Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "reasonbly".
Did you mean:
reasonably
2007 Jan 03
1
problem with logLik and offsets
Hi,
I'm trying to compare models, one of which has all parameters fixed
using offsets. The log-likelihoods seem reasonble in all cases except
the model in which there are no free parameters (model3 in the toy
example below). Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Jarrod
x<-rnorm(100)
y<-rnorm(100, 1+x)
model1<-lm(y~x)
logLik(model1)
sum(dnorm(y, predict(model1),
2008 Oct 25
5
sse, mmx support for hvm guests
Hi,
I''ve a quad-core x86_64 machine (Intel Xeon), with sse/mmx support.
However, I want to disable sse/mmx support from HVM guests. How can I
do this? Also, is it reasonable to expect illegal instruction fault in
non-root VMX mode if a guest VM runs an application with sse/mmx
instructions?
Thanks,
Ashish
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
2002 Jul 04
0
Fw: secureid and CA
> | The ACE server has _nothing_ to do with a CA
I know . But still there should be some kind of feature to offer
"centralized authentication" with no relying on the 2 ssh sides, anyone
agree ?
(I suggested the ACE for 3 reasons:
the team here find it reasonbly o.k - at list by looking in the archives
it's quite known
it's a good starting point - i think)
TIA ,
Ran Sasson
I.O. Ltd.
2010 Dec 10
0
Fwd: Re: samba4 AD controller, production
...courage!)
Been using it for 8 months now. 3 Samba4 servers and a W2K3R2 and
Samba4 as PDC, no real problems. Bit more lag than I'd like with
account updates across controllers. DNS can give a few headaches, esp.
if you're not comfortable with BIND. I'm quite comfortable with it for
a reasonbly small deployment.
>
>>
>>
>>
> Running samba4 in production for nearly 3 years now, no big big
> problem
> (well a couple of quite annoying bugs in the first 6 months, but since
> then it's quite smooth).
>
> Do a daily backup of your samba provision...
2011 Mar 22
2
lm ~ v1 + log(v1) + ... improve adj Rsq ¿any sense?
Dear all,
I want to improve my adj - R sq. I 've chequed some established models and
they introduce two times the same variable, one transformed, and the other
not. It also improves my adj - R sq.
But, isn't this bad for the collinearity? Do I interpret coefficients as
usual?
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 1.73140 7.22477 0.240
2005 Jul 15
13
CentOS on Compaq Proliant Rackmount Servers
Greetings,
Can anyone relate experience(s) installing CentOS on Compaq rack mount
servers units please?
Easy no problem, easy some issues, or ghastly do not do it under any
circumstances... ;)
Basically, I'm looking at some used/refurb dual PIII units and will run RAID
on Compaq built in SCSI or is it easy to pop in some 3ware SATA in them?
Let me know in terms of CentOS 3 and/or 4 please.