search for: reanalyz

...s determination. Enhancing the logic there to consider the result types in this case seems like it should be straightforward, but how general a problem is this? [Can this problem only happen with vsetcc nodes?] Maybe, for example, after the ScanOperands part of DAGTypeLegalizer::run, if we need to reanalyze, we should actually run ScanOperands again instead of starting with the result-type processing? Thanks in advance, Hal -- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

...nation. Enhancing the logic there to consider the result types in this case seems like it should be straightforward, but how general a problem is this? [Can this problem only happen with vsetcc nodes?] > > Maybe, for example, after the ScanOperands part of DAGTypeLegalizer::run, if we need to reanalyze, we should actually run ScanOperands again instead of starting with the result-type processing? > > Thanks in advance, > Hal >

Dear all, I'm interested in testing 2 nonlinear restrictions on coefficients of a nls object. Is there a package for doing this? Something in the lines of `test(nls object, res=c("res 1","res 2"),...)' I only found the function delta.method in the alr3 library that calculates the se of a singleton nonlinear restriction of a nls object using the delta method. Thanks in

Hi, Thanks for this information. Is there any way to force R to use Type-1 SS? I think most textbooks use this only. Thanks and regards, On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 at 17:00, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2024-08-07 6:06 a.m., Brian Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have performed ANOVA as below > > > > dat = data.frame( > >

Hi Tobi, Thank you very much for the elaborate advises and sorry for the long delay. I have kept thinking your advises and investigate more detail of the existing code of Polly. Now, I re-evaluate my proposal and something interesting is added to the new one. ：） On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > Hi Qingrui Liu, > > sorry for replying