Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "reasonbaly".
Did you mean:
reasonably
2017 Jan 26
2
Critical XRay fixes for Arm32
How is XRay tested? IIRC, Renato didn't see any test failures on ARM?
Merging sounds reasonbaly, I'd just like to understand what's the risk
for the branch.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hans, these changes reached trunk in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292516 and
> https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292517 . Could you look?
&g...
2017 Jan 26
2
Critical XRay fixes for Arm32
...ed when making&testing the
> fixes, somehow didn't get to 4.0 branch.
>
>
> On 26 January 2017 at 21:44, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> How is XRay tested? IIRC, Renato didn't see any test failures on ARM?
>>
>> Merging sounds reasonbaly, I'd just like to understand what's the risk
>> for the branch.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hans, these changes reached trunk in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL292516
>> > and
&...
2017 Jan 26
2
Critical XRay fixes for Arm32
...et to 4.0 branch.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 26 January 2017 at 21:44, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> How is XRay tested? IIRC, Renato didn't see any test failures on ARM?
>> >>
>> >> Merging sounds reasonbaly, I'd just like to understand what's the risk
>> >> for the branch.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Serge Rogatch
>> >> <serge.rogatch at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hans, these changes reached...
2017 Jan 26
2
Critical XRay fixes for Arm32
Sorry, I initially included LLVM-Commits rather than LLVM-Dev. Fixed.
On 26 January 2017 at 03:26, Serge Rogatch <serge.rogatch at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dean, Renato,
>
> AFAIK, unfortunately, these critical Arm32 XRay fixes are not yet in 4.0:
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D28624 , https://reviews.llvm.org/D28623 . The
> first repairs XRay instrumentation map emission.