search for: recalculate

..."()'s "drop" argument. Specifically, I have an S4 class, call it "foo", with a slot 'x' that is a vector and a slot 'NC' that is a scalar. I want to be able to pass a Boolean argument to the replacement method which specifies whether or not to recalculate NC (which is time-consuming and often not needed). I want the default behaviour to be "don't recalculate NC". Toy example follows, in which 'NC' is the sum of x (in my application, calculating NC is an expensive multidimensional integral). setClass("foo",...

Hello, I can't find the information on the wiki :( When is the quota recalculated after a mail deletion ? For instance, I am running low of storage and I use Thunderbird to delete large mail. I only notice a recalculation when I quit Thunderbirdb and I relaunch it. Even, with doveadm CLI, as long as Thunderbird is not disconnected on the client side, the server didn't rec...

Hello, I intend to use maildir Quota for measurement only, not for applying restrictions. Therefore I defined rather high values. That's working as expected. Nevertheless it's not useful, because the recalculation time is to high. This takes some minutes for my own mailaccount with 250.000 mails on a NFS storage. This would be to bad, but whilst this time, the Mailclient hangs. Probably

Hello, I've noticed that "doveadm quota get" doesn't recalculate quota if maildirsize file is missing for some reason. It just says quota is unknown, usage is 0. In contrast, vpopmail does regenerate maildirsize if it is missing. Reading the Maildir++ specification there is this part: ...If maildirsize does not exist, or if its size is at least 5120 byt...

Hello, I'm a new user... I have a function : calculate <- function(x,y) { z <- x + y } I would like to use the result (z) with another function : recalculate <- function(...) { a <- z^2 } But R says that z does not exist... How can I use z in an another function ? Thank you for your answer... -- David [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I would a method for Dovecot to recalculate the quota usage and rewrite it to the quota DB (Called on demand by a non-Dovecot POP3 daemon) I don't want the line deleted in the DB as this would only recalculate next time the Dovecot LDA or IMAP handles a message, and I want to keep the data availability contiguous. Can this be done?

...n > > I can't reproduce this. What's your doveconf -n output? And what's in the dovecot-dict-sql.conf.ext? I still couldn't reproduce this with your exact config. I think that there is no bug or change in behavior in v2.2.19. There are some situations when Dovecot wants to recalculate the quota (e.g. a message is expunged but its size isn't known). In these situations Dovecot recalculates the quota and does a DELETE + INSERT to dict. This code has been there since the beginning. Maybe you just happened to be finally triggering this situation. So it's not safe to place th...

...use there is "Erase Deleted Items" to actually expunge mails previously flagged \Deleted. Sami > On 11 Feb 2020, at 11.18, Thomas Criscione <thomas at criscione.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > I can't find the information on the wiki :( > > When is the quota recalculated after a mail deletion ? > > For instance, I am running low of storage and I use Thunderbird to > delete large mail. I only notice a recalculation when I quit > Thunderbirdb and I relaunch it. > > Even, with doveadm CLI, as long as Thunderbird is not disconnected on > the cli...

Hi, My current setting for quota is: plugin { #quota = dirsize:User quota #quota = maildir:User quota quota = dict:User quota::proxy::quota #quota = fs:User quota } I have used mb2md.pl and copied result files manually to a desired mail folder - but quota was not recalculated. And it seems, that no matter what I do - the quota usage remains the same. I tried uncommenting line with: quota = maildir:User quota but it did not help. Any other idea how to recalculate quota? Greetings, -- Jacek Osiecki joshua at ceti.pl GG:3828944 I don't want something I need. I want...

Hi all, we are experencing some, may be strange, slowness in our dovecot/postfix mail system. We have three dovecot 2.0.1 server with LMTP, POP3 and IMAP enabled. Three shared OCFS2 filesystem are used for mail storage. We have too a load balancer based on dovecot director in front of these three server. Our SMTP cluster receives mail and send by LMTP to load balancer. Everything work flowless,

...error: opt: symbol lookup error: /......./llvm/Release+Asserts/lib/InstrLLVM_VM_multi.so: undefined symbol: _ZN4llvm17DominatorTreeBaseINS_10BasicBlockEE5resetEv The error happens when calling the next function: void rebuildDT(DominatorTree* DT, Function *parFunc) { DT->getBase().recalculate(*parFunc); } All the code executes normally until the first call to this function, when the *recalculate* method calls the protected method *reset*. Any ideas on how to solve this problem ? Thanks, Juan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <htt...

...used to realize also a quotasystem in postfix to reject mails if they are bigger then remaining quota. if dataset in quotadict is missing for some reasons, postfix can't calculate quota and mail gets delivered even if user is already over quota. I am looking for a way to force dovecot/lda to recalculate users bytes/messages with command xy and not to wait for incomming mail. Currently i use: deliver -d $user -n -m folderwithunspeakablenamesonobodyusesthis and send a small message which gets lost but starts the calculation. This works but seems not to be the finest way. Is there a better way or m...

I am thinking about writing a new open source spreadsheet application since I think the spreadsheet applications out there (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, etc.) do not have some features that I would really like to use. I would like the spreadsheet to recalculate very fast and wondered if it would make sense to use LLVM to calculate the cell values quickly. Each cell of a spreadsheet contains an expression, much like an expression in any programming language. The big difference is that the ordering of the expression evaluations is governed by the depen...

Good morning, I am trying to add quota storage on mysql following the guide in the wiki http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict, and I am having some problems. My setup works fine for the newly created accounts, and correctly increases/decreases quota when necessary. The wrong part seems to be the recalculation. It seems to me that the system doesn't count the real occupation when it has to

On 24 Nov 2016, at 9.33, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 23 Nov 2016, at 0.49, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If I move messages between namespaces, it appears to ignore the quotas >> I've >>> set on them.

When is the maildir quota usages recalculated and written to the second line of the "maildirsize" file? I'm using 1.1.4, and I reset the quotas for my users by just taking the first line of their maildirsize file and deleting the rest. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de) snickebo at charite.de Postfi...

Dear expeRts, I am currently struggling with the problem of finding cut points for a set of stimulus variables. I would like to obtain cut points iteratively for each variable by re-applying a dichotomised variable in the model and then recalculate it. I planned to have fixed names for the dichotomised variables so I could use the same syntax for every recalculation of the whole model. I furthermore want to reiterate the process until no cut point changes any more. My problem is in accomplishing this syntactically. How can I pass a variable...

On 8/8/19 1:04 PM, Lyude Paul wrote: > I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't > test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake > with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: > > * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 > which is attached to encoder #1.

...T), dim = c (5,4,2)) temp <- apad (apad (A, c (size,size,0)), c(size,size,0), post = FALSE) # pads array temp[,c (1, (4 + 2 * size)),] <- NA # makes additional rows/cols = NA temp[c (1, (5 + 2 * size)),,] <- NA for (y in 1: 5) { # recalculates within size for (x in 1: 4) { for (z in 1: 2) { A[y,x,z] <- ifelse (sum (temp[(y):(y+2 * size),(x):(x+2 * size),z], na.rm = TRUE) == 0, 0, 1) } } }

I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario: * CRTC #1 has n VCPI allocated to it, is attached to connector DP-4 which is attached to encoder #1. enabled=y active=n * CRTC #1 is changed from DP-4 to DP-5, causing: *