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers. > So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the > second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week. > Oh definitely. My systems are set to "3 bans and you're out" - a recidive ban is permanent after three other bans. I have large parts of some subnets in my ban

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:31:56AM +0100, Giles Coochey wrote: > > On 05/08/2019 09:18, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers. > > > So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the > > > second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week. > > > > > Oh definitely. My

Full_Name: Bert Gunter Version: 2.0.0 patched OS: Win2000 Submission from: (NULL) (192.12.78.250) The TRUE/FALSE options of the colnames argument in sqlFetch (RODBC) seem to be reversed, at least for .xls files. ## z is a connection to an xls workbook opened by odbcConnectExcel() > dat<-sqlFetch(z,'SuccessRates',colnames=FALSE) > dat[1:5,] RecID Name Run Grams Lost Run

P? Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:53:38 +0000 John H Nyhuis <jnyhuis at uw.edu> skrev: > Just a random stab in the dark, but CEntOS6 was iptables, and CentOS7 > is firewalld. They take different fail2ban packages. > > CentOS6 = fail2ban > CentOS7 = fail2ban-firewalld > > Are you sure you are running the correct fail2ban package for your > firewall? (I screwed this up myself

Dear Tariq; About elastix.org, this can be use with Asterisk or it is coming as a complete IP Telephony, Call Center, IVR and Reporting? Because, I do not need to install another IP Telephony on the server which already has asterisk which is an IP Telephony, this will cause a problem in the service (for example, when listening for SIP port of 5060).

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

Hi: i am surveying ip phones for our company. we will use them with asterisk. we have office in taiwan, hong kong,singapore and china. cisco and polycom are too expensive for us. we try several china brand ip phones. they are all cheap and some of them have good quality. but most of them won't offer future firmware support, which we think it's important for ip phones.

Hi, I would like to report that Tuncmatik Newtech Pro 1 KVA (http://www.tuncmatik.com/en-US/productDetail.asp?RecID=290) works with nut(2.4.1) blazer_usb, blazer_ser and megatec drivers. The UPS came with an usb cable and a java based software for both linux and windows, named ViewPower (http://www-power-software-download.com). This UPS has double interface a USB interface and a serial

I am being attacked by an entire subnet where the first two parts of the IP address remain identical but the last two parts vary sufficiently that it is not caught by fail2ban since the attempts do not meet the cut-off of a certain number of attempts within the given time. Has anyone created a fail2ban filter for this type of attack? As of right now, I have manually banned a range of IP addresses

On 05/08/2019 08:50, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > I've found the default 10min bans hardly bother some attackers. > So I've added the "recidive" feature of fail2ban. After the > second 10min ban, the attacker is blocked for 1 week. > Interesting, didn't know about that feature, but, oh, I just generally ban for a whole week regardless, yes, I realise that a typo

> Has anyone created a fail2ban filter for this type of attack? As of > right now, I have manually banned a range of IP addresses but would > like to automate it for the future. > As far as I can see fail2ban only deals with hosts and not networks - I suspect the issue is what is a "network": It may be obvious to you looking at the logs that these are all related, but you

On 1/9/20 2:08 AM, Pete Biggs wrote: >> Has anyone created a fail2ban filter for this type of attack? As of >> right now, I have manually banned a range of IP addresses but would >> like to automate it for the future. >> > As far as I can see fail2ban only deals with hosts and not networks - I > suspect the issue is what is a "network": It may be obvious to