Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "reaquaint".
2014 Jun 19
0
Lets work towards a new version
...better to rename FLAC.sln to FLAC-vs2005.sln?)
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I think having 64 bit builds on Windows would be a good thing. Unfortunately
> since I don't have *any* Windows machines to even test on, zero recent
> experience on Windows and little desire to reaquaint myself with Windows
> this is not a job for me. However, I am more than happy to have someone
> else undertake this task, and will help where I can.
>
> As for what versions of MSVC we should support, I am not really
> qualified to say. What do other similar projects do? Eg Audacity?...
2014 Jun 19
5
Lets work towards a new version
...FLAC-vs201x.sln? or is it better to rename FLAC.sln to FLAC-vs2005.sln?)
>
> What do you think?
I think having 64 bit builds on Windows would be a good thing. Unfortunately
since I don't have *any* Windows machines to even test on, zero recent
experience on Windows and little desire to reaquaint myself with Windows
this is not a job for me. However, I am more than happy to have someone
else undertake this task, and will help where I can.
As for what versions of MSVC we should support, I am not really
qualified to say. What do other similar projects do? Eg Audacity?
My main concern about...
2014 Jun 19
10
Lets work towards a new version
Hi all,
It sees that the most serious bug in the flac bug tracker:
https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/413/
has been fixed in git. This fix alone is worth a new release so its
time to work towards one.
Things I need to do for this new release:
* Deal with all current patches on the mailing list.
* Review all bugs reported against 1.3.0 on the sf.net.
* Testing and coordination of testing