search for: rearchitecting

...ler improvements (not necessarily in instcombine but around that level) do seem to matter at least in individual contexts. It's not clear how much those actually mattered in a grander scheme of things, though. It sounds like we don't want to add to instcombine due to added cost/complexity, rearchitecting would be hard, it's not clear if incremental changes in instcombine did much per cost, which would make it harder to justify rearchitecting it... What do people think of approaches like D41574 and D45842? > -Hal > > > --Dan > > > > > > > > ______________...

Hi Ian, Natasha and I are interested in helping with the io emulation work for fully virtualized HVM guests you mentioned in your March 12th email: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-03/msg00394.html In the post, you mentioned the following tasks: - get minios running on x86_64 - port xenbus/netfront/blkfront to minios - compile qemu-dm into minios - redirect IO to qemu-dm

I have done some work with the javascript and stylesheet helpers for ToolbawksPacker.. http://svn.toolbawks.com/toolbawks_packer/trunk/ Which more/less takes all executed javascript_include_tags and stylesheet_link_tag on any converged view (combines all partials and such) and builds a list of js and css files respectively and uses that to form a cache. In additon, it also minifies the JS using

...cessarily in instcombine but around that level) do > seem to matter at least in individual contexts. It's not clear how much > those actually mattered in a grander scheme of things, though. > > It sounds like we don't want to add to instcombine due to added > cost/complexity, rearchitecting would be hard, it's not clear if > incremental changes in instcombine did much per cost, which would make it > harder to justify rearchitecting it... > > What do people think of approaches like D41574 and D45842? > > > >> -Hal >> >> >> --Dan >&gt...

...be LLDB’s DWARF parsing code, which is more > featureful than LLVM’s but has kind of evolved in parallel. Sinking this > into LLVM would be one early target of such an effort, although over time > there would likely be more. > > As you are undoubtedly aware we've been carefully rearchitecting LLVM's > DWARF parser over the last few years to eventually become featureful enough > so that LLDB could use it, so any help on that front would be most welcome. > As long as we are careful to not regress in performance/lazyness, features > and fault-tolerance, deduplicating the im...

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24

On 05/11/2018 08:40 PM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com > <mailto:yamauchi at google.com>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel Berlin > <dberlin at dberlin.org <mailto:dberlin at dberlin.org>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Hiroshi

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:24 PM Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:15 AM

In the normal override method, you can change the value of a parameter, but can you unset a parameter? file { "/etc/somefile": mode => 644, owner => "dude" } File ["/etc/somefile"] { mode => unset } ??

Hi, We are try to use the "database_manager =>CGI::Session::MemoryStore" for the session management. our website has a lot of "redirect_to". while the website is running under webrick, everything is fine. But when we run the system under aprache/fcgi. the redirect_to seems doesn''t work anymore with the option "MemoryStore" does anyone have the same

...which to the ntfs-3g driver looks like disk corruption. This is just what happens when you make inconsistent snapshots of disk unfortunately. My best suggestion would be: - Catch the exception in Python - When you hit this error, skip this snapshot and go on to the next one That may involve rearchitecting your application a bit, but if the error is rare, it seems like the best way to handle it. An alternative, if you're not doing it already, would be to take a consistent snapshot. Assuming the guest is well-behaved and the filesystem uses journalling and the journalling is implemented correctl...

On May 16, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 16.05.2008, 06:54 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: >> On May 13, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: >> >>> On May 13, 2008, at 18:28, Dan Gohman wrote: >>> >>> I wonder if it would be worthwhile to have a flag on loads to mark >>> them as immutable. A flag from the

Just wondering if anyone is using a backend database other than sqlite, and if so, how easy/hard it was to configure. I''m constantly receiving "SQLite3::BusyException: database is locked..." which I presume is due to sqlite''s relatively coarse locking method. Cheers, James -- Senior Linux Platform Engineer Midrange Services AXA Technology Services - Asia Pacific

sorry, was only for users list... Hi Kevin, Hi list, you are right, acting now is not needed, when callbacklogin will be removed anywhere in future... But thinking how to realice alternatives can't be so wrong. Callbacklogin gives a very simple way to use more queues for one agent, which only has to logon to only one system. No need to make dbs or tables for saving, where the agent has to be

Hi, I installed Syslinux 6.03 on Windows 2008 R2 for PXE Boot. Legacy Boot works fine. In UEFI PXE boot ( files taken from /efi64, syslinux.efi renamed to bootmgfw.efi ) the System boots up into menu correctly. In "default" I configured to either boot efishell.64 or bootx64.efi (Windows PE). But I get following error if I select on to boot: Invalid boot signature 0x00,

--- docs/hw/fifo/intro.rst | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/hw/fifo/intro.rst b/docs/hw/fifo/intro.rst index 8b1d69d..0e023bf 100644 --- a/docs/hw/fifo/intro.rst +++ b/docs/hw/fifo/intro.rst @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ FIFO overview Introduction ============ -Commands to most of the engines are sent through a special engine

Hi all, We have been thinking internally about a lightweight llvm-based ptracer. To address one question up front: the primary way in which this differs from LLDB is that it targets a more narrow use case -- there is no scripting support, no clang integration, no dynamic extensibility, no support for running jitted code in the target, and no user interface. We have several use cases internally

Am Freitag, den 16.05.2008, 06:54 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On May 13, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > > > On May 13, 2008, at 18:28, Dan Gohman wrote: > > > > I wonder if it would be worthwhile to have a flag on loads to mark > > them as immutable. A flag from the source language stating "this load > > never aliases any subsequent

...ption. > > This is just what happens when you make inconsistent snapshots of disk > unfortunately. > > My best suggestion would be: > > - Catch the exception in Python > > - When you hit this error, skip this snapshot and go on to the next one > > That may involve rearchitecting your application a bit, but if the > error is rare, it seems like the best way to handle it. > > An alternative, if you're not doing it already, would be to take a > consistent snapshot. Assuming the guest is well-behaved and the > filesystem uses journalling and the journalling...