search for: recalculation

Hello I am writing a replacement method for an S4 class and want to pass an additional argument to "[<-"() along the lines of "["()'s "drop" argument. Specifically, I have an S4 class, call it "foo", with a slot 'x' that is a vector and a slot 'NC' that is a scalar. I want to be able to pass a Boolean argument to the

Hello, I can't find the information on the wiki :( When is the quota recalculated after a mail deletion ? For instance, I am running low of storage and I use Thunderbird to delete large mail. I only notice a recalculation when I quit Thunderbirdb and I relaunch it. Even, with doveadm CLI, as long as Thunderbird is not disconnected on the client side, the server didn't recalculate the storage available. Thanks for the help ! Thomas -- Thomas Criscione https://thomascriscione.fr GPG: E521 FFF0 13C4 52FB 55EB...

Hello, I intend to use maildir Quota for measurement only, not for applying restrictions. Therefore I defined rather high values. That's working as expected. Nevertheless it's not useful, because the recalculation time is to high. This takes some minutes for my own mailaccount with 250.000 mails on a NFS storage. This would be to bad, but whilst this time, the Mailclient hangs. Probably our users woulnd't accept this. Can this be done in the background? Furthermore I noticed that recalculation occurs af...

...my questions are: 1. Isn't it still better to calculate and show usage even if maildirsize is missing? Because calling quota recalc and then quota get is racy - someone else may change configuration or usage etc. between our two calls (forks). 2. If there's good reason against implicit recalculation, then maybe quota get output should be more specific that neither quota nor usage are known? Instead of usage=0 show -1 or "-" or "n/a" or "unkown"?

Hello, I'm a new user... I have a function : calculate <- function(x,y) { z <- x + y } I would like to use the result (z) with another function : recalculate <- function(...) { a <- z^2 } But R says that z does not exist... How can I use z in an another function ? Thank you for your answer... -- David [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I would a method for Dovecot to recalculate the quota usage and rewrite it to the quota DB (Called on demand by a non-Dovecot POP3 daemon) I don't want the line deleted in the DB as this would only recalculate next time the Dovecot LDA or IMAP handles a message, and I want to keep the data availability contiguous. Can this be done?

...been there since the beginning. Maybe you just happened to be finally triggering this situation. So it's not safe to place the quota updates to a table that has other information also. Also this means that the domain-quota doesn't work 100% in all situations and I guess some kind of a daily recalculation for them would be a good idea..

...<thomas at criscione.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > I can't find the information on the wiki :( > > When is the quota recalculated after a mail deletion ? > > For instance, I am running low of storage and I use Thunderbird to > delete large mail. I only notice a recalculation when I quit > Thunderbirdb and I relaunch it. > > Even, with doveadm CLI, as long as Thunderbird is not disconnected on > the client side, the server didn't recalculate the storage available. > > Thanks for the help ! > > Thomas > > -- > Thomas Criscione &g...

Hi, My current setting for quota is: plugin { #quota = dirsize:User quota #quota = maildir:User quota quota = dict:User quota::proxy::quota #quota = fs:User quota } I have used mb2md.pl and copied result files manually to a desired mail folder - but quota was not recalculated. And it seems, that no matter what I do - the quota usage remains the same. I tried uncommenting line with:

Hi all, we are experencing some, may be strange, slowness in our dovecot/postfix mail system. We have three dovecot 2.0.1 server with LMTP, POP3 and IMAP enabled. Three shared OCFS2 filesystem are used for mail storage. We have too a load balancer based on dovecot director in front of these three server. Our SMTP cluster receives mail and send by LMTP to load balancer. Everything work flowless,

Hi, I'm working on moving a llvm pass from llvm 2.8 to llvm 3.1, and I'm getting this runtime error: opt: symbol lookup error: /......./llvm/Release+Asserts/lib/InstrLLVM_VM_multi.so: undefined symbol: _ZN4llvm17DominatorTreeBaseINS_10BasicBlockEE5resetEv The error happens when calling the next function: void rebuildDT(DominatorTree* DT, Function *parFunc) {

Hello, i use working quotasystem with sql-quotadict. The values stored in db are used to realize also a quotasystem in postfix to reject mails if they are bigger then remaining quota. if dataset in quotadict is missing for some reasons, postfix can't calculate quota and mail gets delivered even if user is already over quota. I am looking for a way to force dovecot/lda to recalculate users

I am thinking about writing a new open source spreadsheet application since I think the spreadsheet applications out there (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, etc.) do not have some features that I would really like to use. I would like the spreadsheet to recalculate very fast and wondered if it would make sense to use LLVM to calculate the cell values quickly. Each cell of a spreadsheet

Good morning, I am trying to add quota storage on mysql following the guide in the wiki http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict, and I am having some problems. My setup works fine for the newly created accounts, and correctly increases/decreases quota when necessary. The wrong part seems to be the recalculation. It seems to me that the system doesn't count the real occupation when it has to recreate the quota entry for a username. This is the case: .- User test at testing.com has a quota 200000 bytes, I delete the entry of the database for user, and then when I do the: echo 'x GETQUOTAROOT Inbox...

...uriosity, in the Quota wiki page, it mentions that 'in theory there > could be e.g. "user quota" and "domain quota" roots'. That's also super > interesting to me. Does anyone have any experience with that? I.e. any > gotchas? There's no automatic quota recalculation for domain quotas, because it would have to somehow sum up all the users' quotas. Also I think that it still does do the automatic quota recalculation if it gets into a situation where it realizes that quotas are wrong, but it'll then just use the single user's quota as the entire domai...

When is the maildir quota usages recalculated and written to the second line of the "maildirsize" file? I'm using 1.1.4, and I reset the quotas for my users by just taking the first line of their maildirsize file and deleting the rest. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de) snickebo at charite.de Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49

...m of finding cut points for a set of stimulus variables. I would like to obtain cut points iteratively for each variable by re-applying a dichotomised variable in the model and then recalculate it. I planned to have fixed names for the dichotomised variables so I could use the same syntax for every recalculation of the whole model. I furthermore want to reiterate the process until no cut point changes any more. My problem is in accomplishing this syntactically. How can I pass a variable name to a function without getting lost in "as.symbol" and "eval" and "parse" mayhem? I am...

On 8/8/19 1:04 PM, Lyude Paul wrote: > I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't > test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake > with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: > > * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 > which is attached to encoder #1.

Hi, I'm looking for a more elegant (and faster) solution to my current problem than the code at the end. I'm sure there is one, but can't think where to look - any pointers would be very welcome. The problem is one of resampling within an array. This array consists of 0s, 1s and NAs. For each level of dimension z, I would like to rewrite the array such that it looks up the values in

I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 which is attached to encoder #1. enabled=y active=n * CRTC #1 is changed from DP-4 to DP-5, causing: *