search for: rechanged

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703586 Ideas how to move this forward? Debugging techniques? I''m guessing that it''s specific to my hardware, since I''m not seeing anyone else complaining. Anyone else succeed in doing this on an EliteBook?

Hi, I had this hard time installing a server with RAID 1 by software. I always got an error from GRUB and no booting. So, i've installed CentOS 4.4 normally in only one disk. Question is: is it possible now to make a RAID 1 by software with the other disk ? If so, how ? I'm completely lost here. Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, M?rio Gamito -------------- next part

Hi, the only thing i did, was to assign every user to a ohter group. After this i changed the primary group to this new groups and the samba-server itself assigned the users to the group "domain users"automatically (attribute: member). Now i try to revert this and to rechange the primary group to 513. So i can have again a Domain users object with small number of members. Thanx

...i use it to play on several freeshards, and all of them stopped working AT ONCE. The get some error message when i try to log in. when did that happen? when i was changing my network ip adress to another (fixed one) via kde control center. after that i thought of course, thats the problem, so i rechanged it to dhcp, but it seemed, that was not the thing. first i thought i was banned (at once?) and rebooted windows. I used the SAME install there, and it worked. also i changed network config there, and that worked too. so it wasnt my ip adress. maybe my /etc/network/interfaces? or wine? So, of cou...

Hi, I am currently looking at creating an api for a new RESTful app built using rails 2.0. The two solutions I have come across seems to be ActiveResource and ActionWebServices. Although there seems to be plenty of documentation for the older ActionWebServices (both online and in books), this does not seem to be the case for ActiveResource. Does anyone know of any decent articles / screencasts

Hey, one more question for ipp2p iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7 iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK

Hi Philip, I think you might be reading more into the suggestion/discussion than is actually there. * I do not want upstream developers "trying to be polite" if that delays otherwise worthwhile work. Nobody suggested that. It’s perfectly possible to “be polite” and still not delay worthwhile work. * The current policy is "downstream is on their own". Nobody