search for: receding

ARM can reuse all the default scoreboard hazard recognizer logic such as recede cycle (naturally since its the primary client). If you can do the same with PPC that's great. Andy On Nov 29, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> Thanks! Since I have to change PPCHazardRecognizer for bottom-up support >> anyway, is there any reason not to have it

Andy, I should have been more clear, the ARM implementation has: void ARMHazardRecognizer::RecedeCycle() { llvm_unreachable("reverse ARM hazard checking unsupported"); } How does that work? Thanks again, Hal On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 09:47 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > ARM can reuse all the default scoreboard hazard recognizer logic such as recede cycle (naturally since its the

Andy, Is there any good info/docs on scheduling strategy in LLVM? As I was complaining to you at the LLVM meeting, I end up reverse engineering/double guessing more than I would like to... This thread shows that I am not exactly alone in this... Thanks. Sergei Larin -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at

...meant to create an aesthetically pleasing writing experience, which I'll admit is a priority for me. In other words, ideally I want the equivalent of Byword or Macchiato with the option to save as .txt. So, are there any markdown editors for the Mac that do all the "pretty" things (receding the code, stylizing your text, etc) but that DON'T save as .md or .markdown files? Am I correct that Macchiato only saves in markdown format? I'd even take something like MMD Composer, with its colorized & stylized text, if it saved in plain text format. Are there any other Mac/Andro...

On Nov 29, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > Andy, > > I should have been more clear, the ARM implementation has: > void ARMHazardRecognizer::RecedeCycle() { > llvm_unreachable("reverse ARM hazard checking unsupported"); > } > > How does that work? > > Thanks again, > Hal Hal, My first answer was off the top of my head, so missed the subtle

...we are modified and adapted the ldap schema with some ldap entries for this products, the samba schema in the same schema (we have only one lsap schema), and we interactive with this via a ad hoc developed interface. Change or update samba to samba 4 AD implies that we have change the unis schema, receding the interface, proves, etc it is to much time. We try once to implemente samba 4 AD and notice that the ldap schema are very different that we have, so many changes, that implies to many development on the interface. Know I thinking that is posible to make another ldap schema just for samba 4 AD...

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 08:29 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 15:45 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > > > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Is EmitInstruction used in bottom-up scheduling at all? The > > > > version in > > > > the ARM recognizer seems essential, but in all of the

Does anyone have the C reference code of the ITU G.711 Appendix II ? -- Guilherme Loch G?es "Wave after wave will flow with the tide And bury the world as it does Tide after tide will flow and recede Leaving life to go on as it was..." - Neil Peart , Natural Science

...adapted the ldap schema with some ldap entries for this > products, the samba schema in the same schema (we have only one lsap > schema), and we interactive with this via a ad hoc developed interface. > Change or update samba to samba 4 AD implies that we have change the unis > schema, receding the interface, proves, etc it is to much time. Not half as much time as you will spend if your domain totally stops working. Take smbldap-tools for instance, this isn't just EOL, it is dead and disappeared, you cannot find the source code repository anywhere on the internet, it is no longer...

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 15:45 -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > > > > Is EmitInstruction used in bottom-up scheduling at all? The > > > version in > > > the ARM recognizer seems essential, but in all of the regression > > > tests > > > (and some other .ll files I have lying around),

Sergei, I would say that each target has its own scheduling strategy that has changed considerably over time. We try to maximize code reuse across targets, but it's not easy and done ad hoc. The result is confusing code that makes it difficult to understand the strategy for any particular target. The right thing to do is: 1) Make it as easy as possible to understand how scheduling works for

...we are modified and adapted the ldap schema with some ldap entries for this products, the samba schema in the same schema (we have only one lsap schema), and we interactive with this via a ad hoc developed interface. Change or update samba to samba 4 AD implies that we have change the unis schema, receding the interface, proves, etc it is to much time. We try once to implemente samba 4 AD and notice that the ldap schema are very different that we have, so many changes, that implies to many development on the interface. Know I thinking that is posible to make another ldap schema just for samba 4 AD...

Hello we use a samba with a old ldap (zentyal-ebox), for now it is impossible to update to new samba version because we use the ldap schema repository for others purposes, son we can move to another version that support samba 4 AD, for the moment we just keep this version. It is possible to join and validate user with linux desktop, we actually use a lot of clients with windows xp/7 and work

...to inject your own scheduling algorithm. > It's easier to implement a scheduler when starting from a valid > instruction sequence where all dependencies are resolved and no > register interferences exit. [Larin, Sergei] Agree, and my whole point is that it needs to be done with preceding public discussion, and not de-facto with code drops. > > To answer your question, there's no clear way to describe the current > overall scheduling strategy. For now, you'll need to ask porting > questions on llvm-dev. Maybe someone who's faced a similar problem will > h...

...hema with some ldap entries for this > > products, the samba schema in the same schema (we have only one lsap > > schema), and we interactive with this via a ad hoc developed interface. > > Change or update samba to samba 4 AD implies that we have change the unis > > schema, receding the interface, proves, etc it is to much time. > Not half as much time as you will spend if your domain totally stops > working. Take smbldap-tools for instance, this isn't just EOL, it is > dead and disappeared, you cannot find the source code repository > anywhere on the internet,...