search for: recheck

...le for such a thing. Can enable_signalling fail? What's the reason for fence_signaled() in the first place? > It doesn't need to be completely reliable, or finish immediately. > > And any time wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue) is called all the fences that were enabled will be rechecked. I raised this already somewhere else, but should we have some common infrastructure in the core fence code to recheck fences periodically? radeon doesn't seem to be the only hw where this isn't reliable enough. Of course timer-based rechecking would only work if the driver provides the...

...enable_signalling fail? What's the reason for fence_signaled() in the first place? >>> It doesn't need to be completely reliable, or finish immediately. >>> >>> And any time wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue) is called all the fences that were enabled will be rechecked. >> I raised this already somewhere else, but should we have some common >> infrastructure in the core fence code to recheck fences periodically? >> radeon doesn't seem to be the only hw where this isn't reliable >> enough. Of course timer-based rechecking would on...

...oblem since now it holds a reference. > > dlm_get_lock_resource() --> Line 701 in dlmmaster.c > if (res->owner != dlm->node_num) --> Line 1023 in dlmmaster.c (Access > res->owner) Do you mean in dlm_wait_for_lock_mastery()? Even if owner changes suddenly, it will recheck, so I think it is also fine. Thanks, Joseph > > The variables res->lockname.name and res->owner are accessed respectively > without holding the lock res->spinlock, and thus data races can occur. > > I am not quite sure whether these possible data races are real and how t...

hi before checking in that chown fix, i wanted you to take a look. tested on my workstation. basicaly the patch takes care that logtail saves the offset file with the correct permissions. when playing around lately with file tampering and those invoking logcheck as root. i got similar output to #253998 Alfie may point out that i should not invoke logcheck as root, but i better fix that before

..."$@" >$log_file 2>&1 +estatus=$? +end_t="$(date +'%s')" + +if test $enable_hard_errors = no && test $estatus -eq 99; then + tweaked_estatus=1 +else + tweaked_estatus=$estatus +fi + +case $tweaked_estatus:$expect_failure in + 0:yes) col=$red res=XPASS recheck=yes gcopy=yes;; + 0:*) col=$grn res=PASS recheck=no gcopy=no;; + 77:*) col=$blu res=SKIP recheck=no gcopy=yes;; + 99:*) col=$mgn res=ERROR recheck=yes gcopy=yes;; + *:yes) col=$lgn res=XFAIL recheck=no gcopy=yes;; + *:*) col=$red res=FAIL recheck=yes gcopy=yes;; +esac + +# Report t...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5644 Summary: Option to recheck basis dirs for existing dest files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: mat...

...;> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: fix packed ring event may missing >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2019/10/22 ??1:10, Marvin Liu wrote: >>>>> When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when >>>>> rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may >>>>> exceed event offset between status check and driver event update. >>>>> >>>>> However, it is possible that flags was not modified if descriptors are >>>>> chained or in_order feature was negotiated....

Is there a command in Asterisk that will cause all Aastra phones to reboot and/or recheck for new firmware? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070312/d394c874/attachment.htm

...a thing. Can enable_signalling fail? What's the reason for fence_signaled() in the first place? >> It doesn't need to be completely reliable, or finish immediately. >> >> And any time wake_up_all(&rdev->fence_queue) is called all the fences that were enabled will be rechecked. > I raised this already somewhere else, but should we have some common > infrastructure in the core fence code to recheck fences periodically? > radeon doesn't seem to be the only hw where this isn't reliable > enough. Of course timer-based rechecking would only work if the d...

...or better handling long file transfers that may be interrupted, however this does nothing to remove the overhead of resuming a dropped rsync transfer, i.e - if you have 100,000 files and the transfer stalls on the last one, then running the command again will cause the 99,000 successful files to be rechecked before the partial one is actually resumed. What I'd like to propose is a set of --resume parameters, when set these will cause rsync (or rather the rsync receiver) to attempt to write a file before closing that describes where in the transfer it go to. If a new rsync transfer begins and su...

...zation at lists.linux-foundation.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: fix packed ring event may missing >> >> >> On 2019/10/22 ??1:10, Marvin Liu wrote: >>> When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when >>> rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may >>> exceed event offset between status check and driver event update. >>> >>> However, it is possible that flags was not modified if descriptors are >>> chained or in_order feature was negotiated. So flags at event offset >&gt...

@ the guy with the ssl certs problem: recheck file- and folder-permissions. check if the ssl.-cert is generated correct. re-check the icecast config-file and it's file- and folder-permissions. are the involved files in the correct location so icecast can find them? what about the pid-entry? greets gee

...MAX_SKB_FRAGS) { > netif_stop_queue(dev); So you changed code to make it think we are out of capacity, now it stops the queue. > > if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) { > /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */ > capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi); > dev_warn(&dev->dev, "free_old_xmit_skbs capacity =%d MAX_SKB_FRAGS=%d", capacity, MAX_SKB_FRAGS); > > capacity = 10; //########## test code : force not...

...MAX_SKB_FRAGS) { > netif_stop_queue(dev); So you changed code to make it think we are out of capacity, now it stops the queue. > > if (unlikely(!virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vi->svq))) { > /* More just got used, free them then recheck. */ > capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi); > dev_warn(&dev->dev, "free_old_xmit_skbs capacity =%d MAX_SKB_FRAGS=%d", capacity, MAX_SKB_FRAGS); > > capacity = 10; //########## test code : force not...

Sorry about that ./configure --with-included-popt But then 200+ plus lines of warnings :( I'll read some more -pete

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:10:04AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote: > When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when > rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may > exceed event offset between status check and driver event update. > > However, it is possible that flags was not modified if descriptors are > chained or in_order feature was negotiated. So flags at event offset This mention of event offset I don...

...sidual vectors (so it executes once for each residue vector). I've measured independently the average time for the whole extra code and it takes approximately 0.00012 secs per call (so that would make roughly 0.00012*channels*frames extra encoding time for an audio file). Despite I've re-re-rechecked my code and I haven't found anything strange, I don't discard at all that may be there are some algorithmic errors left that may make my code be a bit inefficient, but making 2 secs go to 2 mins is quite alarming and far away from permissible. Supposing I have no important algorithmic err...

http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html have lines: Add the directory containing the tools to your PATH. % set path = ( `cd llvm/tools/Debug && pwd` $path ) In my LLVM object directory at LLVM build (obj != src) obj/tools/Debug don't exist (instead exist obj/Debug) Also i recheck obj == src case with same result. I am use and I think command must be updated to set path = ( `cd llvm/Debug/bin && pwd` $path ) Vladimir

Just discovered that on CentOS 4.1 when you issue the command: lvcreate -s -n temp -L2G /dev/vgname/lvname to create a snapshot, you get the error message: snapshot: Required device-mapper target(s) not detected in your kernel I've checked and recheck my spelling and tried using the device created under /dev/mapper. I've tried it on both x86_64 and on i386. Works as expected under CentOS 3.5. Any ideas what is going on?

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 01:10:04AM +0800, Marvin Liu wrote: > When callback is delayed, virtio expect that vhost will kick when > rolling over event offset. Recheck should be taken as used index may > exceed event offset between status check and driver event update. > > However, it is possible that flags was not modified if descriptors are > chained or in_order feature was negotiated. So flags at event offset > may not be valid for descriptor...