Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "realups".
Did you mean:
realms
2016 Nov 18
0
Can this be done with NUT? (ordered shutdown, revisited)
...ky to forward too
when the driver is used in this mode. These are OK at present as
forwarding is marked as FIXME but there is an implication this will not
always be the case.
I am arranging a phased shutdown and currently have a topology with
Server conntected to real UPS:
MODE=netserver
MONITOR=realups at localhost 1 upsmon secret master
MINSUPPLIES=1
Server connected to repeated UPS:
MODE=netserver
MONITOR repeated at localhost 0 upsmon secret master
MONITOR realups at server 1 upsmon secret slave
MINSUPPLIES=1
Clients connect to either the primary or secondary server as netclients
as per thei...
2023 Aug 06
1
Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns
...es
might need something different in e.g. `upsmon`.
One idea that comes to mind though would be to use dummy-ups (or clone*)
drivers as relays, specifically to inject custom overrides (if/when that
mechanism works to generate LB) over "real device" data. So your server
could have a "realups" section as well as some dummies proxying its other
info and overridden to have LBs at say 90%, 50% and 30% marks. And
different clients would monitor different such constructs.
Jim
On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 7:59?PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
&g...
2023 Aug 06
1
Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns
...es
might need something different in e.g. `upsmon`.
One idea that comes to mind though would be to use dummy-ups (or clone*)
drivers as relays, specifically to inject custom overrides (if/when that
mechanism works to generate LB) over "real device" data. So your server
could have a "realups" section as well as some dummies proxying its other
info and overridden to have LBs at say 90%, 50% and 30% marks. And
different clients would monitor different such constructs.
Jim
On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 7:59?PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
&g...
2023 Aug 06
1
Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns
Hi Jim,
I was thinking about setting different values for each device , so the first system has higher values and shutdowns?earlier:override.battery.charge.lowoverride.battery.runtime.low
Won?t it work ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov?
On Sunday, August 6, 2023, 7:41 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
Yeah, I have no lack of imagination about
2023 Aug 06
1
Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns
Hi Jim,
I was thinking about setting different values for each device , so the first system has higher values and shutdowns?earlier:override.battery.charge.lowoverride.battery.runtime.low
Won?t it work ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov?
On Sunday, August 6, 2023, 7:41 PM, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
Yeah, I have no lack of imagination about
2023 Aug 06
1
Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns
Yeah, I have no lack of imagination about scenarios where that can be
useful - just was surprised to see no apparent "here's how you do it" sort
of man page or something,
Although technically the shutdown scenario like yours, where a NAS server
only is told to go down - or actually does so (which is substantially
different and can be implemented elsewhere) - after its consumers go
2023 Aug 06
1
Setting up charge/voltage based shutdowns
Yeah, I have no lack of imagination about scenarios where that can be
useful - just was surprised to see no apparent "here's how you do it" sort
of man page or something,
Although technically the shutdown scenario like yours, where a NAS server
only is told to go down - or actually does so (which is substantially
different and can be implemented elsewhere) - after its consumers go