Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "reappropri".
Did you mean:
appropri
2009 Apr 16
1
[1/2] tun: Only free a netdev when all tun descriptors are closed
...hat until
> all tun descriptors ever attached to the device (even if they
> have since be detached because they may still be sitting in poll)
> have been closed.
>
> This is done by using reference counting the attached tun file
> descriptors. The refcount in tun->sk has been reappropriated
> for this purpose since it was already being used for that, albeit
> from the opposite angle.
>
> Note that we no longer zero tfile->tun since tun_get will return
> NULL anyway after the refcount on tfile hits zero. Instead it
> represents whether this device has ever be...
2009 Apr 16
1
[1/2] tun: Only free a netdev when all tun descriptors are closed
...hat until
> all tun descriptors ever attached to the device (even if they
> have since be detached because they may still be sitting in poll)
> have been closed.
>
> This is done by using reference counting the attached tun file
> descriptors. The refcount in tun->sk has been reappropriated
> for this purpose since it was already being used for that, albeit
> from the opposite angle.
>
> Note that we no longer zero tfile->tun since tun_get will return
> NULL anyway after the refcount on tfile hits zero. Instead it
> represents whether this device has ever be...
2009 Jul 27
3
I/O load distribution
Hi,
What is the best way to deal with I/O load when running several VMs on a
physical machine with local or remote storage?
What I'm primarily worried about is the case when several VMs cause disk
I/O at the same time. One example would be the "updatedb" cronjob of the
mlocate package. If you have say 5 VMs running on a physical System with a
local software raid-1 as storage and
2005 Dec 22
8
Payflow Pro (was Re: FatWreck.com - New Rails Site)
Several years ago, before PHP introduced their built-in pfpro functions, I
rolled my own crappy interface, which of course delegated to the commandline
payflow client. I could certainly do the same in Ruby today.
Thinking back on it, I realized at the time, and realize again now, that
delegating this functionality to a commandline app is a security risk unless
you''re the *only* user on