search for: rearchitecture

As far as I can tell when the ssh command uses an agent to authenticate to a server and then forwards an agent to that server, it will always use the same agent for both purposes. Has there been any attempt to make it possible for the ssh command to use two different agents, such that I can use one agent to authenticate and then forward a different agent to the server? -- Kasper Dupont --

...The SourceForge project page is at: http://sourceforge.net/project/winex The CVSROOT for CVS is: :pserver:anonymous@cvs.winex.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/winex We're doing WineHQ merge-ins every week or two, so things should stay relatively up to date. Currently, we're undertaking a rearchitecture of the Direct3D work, along the lines of the DDraw HAL work we've been contributing to the WineHQ tree. Basically, we're seperating the glX code into the x11drv for device independance. We're also redoing the front end interfaces to start supporting D3D APIs both older and newer than...

...emory areas into a single command stream memory written by earlier commands. IB mode is described along with DMA mode in :ref:`fifo-dma-pusher`. -NVC0 rearchitected the whole PFIFO, made it possible to have up to 3 channels -executing simultanously, and introduced a new DMA packet format. +NVC0 rearchitectured the whole PFIFO, made it possible to have up to 3 channels +executing simultaneously, and introduced a new DMA packet format. The commands, as stored in CACHE, are tuples of: @@ -180,12 +180,12 @@ and engine-specific documentation. Pre-NV1A, PFIFO treats everything as little-endian. NV1A i...

...uld be able to get most NATed phones to work.. As for Asterisk as a > Client I havent really had a lot of experience with that so I am not > really sure what is needed.. > > > I think a lot of things can be added to channel_sip.c without doing > the > > channel_sip.c-ng++ rearchitecture. This said standing on thin ice > since > > I haven't got full insight into how channel_sip works, source-code > wise. > > I can't really help there either.. I know squat about C coding.. and the > > times I have looked at the source it really didn't really ma...

Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > How large of a change have you made? With 3 days before the branch > creation, I strongly advise people not to be checking in major changes. Depends how you look at it. Structurally, it separates two files into four and moves some functionality from one class to a new class, so in a sense that's a big change. Code-logic-wise, it does nothing at all. I will

--- rnndb/memory/nvc0_pbfb.xml | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/rnndb/memory/nvc0_pbfb.xml b/rnndb/memory/nvc0_pbfb.xml index 500cea9..e006dbe 100644 --- a/rnndb/memory/nvc0_pbfb.xml +++ b/rnndb/memory/nvc0_pbfb.xml @@ -49,23 +49,54 @@ Most bitfields are unknown. </doc> <bitfield high="7"

> I very much want to get my regalloc refactoring changes in but I don't > have a consistent platform to test them on. Someone broke llvm-gcc > bootstrapping late last week or this week. How large of a change have you made? With 3 days before the branch creation, I strongly advise people not to be checking in major changes. > Can we please freeze features for a while and get

Hi Folks, I find myself trying to expand a 2-node high-availability cluster from to a 4-node cluster. I'm running Xen virtualization, and currently using DRBD to mirror data, and pacemaker to failover cleanly. The thing is, I'm trying to add 2 nodes to the cluster, and DRBD doesn't scale. Also, as a function of rackspace limits, and the hardware at hand, I can't separate