search for: rearchitect

...ng we don't want to put those in instcombine)? >>>> >>>> And it sounds like the answer is yes? >>>> >>> >>> If you take the current instcombine as a base, then yes, that is correct. >>> >> ​​ >>> If you are willing to rearchitect instcombine, the answer is no, it's >>> possible to do this all in a single pass in a relatively sane way. >>> >> >> I assume by rearchitect, you mean a major rewrite as per this comment: "Is >> there a way to determine all expressions in the program as...

Hi Ian, Natasha and I are interested in helping with the io emulation work for fully virtualized HVM guests you mentioned in your March 12th email: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2006-03/msg00394.html In the post, you mentioned the following tasks: - get minios running on x86_64 - port xenbus/netfront/blkfront to minios - compile qemu-dm into minios - redirect IO to qemu-dm

I have done some work with the javascript and stylesheet helpers for ToolbawksPacker.. http://svn.toolbawks.com/toolbawks_packer/trunk/ Which more/less takes all executed javascript_include_tags and stylesheet_link_tag on any converged view (combines all partials and such) and builds a list of js and css files respectively and uses that to form a cache. In additon, it also minifies the JS using

...? >>>>> >>>>> And it sounds like the answer is yes? >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you take the current instcombine as a base, then yes, that is >>>> correct. >>>> >>> ​​ >>>> If you are willing to rearchitect instcombine, the answer is no, it's >>>> possible to do this all in a single pass in a relatively sane way. >>>> >>> >>> I assume by rearchitect, you mean a major rewrite as per this comment: "Is >>> there a way to determine all expression...

...be LLDB’s DWARF parsing code, which is more > featureful than LLVM’s but has kind of evolved in parallel. Sinking this > into LLVM would be one early target of such an effort, although over time > there would likely be more. > > As you are undoubtedly aware we've been carefully rearchitecting LLVM's > DWARF parser over the last few years to eventually become featureful enough > so that LLDB could use it, so any help on that front would be most welcome. > As long as we are careful to not regress in performance/lazyness, features > and fault-tolerance, deduplicating the...

...n one >>> shot, (assuming we don't want to put those in instcombine)? >>> >>> And it sounds like the answer is yes? >>> >> >> If you take the current instcombine as a base, then yes, that is correct. >> > ​​ >> If you are willing to rearchitect instcombine, the answer is no, it's >> possible to do this all in a single pass in a relatively sane way. >> > > I assume by rearchitect, you mean a major rewrite as per this comment: "Is > there a way to determine all expressions in the program as it exists that >...

...assuming we don't > want to put those in instcombine)? > > And it sounds like the answer is yes? > > > If you take the current instcombine as a base, then yes, that > is correct. > > ​​ > If you are willing to rearchitect instcombine, the answer is > no, it's possible to do this all in a single pass in a > relatively sane way. > > > I assume by rearchitect, you mean a major rewrite as per this > comment: "Is there a way to determine all expressions in the > p...

...able to somehow handle those cases in one >> shot, (assuming we don't want to put those in instcombine)? >> >> And it sounds like the answer is yes? >> > > If you take the current instcombine as a base, then yes, that is correct. > ​​ > If you are willing to rearchitect instcombine, the answer is no, it's > possible to do this all in a single pass in a relatively sane way. > I assume by rearchitect, you mean a major rewrite as per this comment: "Is there a way to determine all expressions in the program as it exists that are equivalent or equivalen...

...rather > than just one that may be able to somehow handle those cases in one shot, > (assuming we don't want to put those in instcombine)? > > And it sounds like the answer is yes? > If you take the current instcombine as a base, then yes, that is correct. If you are willing to rearchitect instcombine, the answer is no, it's possible to do this all in a single pass in a relatively sane way. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180510/2429409e/attachment.html>

In the normal override method, you can change the value of a parameter, but can you unset a parameter? file { "/etc/somefile": mode => 644, owner => "dude" } File ["/etc/somefile"] { mode => unset } ??

Hi, We are try to use the "database_manager =>CGI::Session::MemoryStore" for the session management. our website has a lot of "redirect_to". while the website is running under webrick, everything is fine. But when we run the system under aprache/fcgi. the redirect_to seems doesn''t work anymore with the option "MemoryStore" does anyone have the same

...which to the ntfs-3g driver looks like disk corruption. This is just what happens when you make inconsistent snapshots of disk unfortunately. My best suggestion would be: - Catch the exception in Python - When you hit this error, skip this snapshot and go on to the next one That may involve rearchitecting your application a bit, but if the error is rare, it seems like the best way to handle it. An alternative, if you're not doing it already, would be to take a consistent snapshot. Assuming the guest is well-behaved and the filesystem uses journalling and the journalling is implemented corre...

On May 16, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 16.05.2008, 06:54 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: >> On May 13, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: >> >>> On May 13, 2008, at 18:28, Dan Gohman wrote: >>> >>> I wonder if it would be worthwhile to have a flag on loads to mark >>> them as immutable. A flag from the

Just wondering if anyone is using a backend database other than sqlite, and if so, how easy/hard it was to configure. I''m constantly receiving "SQLite3::BusyException: database is locked..." which I presume is due to sqlite''s relatively coarse locking method. Cheers, James -- Senior Linux Platform Engineer Midrange Services AXA Technology Services - Asia Pacific

...de to Asterisk 1.6 and have to replace it. If there is no simple replacement available to you at that time (which would be highly surprising considering that it already exists today) then I can see your point, but acting today like the functionality has been removed and that you are being forced to rearchitect your system seems a little bit extreme (in my opinion, of course). _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users...

Hi, I installed Syslinux 6.03 on Windows 2008 R2 for PXE Boot. Legacy Boot works fine. In UEFI PXE boot ( files taken from /efi64, syslinux.efi renamed to bootmgfw.efi ) the System boots up into menu correctly. In "default" I configured to either boot efishell.64 or bootx64.efi (Windows PE). But I get following error if I select on to boot: Invalid boot signature 0x00,

...a-pusher`. NV50 introduced IB mode. IB mode is a modified version of DMA mode that, @@ -143,8 +143,8 @@ to stitch together parts of multiple memory areas into a single command stream memory written by earlier commands. IB mode is described along with DMA mode in :ref:`fifo-dma-pusher`. -NVC0 rearchitected the whole PFIFO, made it possible to have up to 3 channels -executing simultanously, and introduced a new DMA packet format. +NVC0 rearchitectured the whole PFIFO, made it possible to have up to 3 channels +executing simultaneously, and introduced a new DMA packet format. The commands, as stor...

Hi all, We have been thinking internally about a lightweight llvm-based ptracer. To address one question up front: the primary way in which this differs from LLDB is that it targets a more narrow use case -- there is no scripting support, no clang integration, no dynamic extensibility, no support for running jitted code in the target, and no user interface. We have several use cases internally

Am Freitag, den 16.05.2008, 06:54 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On May 13, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > > > On May 13, 2008, at 18:28, Dan Gohman wrote: > > > > I wonder if it would be worthwhile to have a flag on loads to mark > > them as immutable. A flag from the source language stating "this load > > never aliases any subsequent

...ption. > > This is just what happens when you make inconsistent snapshots of disk > unfortunately. > > My best suggestion would be: > > - Catch the exception in Python > > - When you hit this error, skip this snapshot and go on to the next one > > That may involve rearchitecting your application a bit, but if the > error is rare, it seems like the best way to handle it. > > An alternative, if you're not doing it already, would be to take a > consistent snapshot. Assuming the guest is well-behaved and the > filesystem uses journalling and the journall...