search for: rebutting

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20151216/d2fd2efe/attachment-0001.html>

Gerard, dos preguntas: 1) Porqué quieres directamente especificar los encabezados en el fichero? Es porqué tus ficheros no tienen las columnas igualmente ordenadas? 2) Qué sistema operativo tienes? Un saludo. Olivier ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Reverté Calvet, Gerard" <greverte en ajmataro.cat> Para: "Olivier Nuñez" <onunez en unex.es>, "Javier

I'm not looking to start a discussion of the GPL on R-devel; I'm just giving a reference because the subject of the GPL, the license under which R is issued, has been brought up on this list. If you want to follow some of the legal discussion of the Free Software Foundation's General Public License (GPL), the web site groklaw.net is required reading. One reason is because Pamela

Gerard, supongamos que tu fichero de texto ("test.txt") tiene cuatro columnas separadas por espacios. Si decides llamar estas columnas por ("A","B","C","D"), lo siguiente debería funcionar: linea0="A B C D" fichero <- file("test.txt") linea1<- readLines(fichero) writeLines(c(linea0,linea1), con=fichero)

Hola Gerard, En Windows puedes hacer lo siguiente: Suponiendo que "fichero.txt" es el archivo de texto con tus variables, que se encuentra en el directorio de trabajo [compruébalo con dir()] y que "nombres" es un vector que tienes en R con los nombres que quieres poner a las variables de tu fichero, # guarda los nombres en un fichero llamado "nombres.txt"

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20130418/96cdfbcc/attachment.html>

Carlos e Isidro, nuevamente muchas gracias por vuestra respuesta. Carlos no me he explicado bien. Yo me descargo los datos en XLSX, lo que pasa es que tengo que realizar diversas consultas para poder disponer de todos los datos que quiero, y lo que pretendía con R es preparar un script para utomatizar la descarga y dejar preparados los datos para hacer análisis. Carlos, intenté hacer "web

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20141027/1ad7c503/attachment-0001.html>

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Tom Roeder <tmroeder at google.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Richard Osborne <richard at xmos.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>

On Oct 4, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 October 2011 00:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> 1. The native client folks trying to use LLVM IR as a portable representation that abstracts arbitrary C calling conventions. This doesn't work because the frontend has to know the C calling conventions of the target. > (...) >> 2. The OpenCL folks

On 5 October 2011 01:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > I'm not sure what you're getting at here.  My email was not intended to say that I'm not interested in LLVM improving - quite the contrary.  My email was to rebut Dan's implicit claim that PNaCL and using LLVM as a portable IR is never going to work.  I'm arguing in the "opencl" and

On 5 October 2011 00:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > 1. The native client folks trying to use LLVM IR as a portable representation that abstracts arbitrary C calling conventions.  This doesn't work because the frontend has to know the C calling conventions of the target. (...) > 2. The OpenCL folks trying to turn LLVM into a portable abstraction language by

Hola compañeros de la lista, qué tal. Estoy haciendo un análisis de componentes principales utilizando las funciones "dudi.pca" (paquete "ade4") y "PCA" (paquete "FactoMineR"). Sucede que al comparar las coordenadas de cada individuo que obtiene cada función, las que corresponden al segundo componente principal tienen idéntica magnitud pero con

Instalo ade4 correctamente y no me abren los datos como por ejemplo data(bsetal97) ¿Qué piensan de eso? De: r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org [mailto:r-help-es-bounces en r-project.org] En nombre de Francesc Carmona Enviado el: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 7:30 AM Para: r-help-es en r-project.org Asunto: Re: [R-es] Análisis de componentes principales con ade4 y FactoMineR Por definición

Hi, I've written some code to validate comments passed to libkate, which happens to use the Vorbis comments format (apart from the framing bit, which I dumped rather early). While coding this, I wondered if I should allow empty tags (eg, '=foo'). I had a look at liboggz and vorbiscomment, and they both allow it (I didn't test vorbiscomment, just looked at the source). However,

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Richard Osborne <richard at xmos.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 11 Feb 2014, at 08:15, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: >> >>

Hi, We implemented a Samba4 server which syncs hourly with a database containing (among lots of other data) a list of users with their passwords, etc. So far everything works fine except that users shouldn't be allowed to change their samba4 password from within Windows, but only through the other database (which has its own GUI). I've been unable to find a linux command which allows me

Hola Jesús, Si no entiendo mal lo que planteas, has observado unas frecuencias N = c(12, 0, 8, 6, 4, 2) de pedidos acaecidos en 1:6 días, en total n = sum(N) pedidos. Llamemos P = (p1, p2, ?, p6) a las probabilidades ?teóricas? de pedido en cada día. En principio el vector N se puede considerar una realización de una distribución multinomial M(n; p1, ?, p6). P se puede estimar mediante las

I did manage to dv-tape this from the front row, and thus got pretty fair audio, but a slightly awkward camera angle. NYU Media Lab had a tripod set up at the back, and were apparently intending to webcast the results via real. They were a little taken aback when I mentioned Richard's aversion to propietary formats, and thanked me profusely for pointing it out, and saving them grief.

On Oct 5, 2011, at 1:17 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 5 October 2011 01:19, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure what you're getting at here. My email was not intended to say that I'm not interested in LLVM improving - quite the contrary. My email was to rebut Dan's implicit claim that PNaCL and using LLVM as a portable IR is never going to