Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "reasonnably".
Did you mean:
reasonably
2005 Jul 09
1
Ices host hangup with icecast2.2kh9 on server host
Hi,
I have the following config;
4 ices hosts, ices-kh60
2 are streaming to icecast2.1kh5 server.
2 are streaming to icecast2.2kh9 server.
The 2 hosts streaming to icecast2.2kh9 are crashing (machine crash...)
twice a week.
I was thinking of hardware problem, but it think it's not the case.
To feed ices, I use:
rawrec | ices
Which I found very sensitive and may cause machine handup if
2011 Mar 14
1
[LLVMdev] IndVarSimplify too aggressive ?
Thanks Eli,
After digging thru mail archives & bugzilla, it seems fixing properly this issue would require a major change in the selectionDAG code --- to have it operate on a per function basis instead of per basic-block.
This however, does not seem to be the only issue. The following C code does not produce an efficicient assembly sequence either.
extern void f(unsigned long long v);
void
2005 Oct 06
0
Replicated goodness-of-fit test
...n on patches A and B.
I intended to use the replicated goodness-of-fit test (G-statistic)
described in Sokal & Rohlf (1981): this test seemed accurate for such data...
But a first problem is that some frequencies in my data set are = 0... I
wonder if an x->( x + 1) transformation could be reasonnably performed to
permit the taking of ln(X) in calculations.
Moreover, low frequencies (less than 5) are usually reported as a problem
for G-tests, and because my females had only the choice to oviposit on 6
patches (3 for treatment A, 3 for treatment B), I have indeed low frequencies!
Do you know...
1998 Dec 16
1
Problem with exported Optical Drive
Hi,
I'm using Samba quiet a while and never had a problem I couldn't solve
for myself. Now I've got one :) Everytime I write files > 30 MB on my
exported Fujitsu M2513A Windows is terminating with "Network share is
no longer available". The Windows progress indicator shows nothing, but
the file is written and then discarded (after the error message) !
Now I've set the
2011 Oct 28
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Hi Oskar,
> If having two build systems is a problem, just standardize on cmake.
Does cmake support cross-compilation? Can it cross-compile LLVM ?
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2016 Mar 24
1
NHW codec - progress 2
Hello,
Just a quick message to correct what I have said in my previous post.It
finally seems not that easy to code small wavelet coefficients to have a
good precision, and SPIHT is certainly a very good algorithm for that, -and
I know there are SPIHT experts that can make very good SPIHT-based
codecs-.I have chosen a new and different approach, the multistage residual
coding, so I will try to
2016 Oct 17
2
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 17 October 2016 at 19:44, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> > First stage of gcc is the entire compiler, not a subset or a different
> > compoiler.
>
> I didn't mean a different compiler, just not a full "toolchain".
>
Ah.
You said "GCC has a
2020 May 18
2
Use Galois field New Instructions (GFNI) to combine affine instructions
On 5/18/20 8:24 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
> I can tell you that your avx512 issue is that v64i8 gfni instructions also
> require avx512bw to be enabled to make v64i8 a supported type. The C
> intrinsics handling in the front end know this rule. But since you
> generated your own intrinsics you bypassed that.
Indeed that's the issue... I was stick with what Intel announces here
2005 Oct 15
6
R GUI considerations (was: R, Wine, and multi-threadedness)
...mportant to insist on this, in a world
populated with a myriad of slowly developed, half finished, half
featured R GUIs, made by people that look too individualist in my view
to be able of working all together and to write a single R GUI that has
any chance to be full-featured, well-documented, reasonnably bug-free,
truly platform-independent, in a near future.
Best,
Philippe Grosjean
..............................................<?}))><........
) ) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( Prof. Philippe Grosjean
) ) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( Numerical Ecology of Aquatic Systems
) ) ) ) ) Mons-Hainaut Univer...
2011 Mar 13
0
[LLVMdev] IndVarSimplify too aggressive ?
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison
<Arnaud.AllardDeGrandMaison at dibcom.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The IndVarSimplify pass seems to be too aggressive when it enlarge the induction variable type ; this can pessimize the generated code when the new induction variable size is not natively supported by the target. This is probably not an issue for x86_64,
2007 Aug 06
1
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling LLVM under Cygwin/Mingw
Hello, Alain.
> I'm starting to play with LLVM today and I've trouble compiling it.
> I'm
> working under Windows Vista, with the gcc from Cygwin:
Oh, this seems to be killer mix :) GCC (at least native mingw32 port)
has known problems being running on Vista.
> Is LLVM supposed to work with this version of GCC (probably using the
> -mno-cygwin option to get a
2016 Oct 18
3
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4
...2 ways:
- ultra costly languages/runtime to implement (c++/java...), and I don't think
"ultra" is a word big enough.
- multiplication of script languages (python2/python3/ruby/javascript/perl/guile...)
It is to keep the technical cost the lowest possible in order to let the door
reasonnably open to alternatives of the same language. c++ is slapping this
door at the face of any attempt to produce working alternatives.
An other point of view is the level of entry which is usually much higher on
c++ projects due to syntax complexity, and often non-pertinent in
the goal to achieve.
Then...
2011 Mar 13
7
[LLVMdev] IndVarSimplify too aggressive ?
Hi all,
The IndVarSimplify pass seems to be too aggressive when it enlarge the induction variable type ; this can pessimize the generated code when the new induction variable size is not natively supported by the target. This is probably not an issue for x86_64, which supports natively all types, but it is a real one for several embedded targets, with very few native types.
I attached a patch to
2010 Feb 02
7
Help needed with zfs send/receive
Hi folks,
I''m having (as the title suggests) a problem with zfs send/receive.
Command line is like this :
pfexec zfs send -Rp tank/tsm@snapshot | ssh remotehost pfexec zfs recv
-v -F -d tank
This works like a charm as long as the snapshot is small enough.
When it gets too big (meaning somewhere between 17G and 900G), I get
ssh errors (can''t read from remote host).
I tried
2004 Feb 10
22
Re: [Shorewall-newbies] specific log-prefix ... patch
Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list....
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote:
> here is a patch to allow this :
> |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp
>
> a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory.
> i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw.
Also, with